This major work retraces the emergence and development of the Bourgeois public sphere - that is, a sphere which was distinct from the state and in which citizens could discuss issues of general interest. In analysing the historical transformations of this sphere, Habermas recovers a concept which is of crucial significance for current debates in social and political theory.
Habermas focuses on the liberal notion of the bourgeois public sphere as it emerged in Europe in the early modern period. He examines both the writings of political theorists, including Marx, Mill and de Tocqueville, and the specific institutions and social forms in which the public sphere was realized.
This brilliant and influential work has been widely recognized for many years as a classic of contemporary social and political thought, of interest to students and scholars throughout the social sciences and humanities.
《公共领域的结构转型》对于法兰克福学派的理论来说是非常具有代表意义的。哈贝马斯在书中阐释了他心目中理想的社会结构,即自由主义经济下公私分明的公共领域范畴。形成这个范畴的前提是私人领域从公共权力机关的指令下彻底解放,从而使政治公共领域充分发展,并与国家机关...
评分我认为哈贝马斯对于公共领域理论的探讨对研究舆论问题、民主等问题有非常重要的借鉴意义,但是不得不承认从这本书中我仍然能感受到一些局限性。哈贝马斯将公共领域化为四个发展阶段其中不乏理想主义的色彩,将公共权力的合法性仅限于由公共领域发展起来的市民社会的意见,同时...
评分rt. 内容现在看已经不新了,但条理清晰结构严密,可以系统性梳理公共领域相关知识,推荐阅读学习。但是曹贝马斯的翻译几乎等同于添乱,不懂德语的同学一定要配合英文版(我用的是Tomas Burger的译本)才不至于理解错误。 专业不是社会学,为论文查资料翻到一句“限制主权(Herr...
评分Liberal model: private people who have autonomy based on private propety acquired in a market consisted of small commodity-exchangers and reflective subjectivity cultivated in the public sphere of literature come together to form a political public sphere i...
评分【按语:《公共领域的结构转型(1961)》是哈贝马斯思想的雏形和灵感发源地,也应该是哈贝马斯最锐利、最左翼、最批判的时期,将社会学和历史学洞察精彩的糅合在一起。虽然哈贝马斯后来另觅资源来挽回此书中的悲观阴郁,但öffenlichkeit/公共性这个概念自始至终都是哈贝马斯...
好想找一找探讨祁克果和哈贝马斯对公共领域不同考虑的文章,now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?
评分好书。
评分好想找一找探讨祁克果和哈贝马斯对公共领域不同考虑的文章,now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?
评分好想找一找探讨祁克果和哈贝马斯对公共领域不同考虑的文章,now that the modern public sphere is radically different from the ancient polis or republic, understanding itself as being outside political power, should we deem mediated public sphere a site of elitist communicative ideal or a dangerous producer of nihilism and detached reflection?
评分好书。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有