Social services are under pressure from Government and the public to demonstrate the effectiveness of what they do. If the search for useable and relevant measures of effectiveness is to succeed, practitioners, managers, and policymakers must have an understanding of the underlying social science concepts such as Evidence-based practice (EBP). This concept is now promoted as a 'scientific' approach to policy and practice. However, the concept was developed in the field of medicine, and many would ask whether we can safely apply it to the messy process of social problem solving? The promotion of evidence-based practice also has implications for the content and focus of social work education and training, and for the selection and recruitment of staff and students. Evidence-based Practice and Social Work provides a comprehensive overview of developments in this field and highlight many important debates and dilemmas. Writers give clear pointers to the need for a new partnership between research, policy and practice, able to promote effective services. They suggest a more inclusive version of EBP that is better able to respond to the uncertainties of social work practice in the real world. Contents include: An empirical study of the obstacles to evidence-based practice Brian Sheldon, Professor of Applied Social Research/Director, Rupatharshini Chilvers, Annemarie Ellis, Alice Moseley, and Stephen Tierney, CEBSS, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter.The limits of positivism revisited David Smith, Professor of Social Work, Dept of Applied Social Science, University of Lancaster.A problematic relationship? Evidence and practice in the workplace Nick Frost, Senior Lecturer in Continuing Education, University of Leeds.Promoting evidence based practice in a child care charity: The Barnardo's experience Tony Newman, Principal Officer, Research and Development, and Di McNeish, Head of Research, Barnardo's, Cardiff.The Social Care Institute for Excellence: The role of a national institute in developing knowledge and practice in social care Mike Fisher Professor and Director of Research and Reviews, Social Care Institute for Excellence, London.Evidence based social work practice: A reachable goal? Frank Ainsworth, Research Scholar and Lecturer (Adjunct), School of International, Cultural and Community Studies, Edith Cowan University and Patricia Hansen, Head, Department of Social Work, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick.Reframing an evidence-based approach to practice Stephanie Tierney, Research Assistant, CEBSS, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter.What works about what works? Fashion, fad and EBP Carolyn Taylor, Lecturer in Social Work, and Susan White, Senior Lecturer in Social Work, Department of Applied Social Science, University of Manchester
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的深度,远超出了我对一本入门级参考书的预期。它没有停留在表面介绍“什么是循证实践”,而是深入挖掘了其方法论背后的哲学基础和历史演变脉络。书中对于不同实证研究范式(比如随机对照试验、准实验设计在社会工作情境中的适用性与局限性)的探讨尤为深刻,作者清晰地勾勒出了定性研究和定量研究如何在实践中相互融合、彼此赋能的复杂图景。我特别喜欢其中关于“实践者的批判性评估能力”的章节,它不仅教你如何“读懂”研究,更重要的是教你如何“质疑”研究,如何识别研究中的偏见和内在效度的问题。这不仅仅是一本告诉我们“怎么做”的书,更是一本教会我们“为什么这么做”以及“在什么情况下不该这么做”的智慧之书,它将读者从一个被动的信息接收者,提升为了一个主动的知识建构者。
评分这本书的行文风格,在我看来,简直是一场严谨的智力马拉松。作者的叙述语调非常克制,几乎没有使用任何带有强烈感情色彩的形容词或夸张的论断,一切都建立在扎实的实证基础之上。他仿佛是一位冷静的法官,在对一系列社会现象进行审视和剖析,每一个论点后面都紧跟着引文和数据支撑,让人根本找不到任何可以质疑其逻辑链条的缺口。这种近乎苛刻的学术规范,虽然偶尔会让渴望轻松阅读体验的读者感到一丝沉重,但对于我们这些需要将所学知识应用于复杂实践场景的人来说,却是莫大的定心丸。它迫使你慢下来,逐字逐句地去消化其中的精髓,而不是囫囵吞枣地接收结论。读完一个章节,我常常需要停下来,在脑海中将那些理论模型进行重构和内化,这是一种被挑战、被提升的阅读快感。
评分这本书的装帧设计简直是教科书级别的典范,封面选用的那种深沉的藏青色,配合着烫金的书名,既透露出一种专业和权威感,又不会显得过于刻板。翻开内页,那种细腻的纸张质感立刻就能让人感受到出版方的用心,阅读体验极佳。尤其值得称赞的是它的排版布局,每一章节的标题都采用了清晰的层级结构,大量使用的留白设计,让密集的学术论述在视觉上得到了极大的舒缓。我尤其欣赏它在图表和案例插图上的处理方式,那些复杂的统计数据被转换成了直观易懂的流程图和信息图,即便是初次接触这个领域的读者也能迅速抓住核心逻辑。它似乎是为那些对阅读的物理体验有高要求的人群量身定制的,每一次翻阅都像是在进行一场沉浸式的学习旅程,让人忍不住想要一页一页地探索下去。这种对细节的执着,让这本书从众多社工领域的参考资料中脱颖而出,不单单是一本工具书,更像是一件值得珍藏的知识载体。
评分如果用一句话来概括这本书给我带来的感受,那就是“脉络清晰,条理分明,真正能落地”。在实际操作层面上,它提供了大量可供借鉴的实用框架。我关注的那个关于社区干预项目评估的模块,处理得极其细致,从前期的需求评估工具选择,到中期干预过程的实时监控指标设定,再到最终效果的量化与质性反馈的整合,每一步都有清晰的步骤指导和表格示例。这种详尽的、近乎“手把手”的指导,极大地降低了将高阶理论转化为日常工作流程的门槛。对于我所在机构目前正在推进的一个试点项目来说,书中的某个评估矩阵几乎可以直接套用,只需根据我们本地化的特殊情况稍作调整即可。这种高度的可操作性,是许多空泛的理论著作所无法比拟的,它真正体现了“从经验中学习,用证据指导行动”的核心价值。
评分这本书在案例的选择上,展现出了一种国际化和多元化的视野,这一点令我印象深刻。它并非仅仅依赖于北美或西欧的经典案例进行论证,而是巧妙地穿插了来自不同文化背景、处理不同社会问题的具体情境。例如,书中对一个关于移民群体心理健康支持的循证干预模型进行剖析时,其对文化敏感性的强调,远超出了以往我接触的教材。它提醒我们,所谓的“最佳实践”,永远需要放置在特定的社会文化土壤中进行“情境化”的理解和调整。这种对“普适性”与“特殊性”之间辩证关系的深刻洞察,让这本书不仅是一本工具书,更像是一面镜子,映照出我们自身实践中的盲区和需要拓展的边界。读完之后,我的职业视野似乎被拓宽了,对于如何更具同理心地设计和评估干预措施,有了更具包容性和深度的思考。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有