苏珊娜•卡森:耶鲁大学法语系博士,曾执教于牛津大学、格拉斯哥大学、哈佛大学等,讲授英国与法国文学。
(简•奥斯丁,在英国小说的发展史上有承上启下的意义,被誉为地位“可与莎士比亚平起平坐”的作家。)
For so many of us a Jane Austen novel is much more than the epitome of a great read. It is a delight and a solace, a challenge and a reward, and perhaps even an obsession. For two centuries Austen has enthralled readers. Few other authors can claim as many fans or as much devotion. So why are we so fascinated with her novels? What is it about her prose that has made Jane Austen so universally beloved?
In essays culled from the last one hundred years of criticism juxtaposed with new pieces by some of today’s most popular novelists and essayists, Jane Austen’s writing is examined and discussed, from her witty dialogue to the arc and sweep of her story lines. Great authors and literary critics of the past offer insights into the timelessness of her moral truths while highlighting the unique confines of the society in which she composed her novels. Virginia Woolf examines Austen’s maturation as an artist and speculates on how her writing would have changed if she’d lived twenty more years, while C. S. Lewis celebrates Austen’s mirthful, ironic take on traditional values.
Modern voices celebrate Austen’s amazing legacy with an equal amount of eloquence and enthusiasm. Fay Weldon reads Mansfield Park as an interpretation of Austen’s own struggle to be as “good” as Fanny Price. Anna Quindlen examines the enduring issues of social pressure and gender politics that make Pride and Prejudice as vital today as ever. Alain de Botton praises Mansfield Park for the way it turns Austen’s societal hierarchy on its head. Amy Bloom finds parallels between the world of Persuasion and Austen’s own life. And Amy Heckerling reveals how she transformed the characters of Emma into denizens of 1990s Beverly Hills for her comedy Clueless. From Harold Bloom to Martin Amis, Somerset Maugham to Jay McInerney, Eudora Welty to Margot Livesey, each writer here reflects on Austen’s place in both the literary canon and our cultural imagination.
We read, and then reread, our favorite Austen novels to connect with both her world and our own. Because, as A Truth Universally Acknowledged so eloquently demonstrates, the only thing better than reading a Jane Austen novel is finding in our own lives her humor, emotion, and love.
因为找不到英文原版的,所以买了这本。 话说,每次看到这种精装版的烂书就会压不住怒火。这得浪费多少纸张资源啊!!! 整本书只提供了两个颇有价值的观点,作为一本关于奥斯丁的书来说,时间的投入产出比低到不能再低了。也许这本书最大的贡献就是让人了解现如今英文essay的良...
评分因为找不到英文原版的,所以买了这本。 话说,每次看到这种精装版的烂书就会压不住怒火。这得浪费多少纸张资源啊!!! 整本书只提供了两个颇有价值的观点,作为一本关于奥斯丁的书来说,时间的投入产出比低到不能再低了。也许这本书最大的贡献就是让人了解现如今英文essay的良...
评分夜阑人静,睡前翻看《举世公理-- 三十三位名作家论为何读简.奥斯丁》(A Truth Universally Acknowledged-- 33 Great Writers on Why We Read Jane Austen),倒并非报刊上小豆腐块,一天读一两篇,养心怡神,像不间断的热茶疗法。 我很难专心一意对待一位作者,读完书再狗仔背...
评分因为找不到英文原版的,所以买了这本。 话说,每次看到这种精装版的烂书就会压不住怒火。这得浪费多少纸张资源啊!!! 整本书只提供了两个颇有价值的观点,作为一本关于奥斯丁的书来说,时间的投入产出比低到不能再低了。也许这本书最大的贡献就是让人了解现如今英文essay的良...
评分简•奥斯丁在一次参加汉普郡的宴会后,回家拿起笔写道:“波利特太太的裙子十分昂贵,可是,花了这么多钱,她竟然衣不遮体。倒是让我们欣赏了她裙子的花边和平纹细布面料。”跨十八、十九世纪的奥斯丁,大约难以理解我们现今的穿着时尚竞逐“衣不遮体”了,昔日的温婉讽刺...
why the greats read the great
评分C.S. Lewis, Diane Johnson,Ian Watt的很好,Alain De Botton的井井有条,W.Somerset Maugham非常八卦,Woolf的是传统名篇,Byatt那篇其实很透彻,翻译成汉语有一定难度,有两位纽约客作者,都写得不怎么样,不如纽约书评
评分C.S. Lewis, Diane Johnson,Ian Watt的很好,Alain De Botton的井井有条,W.Somerset Maugham非常八卦,Woolf的是传统名篇,Byatt那篇其实很透彻,翻译成汉语有一定难度,有两位纽约客作者,都写得不怎么样,不如纽约书评
评分why the greats read the great
评分虽然是为了论文啃完的 不过书不错~不枉花了那么多银子了。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有