康灿雄,美国南加州大学国际关系与贸易教授、韩国研究所主任,曾为跨国公司和政府提供咨询服务。
陈昌煦,北京大学外交学博士,北京大学中国战略研究中心主任助理。
From the founding of the Ming dynasty in 1368 to the start of the Opium Wars in 1841, China has engaged in only two large-scale conflicts with its principal neighbors, Korea, Vietnam, and Japan. These four territorial and centralized states have otherwise fostered peaceful and long-lasting relationships with one another, and as they have grown more powerful, the atmosphere around them has stabilized.
Focusing on the role of the "tribute system" in maintaining stability in East Asia and in fostering diplomatic and commercial exchange, Kang contrasts this history against the example of Europe and the East Asian states' skirmishes with nomadic peoples to the north and west. Although China has been the unquestioned hegemon in the region, with other political units always considered secondary, the tributary order entailed military, cultural, and economic dimensions that afforded its participants immense latitude. Europe's "Westphalian" system, on the other hand, was based on formal equality among states and balance-of-power politics, resulting in incessant interstate conflict.
Scholars tend to view Europe's experience as universal, but Kang upends this tradition, emphasizing East Asia's formal hierarchy as an international system with its own history and character. This approach not only recasts our understanding of East Asian relations but also defines a model that applies to other hegemonies outside the European order.
Eurocentrism is prevalent in developing theories of international relations, most notably exemplified by the central concept of sovereignty in the Westphalian system, which is labeled with equality in interstate relations. David Kang challenges this bias by...
评分有评论说本书史实错误较多,可对于业余读者而言,本书的论述还是让人耳目一新的。在西方歪风传到东亚之前,中、日、韩、越诸国大体上相安无事,基于朝贡体制的外交关系让各国互贸互利,儒家文化更是让各国的价值观趋于一同,倒是西风一吹,让各国不再淡定,特别是民族主义势头...
评分有评论说本书史实错误较多,可对于业余读者而言,本书的论述还是让人耳目一新的。在西方歪风传到东亚之前,中、日、韩、越诸国大体上相安无事,基于朝贡体制的外交关系让各国互贸互利,儒家文化更是让各国的价值观趋于一同,倒是西风一吹,让各国不再淡定,特别是民族主义势头...
评分观点还是挺鲜明的。感觉研究东亚各国关系史最大的麻烦就是是否能找出一个完全覆盖住所有时期所有事例的框架,也就是说,总是有例外出现。不过历史本身就是流动的,朝贡体制就像一件外衣,不可能时时都符合体型。 个人比较赞同东亚各国(尤其是网络上)有关历史文化的争论与冲突...
评分有评论说本书史实错误较多,可对于业余读者而言,本书的论述还是让人耳目一新的。在西方歪风传到东亚之前,中、日、韩、越诸国大体上相安无事,基于朝贡体制的外交关系让各国互贸互利,儒家文化更是让各国的价值观趋于一同,倒是西风一吹,让各国不再淡定,特别是民族主义势头...
Looks who just discovered America in 2010! 要讲历史却毫无历史观,对历史事件的解读太肤浅。我可以接受只讲四国之间的关系,但即使是四国间的变数也已经大到他的理论无法解释,更不用说要apply到整个东亚。在分析壬辰之后的日本对朝心态时竟然引用韩国学者的结论。
评分好问题好框架,但回答得不深入,范围过大。最大的缺陷是把和游牧民族的冲突作为外生变量,开头说江忆恩不对,后来发现不能自圆其说了,又说江有道理……
评分这书怎么说,刚看了几页我就觉得这书看不下去了.典型一瓶子还不满呢,半瓶子就开始咣当的部分美国学者著作的特点.作者一上来就说这不是历史书,是本探讨国际政治的书(有逃避责任的嫌疑),依据的史料大部分不是一手的,是二手的,作者本科研究生专业都是欧洲政治,自己看不懂中日文引用的资料的质和量都令人怀疑,那还搞啥朝贡体系研究.提的问题是很好,可是分析鸦片战争前的东亚国际政治又说这不是关于历史的书,前后矛盾啊~结论部分做的不太好,逻辑链的导出有问题~但是同意结论的观点.
评分stability of hierarchy
评分没看之前就觉得扯淡,看完更觉得是扯淡。一个自承开始项目前连基本常识都不懂的学者,还是算了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有