RONALD COASE is Nobel Laureate in Economics. His work has had a profound impact on economics; his work clarified the theory of the firm and gave rise to the field of Law and Economics. The Coase theorem is widely studied in economics. Professor Coase is currently Clifton R. Musser Professor Emeritus of Economics at the University of Chicago Law School, he is also a research advisor at the Ronald Coase Institute. NING WANG is an Assistant Professor as the School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University, USA.
This book examines the extraordinary events that led to China's transformation from a close agrarian socialist economy to becoming an invincible manufacturing powerhouse of the global economy.
科斯和王宁先生对中国变革之路的描述和分析,是比较精准和客观的。从毛某某时代开始,中国走上一条模仿前苏联的计划经济道路,这样的经济体制,是建立在政治权利集中以及社会高度意识形态化的基础之上。实践证明,这样一种经济体系是不合理的,社会经济难以健康发展下去。 中...
评分作者把笔墨重点放在了分析毛时代和邓时代的经济发展史上,援引了较多知名学者的著作和观点,分析得鞭辟入里,可惜对江时代和胡时代的刻画就少了很多,很多历史政策确立的来龙去脉研究得也不够深入,剖析得不算犀利。总的来说是本值得看的好书,从宏观上把握了历史脉络,以客观...
评分1.全面论述边缘革命的概念 2.以“边缘革命”为基础,指出中国改革的二元化结构。不同于官方的宏大叙事,本书强调了民间力量对于改革顶层设计的冲击。深受哈耶克思想的影响。 3.详细论述地方竞争,并指出重复投资带来了知识和技术的扩散,由此引发的收益超过了其造成的资本浪费...
评分全程带着惊叹,科斯对那段历史的了解程度远超想象,没有某些国外学者隔靴搔痒的距离感。一些重要的观点:中国快速崛起,不是因为政府全知全能,而是政府能够承认无知无能;两条改革线,自上而下和自下而上,自下而上的自发改革赢得了自己的地位,而非自始赋予;地方政府间的竞争为政府转型和经济发展提供了重要驱动,虽然重复建设降低效率,但从培养了大量工业化人口和传播知识的角度来看,利或大于弊;还有很多此前未曾想到过的观点,实在受益匪浅,开阔思路,惊觉作为科班出身自己仍然多么刻板和局限。常读常新。
评分抱着拜读学术大作的心情,看完觉得论点无甚惊喜。但细节的确很充实,把建国后的这段历史梳理的很清楚。书最后的自评同意我这说法:“What we have attempted is mainly a historical narrative of the chain of actions that brought it about”。
评分Basically,I thought most of content was written by Coase, but on the contrary, this book not so much taking about institution economics as history. I bet Wang Ning doing the most of the words. And this book is somewhat wordy, just like some Chinese author like Wu XiaoBo, describing the whole story which gives reader a sense of grandeur.
评分跟上一本联系起来,忽然明白why the authority was so nervous when Zhao Ziyang passed away, because Tian’anmen Square Incident was an accident after Hu Yaobang’s death. 但从政治经济的角度来看,这本跟吴晓波的《激荡三十年》联系起来看更好。
评分Basically,I thought most of content was written by Coase, but on the contrary, this book not so much taking about institution economics as history. I bet Wang Ning doing the most of the words. And this book is somewhat wordy, just like some Chinese author like Wu XiaoBo, describing the whole story which gives reader a sense of grandeur.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有