Review
Tragedy in five acts by William Shakespeare, performed in 1605-06 and published in a quarto edition in 1608. One of Shakespeare's finest tragedies, the work displays a pessimism and nihilism that make it a 20th-century favorite. The aging King Lear decides to divide his kingdom among his three daughters, allotting each a portion in proportion to the eloquence of her declaration of love. The hypocritical Goneril and Regan make grand pronouncements and are rewarded; Cordelia, the youngest daughter, who truly loves Lear, refuses to make an insincere speech to prove her love and is disinherited. The two older sisters mock Lear and renege on their promise to support him. Cast out, the king slips into madness and wanders about accompanied by his faithful Fool. He is aided by the Earl of Kent, who, though banished from the kingdom for having supported Cordelia, has remained in Britain disguised as a peasant. Kent brings Lear to Cordelia, who cares for him and helps him regain his reason. The Earl of Gloucester likewise spurns his honest son, Edgar, and believes his conniving illegitimate son, Edmund. Edmund allies himself with Regan and Goneril to defend Britain against the French army mobilized by Cordelia. He turns his father over to Cornwall--who gouges out Gloucester's eyes--then imprisons Cordelia and Lear, but he is defeated in battle by Edgar. Jealous of Edmund's romantic attentions to Regan, Goneril poisons her and commits suicide. Cordelia is hanged. Lear, broken, dies with her body in his arms. -- The Merriam-Webster Encyclopedia of Literature --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Description
This is the first fully annotated, critical edition of King Lear to appear for forty years. It includes a comprehensive account of Shakespeare's sources and the literary, political, and folkloric influences at work in the play, a detailed reading of the action, and a substantial stage history of major productions. Jay Halio is concerned to clarify, for those approaching the play for the first time, the vexed question of its textual history. Unlike previous editions, his does not present a conflation of the Quarto and the Folio. Accepting that we have two versions of equal authority, the one derived from Shakespeare's rough drafts, the other from a manuscript used in the playhouses during the seventeenth century, Professor Halio chooses the Folio as the text for this edition. He explains the differences between the two versions and alerts the reader to the rival claims of the Quarto by means of a sampling of parallel passages in the introduction and by an appendix which contains annotated passages unique to the Quarto.
评分
评分
评分
评分
从语言学的角度来看,这部作品的对话艺术简直达到了登峰造极的境界。那些充满力量感的排比句和精妙的双关语,如同冷兵器时代的交锋,每一句都直指人心,带着锐利的锋芒。不同角色的声音辨识度极高,即便是脱离了角色名称,你也能通过其独特的用词习惯和句法结构,立刻分辨出说话者的身份和心境。这种对“声调”的把握,远超出了仅仅传达信息的层面,它是在通过语言本身构建人物的内在世界。那些关于“眼盲”与“心明”的辩证法,更是通过反复出现的意象和对仗结构,深入骨髓地刻画在读者的脑海中。我甚至开始尝试模仿其中某些段落的韵律,感受那种古典语汇所蕴含的强大节奏感。
评分这部作品最让我感到震撼的是它对“真相”的探讨,它似乎在质疑我们所依赖的认知体系的可靠性。随着故事的推进,现实的界限变得越来越模糊,什么是幻觉,什么是真实的痛苦?作者没有提供一个简单的答案,而是将观众/读者完全抛入到一种认知上的混乱之中,迫使我们去重新审视“看”与“理解”之间的关系。这种对主观经验的挑战,使得这部悲剧拥有了跨越时代的哲学深度。它不只是一个关于一个国王的故事,它更像是一个关于人类如何构建、又如何轻易颠覆自身所建立的秩序的寓言。读完之后,我总会不自觉地审视自己最近所做出的某些重要判断,思考我是基于事实,还是基于被精心包装的表象在行动。
评分初读这部剧作时,我着实被其宏大的悲剧气场所震撼,但随着阅读的深入,我开始关注那些边缘人物的命运,他们如同舞台上的阴影,却投射出最清晰的道德光谱。尤其是那些看似不那么“重要”的角色,他们对忠诚、背叛和公义的坚守或沦丧,构成了对核心悲剧有力的映照。比如,那位始终保持清醒与良知的仆人,他的遭遇简直是为所有不愿同流合污者的献祭。这种多层次的叙事结构,使得作品不仅仅停留在君主覆灭的层面,而是扩展到了对社会秩序、阶级固化下小人物如何挣扎求存的深刻反思。我发现,每次重读,都会有新的角色群像在我脑海中浮现,他们的困境和选择,与我们身处的时代背景产生了奇特的共鸣,让人不禁思考,真正的“愚蠢”和“智慧”究竟该如何界定。
评分这部作品的叙事节奏掌控得极好,它不像有些古典戏剧那样拖沓冗长,反而是紧凑得让人透不过气。从开场的分国土的场景开始,那种基于错误预期的连锁反应,就像推倒第一张多米诺骨牌一样,其后果是不可逆转的加速。作者巧妙地利用了不同场景之间的快速切换,尤其是将宫廷的喧嚣与荒野的孤独进行并置,极大地增强了戏剧张力。我尤其欣赏那种看似不经意的伏笔,它们在故事初期看似无关紧要,却在后半段爆发出了惊人的力量,将所有的线索收束在一起。这使得整个阅读体验成为一种智力上的享受,读者必须时刻保持警惕,才能跟上作者编织的命运之网,稍有走神,可能就会错过一个关键的转折点。
评分这部作品的文字力量简直是无与伦比的,光是那些描绘自然景象的段落,就足以让人屏住呼吸。作者对于暴风雨的刻画,简直是身临其境,狂风的怒吼、闪电的撕裂,仿佛能透过纸页感受到那股原始的、令人敬畏的力量。而与自然伟力形成鲜明对比的,是剧中人物在命运面前的脆弱与挣扎。那些关于判断失误、盲目自大的探讨,深深地触动了我对人性局限性的理解。看着主角如何一步步走向深渊,那种无可挽回的悲剧感,不是简单的情节堆砌,而是基于对权力腐蚀、亲情错位的深刻洞察。我特别欣赏作者在处理复杂情感时的细腻手法,即便是最残酷的场景,也总能找到一丝人性微光,或者更深层次的哲学诘问,让人在阅读后久久不能平静,总想回头再翻阅几遍那些关键的对话,去咂摸其中蕴含的深意。
评分第四遍李尔王,还是惊艳。Roger说Shakespeare knew what he was doing when writing King Lear. Exactly.
评分第四遍李尔王,还是惊艳。Roger说Shakespeare knew what he was doing when writing King Lear. Exactly.
评分太好看,希望19年有大把时间可以读莎士比亚
评分第四遍李尔王,还是惊艳。Roger说Shakespeare knew what he was doing when writing King Lear. Exactly.
评分太好看,希望19年有大把时间可以读莎士比亚
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有