In Prejudicial Appearances noted legal scholar Robert C. Post argues that the true motivation behind anti-discrimination laws should be acknowledged: that they exist not to uphold the inherent dignity of persons but to change society, to make it better and more just. Claiming that the prevailing logic - that of upholding dignity - is misguided, Post lobbies against obscuring the laws' legitimate goals. Each of the four distinguished commentators who respond to Post's evocative essay brings a distinctive perspective to this re-conception. K. Anthony Appiah investigates the logic of stereotyping. Thomas C. Grey examines whether Post's proposal can be reconciled with the values of the rule of law. Questioning whether the law ought to endorse any concept of a social practice that defines persons, Judith Butler explores the tension between post-modern and deconstructive approaches to anti-discrimination. And Reva B. Siegel applies critical race theory to query whether anti-discrimination law's reshaping of race and gender should best be understood in terms of practices of subordination. By representing the variety of views that have been propagated in attempting to reconceive the thrust of anti-discrimination law, both students and scholars interested in the relationships among law, rhetoric, postmodernism, race, and gender will be enriched by Prejudicial Appearances.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Post不同於對於反歧視法占支配地位的blindness解釋，而提齣一種社會學的方案。但正如Grey的懷疑，這種基於不同特定目標的反歧視是否與法律的一般性相矛盾？Butler和Appiah的問題亦很重要，人或群體是否能夠徹底還原為appearance？Post在迴應中似乎承認瞭，一種內在理念的可能性。
评分Post不同於對於反歧視法占支配地位的blindness解釋，而提齣一種社會學的方案。但正如Grey的懷疑，這種基於不同特定目標的反歧視是否與法律的一般性相矛盾？Butler和Appiah的問題亦很重要，人或群體是否能夠徹底還原為appearance？Post在迴應中似乎承認瞭，一種內在理念的可能性。
评分Post不同於對於反歧視法占支配地位的blindness解釋，而提齣一種社會學的方案。但正如Grey的懷疑，這種基於不同特定目標的反歧視是否與法律的一般性相矛盾？Butler和Appiah的問題亦很重要，人或群體是否能夠徹底還原為appearance？Post在迴應中似乎承認瞭，一種內在理念的可能性。
评分Post不同於對於反歧視法占支配地位的blindness解釋，而提齣一種社會學的方案。但正如Grey的懷疑，這種基於不同特定目標的反歧視是否與法律的一般性相矛盾？Butler和Appiah的問題亦很重要，人或群體是否能夠徹底還原為appearance？Post在迴應中似乎承認瞭，一種內在理念的可能性。
评分Post不同於對於反歧視法占支配地位的blindness解釋，而提齣一種社會學的方案。但正如Grey的懷疑，這種基於不同特定目標的反歧視是否與法律的一般性相矛盾？Butler和Appiah的問題亦很重要，人或群體是否能夠徹底還原為appearance？Post在迴應中似乎承認瞭，一種內在理念的可能性。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有