Nassir Ghaemi is a professor of psychiatry at Tufts University School of Medicine and the director of the Mood Disorders Program at Tufts Medical Center in Boston. He trained in psychiatry at, and also serves on the faculty of, Harvard Medical School, and has degrees in history (BA, George Mason University), philosophy (MA, Tufts), and public health (MPH, Harvard). He has published more than a hundred scientific articles and several books on psychiatry.
An investigation into the surprisingly deep correlation between mental illness and successful leadership, as seen through some of history's greatest politicians, generals, and businesspeople.
In A First-Rate Madness, Nassir Ghaemi, who runs the Mood Disorders Program at Tufts Medical Center, draws from the careers and personal plights of such notable leaders as Lincoln, Churchill, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., JFK, and others from the past two centuries to build an argument at once controversial and compelling: the very qualities that mark those with mood disorders- realism, empathy, resilience, and creativity-also make for the best leaders in times of crisis. By combining astute analysis of the historical evidence with the latest psychiatric research, Ghaemi demonstrates how these qualities have produced brilliant leadership under the toughest circumstances.
Take realism, for instance: study after study has shown that those suffering depression are better than "normal" people at assessing current threats and predicting future outcomes. Looking at Lincoln and Churchill among others, Ghaemi shows how depressive realism helped these men tackle challenges both personal and national. Or consider creativity, a quality psychiatrists have studied extensively in relation to bipolar disorder. A First-Rate Madness shows how mania inspired General Sherman and Ted Turner to design and execute their most creative-and successful-strategies.
Ghaemi's thesis is both robust and expansive; he even explains why eminently sane men like Neville Chamberlain and George W. Bush made such poor leaders. Though sane people are better shepherds in good times, sanity can be a severe liability in moments of crisis. A lifetime without the cyclical torment of mood disorders, Ghaemi explains, can leave one ill equipped to endure dire straits. He also clarifies which kinds of insanity-like psychosis-make for despotism and ineptitude, sometimes on a grand scale.
Ghaemi's bold, authoritative analysis offers powerful new tools for determining who should lead us. But perhaps most profoundly, he encourages us to rethink our view of mental illness as a purely negative phenomenon. As A First-Rate Madness makes clear, the most common types of insanity can confer vital benefits on individuals and society at large-however high the price for those who endure these illnesses.
从拿到书开始看,最近正逢情绪略微抑郁,边看边流泪,正如《霸王别姬》中小豆子和小石头在戏院里一样:“他们都怎么成的角儿啊,我什么时候才能成角儿啊!” 读书笔记写在书上了,有机会再誊上来。哦,对了,本书其实只值三星,我打五分是个人的偏爱罢了。
评分从拿到书开始看,最近正逢情绪略微抑郁,边看边流泪,正如《霸王别姬》中小豆子和小石头在戏院里一样:“他们都怎么成的角儿啊,我什么时候才能成角儿啊!” 读书笔记写在书上了,有机会再誊上来。哦,对了,本书其实只值三星,我打五分是个人的偏爱罢了。
评分从拿到书开始看,最近正逢情绪略微抑郁,边看边流泪,正如《霸王别姬》中小豆子和小石头在戏院里一样:“他们都怎么成的角儿啊,我什么时候才能成角儿啊!” 读书笔记写在书上了,有机会再誊上来。哦,对了,本书其实只值三星,我打五分是个人的偏爱罢了。
评分从拿到书开始看,最近正逢情绪略微抑郁,边看边流泪,正如《霸王别姬》中小豆子和小石头在戏院里一样:“他们都怎么成的角儿啊,我什么时候才能成角儿啊!” 读书笔记写在书上了,有机会再誊上来。哦,对了,本书其实只值三星,我打五分是个人的偏爱罢了。
评分从拿到书开始看,最近正逢情绪略微抑郁,边看边流泪,正如《霸王别姬》中小豆子和小石头在戏院里一样:“他们都怎么成的角儿啊,我什么时候才能成角儿啊!” 读书笔记写在书上了,有机会再誊上来。哦,对了,本书其实只值三星,我打五分是个人的偏爱罢了。
funny enough
评分嘿嘿
评分嘿嘿
评分嘿嘿
评分funny enough
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有