Philip A.Fisher广受华尔街推崇和敬重。他的投资哲学约四十年前提出,今天,不只金融专业人士仍详加研读并付诸行动,而且被多数人奉为投资理财方面的经典之作。这些哲学收录在《怎样选择成长股》一书。1958年初版,佳评如潮,为投资人必读。
"You will find lots of jewels in these pages that may do as much for you as they have for me."-from the Introduction by Kenneth L. Fisher Forbes columnist Widely respected and admired, Philip Fisher is among the most influential investors of all time. His investment philosophies, introduced almost forty years ago, are not only studied and applied by today's finance professionals, but are also regarded by many as gospel. He recorded these philosophies in Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits, a book considered invaluable reading when it was first published in 1958, and a must-read today. Acclaim for Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits "I sought out Phil Fisher after reading his Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits...When I met him, I was impressed by the man as by his ideas. A thorough understanding of the business, obtained by using Phil's techniques...enables one to make intelligent investment commitments."-Warren Buffett "Little known to the public, rarely interviewed and accepting few clients, Philip Fisher is nevertheless read and studied by most thoughtful investment professionals ...everyone will profit from pondering-as Warren Buffett has done-the investment principles Fisher espouses. "-James W. Michaels Editor, Forbes "My own copy [of Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits] has underlinings and marginal thoughts throughout."-John Train Author of Dance of the Money Bees
刚看完这本《怎样选择成长股》,对于本书的译者冯治平我不得不在此说两句:俗话说“没有金刚钻,不揽瓷器活”可你揽下瓷器活却没金刚钻就实在该骂了!翻译的这是什么狗屁东西,每段话不读个两遍别想看懂,当然更多的部分你看上三四遍也不可能看懂,前言不搭后语···这样的水...
评分 评分 评分我们公认的会计制度和税法,根本不区分这种“资产”和真能提高业务价值的资产,所以股东往往觉得受到不公平待遇;因为盈余没有转移到他们手中,而且看不出保留在企业中的盈余,使他的持股价值增加。保留盈余未能促使利润提高,另一个更重要的原因,起于会计守则存在的缺陷。处...
评分书中所述的选股策略经典且实用,确是价值投资的典范之作。 但可惜,任何价值投资策略得以成功施行的前提:良性的市场环境,亦可称之为“投资者的生态圈”在国内仍旧是天上阁楼。 当我们谈论关于价值投资的选股策略时,所使用的观察市场的放大镜倍数定于微观之中 ,而使我们往...
可能因为比较老了,这些道理在企业管理中都是常识中的常识,再拿来看,就显得有些重复和乏味了。大概在50年代还是比较前卫的吧。又或者是我还不得要领。
评分值得一再重读的书,这并不仅仅是关于股票,还有公司治理最核心的原理
评分如今看起来全是常识,而且说的实在是没必要的绕,扶额…
评分可能因为比较老了,这些道理在企业管理中都是常识中的常识,再拿来看,就显得有些重复和乏味了。大概在50年代还是比较前卫的吧。又或者是我还不得要领。
评分可能因为比较老了,这些道理在企业管理中都是常识中的常识,再拿来看,就显得有些重复和乏味了。大概在50年代还是比较前卫的吧。又或者是我还不得要领。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有