The Cambridge Companion to Allegory pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Rita Copeland, Peter T. Struck (UPENN), Dirk Obbink, Glenn W. Most, Daniel Boyarin, Denys Turner, Peter Heath, Jon Whitman, Kevin Brownlee, Albert R. Ascoli, Stephanie Gibbs Kamath, Nicolette Zeeman, Michael Murrin, Brian Cummings, Blair Hoxby, Theresa M. Kelley, Deborah L. Madsen, Howard Cagill, Steven Mailloux, Lynette Hunter

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Rita Copeland (Editor)

出品人:

頁數:324

译者:

出版時間:2010

價格:GBP 18.99

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780521680820

叢書系列:The Cambridge Companions to Literature and Classics

圖書標籤:

寓言
Critique
西洋古代
西方美學
英語
本雅明
文學理論
德曼

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到圖書目錄大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Allegory is a vast subject, and its knotty history is daunting to students and even advanced scholars venturing outside their own historical specializations. This Companion will present, lucidly, systematically, and expertly, the various threads that comprise the allegorical tradition over its entire chronological range. Beginning with Greek antiquity, the volume shows how the earliest systems of allegory developed in poetry dealing with philosophy, mystical religion, and hermeneutics. Once the earliest histories and themes of the allegorical tradition have been presented, the volume turns to literary, intellectual, and cultural manifestations of allegory through the Middle Ages and Renaissance. The essays in the last section address literary and theoretical approaches to allegory in the modern era, from reactions to allegory in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to reevaluations of its power in the thought of the twentieth century and beyond.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

這是一個介紹性質的文集，主要介紹Allegory 這個美學概念。我對Allegory在古希臘和中世紀的演變興趣不大，所以主要看瞭浪漫主義以後部分，這個部分中浪漫主義時期對象徵／寓言的區分，本雅明在《論德國哀悼劇的起源》和波德萊爾研究係列中對寓言的重新理論化，哥德曼和德曼對寓言的重新從修辭學的角度進行闡釋學的和解構主義的解讀比較重要。本書自身質量不高，有些章節說得很不清楚，但是一個不錯的導讀性的讀物，後麵附有比較長的進一步研究的書單，這對深入研究"寓言"這個美學問題有幫助。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

主要是Glenn Most那篇和Boyarin論Origen的那篇，Bibliography不錯。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

主要是Glenn Most那篇和Boyarin論Origen的那篇，Bibliography不錯。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

主要是Glenn Most那篇和Boyarin論Origen的那篇，Bibliography不錯。