Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences. Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy. With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline. Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
更倾向于构建一种综合的理性假设。不是了解理性主义路径全貌的好入门书籍。一刷，之后再转回来二刷
评分更倾向于构建一种综合的理性假设。不是了解理性主义路径全貌的好入门书籍。一刷，之后再转回来二刷
评分更倾向于构建一种综合的理性假设。不是了解理性主义路径全貌的好入门书籍。一刷，之后再转回来二刷
评分更倾向于构建一种综合的理性假设。不是了解理性主义路径全貌的好入门书籍。一刷，之后再转回来二刷
评分更倾向于构建一种综合的理性假设。不是了解理性主义路径全貌的好入门书籍。一刷，之后再转回来二刷
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有