孔飛力(英文名:Philip Alden Kuhn,1933年9月9日-2016年2月15日),生於英國倫敦,1964年獲得哈佛大學博士學位。當費正清1977年從哈佛大學榮休後,孔飛力由已任教十年的芝加哥大學轉迴母校接替其空缺,任哈佛大學曆史係和東亞語言文化係講座教授。他曾擔任過芝加哥大學 遠東語言文化係主任,哈佛大學費正清東亞研究中心主任,哈佛大學東亞研究委員會主席。曾獲得包括古根漢姆學術研究奬在內的多種學術榮譽,是美國藝術人文科學院院士。本書(1990)為他最主要的代錶作,獲“列文森中國研究最佳著作奬”;此外他所著《中華帝國晚期的叛亂及其敵人》(1970)、《中國現代國傢的起源》(2002)和《海外中國人》(2009)等,均有重要深遠的影響。
Midway through the reign of the Ch'ien-lung emperor, Hungli, in the most prosperous period of China's last imperial dynasty, mass hysteria broke out among the common people. It was feared that sorcerers were roaming the land, clipping off the ends of men's queues (the braids worn by royal decree), and chanting magical incantations over them in order to steal the souls of their owners. In a fascinating chronicle of this epidemic of fear and the official prosecution of soulstealers that ensued, Philip Kuhn provides an intimate glimpse into the world of eighteenth-century China. Kuhn weaves his exploration of the sorcery cases with a survey of the social and economic history of the era. Drawing on a rich repository of documents found in the imperial archives, he presents in detail the harrowing interrogations of the accused--a ragtag assortment of vagabonds, beggars, and roving clergy--conducted under torture by provincial magistrates. In tracing the panic's spread from peasant hut to imperial court, Kuhn unmasks the political menace lurking behind the queue-clipping scare as well as the complex of folk beliefs that lay beneath popular fears of sorcery. Kuhn shows how the campaign against sorcery provides insight into the period's social structure and ethnic tensions, the relationship between monarch and bureaucrat, and the inner workings of the state. Whatever its intended purposes, the author argues, the campaign offered Hungli a splendid chance to force his provincial chiefs to crack down on local officials, to reinforce his personal supremacy over top bureaucrats, and to restate the norms of official behavior. This wide-ranging narrative depicts life in imperial China as it was actually lived, often in the participants' own words. "Soulstealers" offers a compelling portrait of the Chinese people--from peasant to emperor--and of the human condition.
与中国人治史不同,西方学者多从社会现状出发,去分析其中的肌理与脉络,对各种不同社会范畴切割与连接,不断深入,凸显社会结构的构成,以及其中矛盾与冲突的深层原因。中国传统史书则惯于一系列材料的纷然罗列,虽巨细靡遗,却缺乏针对史料的有效整理与分析,难以得出叫人...
評分与中国人治史不同,西方学者多从社会现状出发,去分析其中的肌理与脉络,对各种不同社会范畴切割与连接,不断深入,凸显社会结构的构成,以及其中矛盾与冲突的深层原因。中国传统史书则惯于一系列材料的纷然罗列,虽巨细靡遗,却缺乏针对史料的有效整理与分析,难以得出叫人...
評分有一年我因犯了很重的错误,受到组织严厉处分,将我从市机关打发到下面一座县城混饭。那是中国北方的一座滨海小城,人口很少,只有十几万,我住在某政法机关的宿舍里整天不知所措。也就是在那里,时不时听到一个奇怪词语——“拍麻花”或者“盘麻花”,大意是说有一伙怀揣迷药...
評分一、 很少有一本史学著作像美国汉学家孔飞力的《叫魂:1768年中国妖术大恐慌》这样让我念念不忘。这本书我前后翻过好几遍,最近又看了一遍,再次感觉这真的是本不多见的可以推荐给非专业读者的严肃历史研究著作。比经常拿来作类比的黄仁宇(《万历十五年》)和史景迁(《王氏之...
評分与中国人治史不同,西方学者多从社会现状出发,去分析其中的肌理与脉络,对各种不同社会范畴切割与连接,不断深入,凸显社会结构的构成,以及其中矛盾与冲突的深层原因。中国传统史书则惯于一系列材料的纷然罗列,虽巨细靡遗,却缺乏针对史料的有效整理与分析,难以得出叫人...
可能因為盛名之下,略微失望,總體水準仍然很高。如果把最後兩章的內容放到前麵穿插著解讀,並且多寫一些平凡人對權力利用的事情,可能會更好。
评分神作
评分好看
评分可能因為盛名之下,略微失望,總體水準仍然很高。如果把最後兩章的內容放到前麵穿插著解讀,並且多寫一些平凡人對權力利用的事情,可能會更好。
评分神作
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有