亨利•詹姆斯(Henry James,1843-1916),著名小说家、文艺评论家,心理分析小说的开创者。詹姆斯偏爱“国际小说”的题材,尤其擅长描写清白、丰富、民主的美国与古老、腐朽、堕落的欧洲之间的矛盾。他对人物的内心世界的刻画使他成为20世纪意识流运动的先驱。亨利•詹姆斯的创作生涯无疑是美国文学史上最长、最多产、最有影响的,他是19世纪至20世纪最伟大的散文作家与文体家之一,也被公认为运用小说艺术最巧妙的大师。
THE TURN OF THE SCREW is the greatest and most subtle of all English-language ghost stories. H.P. Lovecraft praised its "truly potent air of sinister menace" and "mounting tide of fright" and subsequent critics have argued long and hard over the central "problem" of the story: if the motifs of the traditional ghost story, in the hands of a master, are used to probe the deepest depths of the human psyche, do the resultant terrors spring from the objective return of the spirits of the dead, or from the fears, memories, and guilt the expectation of such apparitions may evoke? Are there any ghosts in this story at all? James himself might have been puzzled by that question. His own remarks make it clear that what he had in mind was a "sinister romance," inspired by a ghostly story he had heard from an Archbishop of Canterbury. He wrote of the "portentous evil" of the "demon-spirits" in the story, but it was his genius to make them so profoundly mysterious that THE TURN OF THE SCREW will survive any number of interpretations, and go on to chill and delight readers for centuries to come. THE TURN OF THE SCREW was memorably filmed as THE INNOCENTS (1961), arguably the finest cinematic ghost story of all time.
如果在寝室,在厕所,在食堂,在工作闲暇之余,你正打算讲鬼故事。哦,先生女士们,没什么比这里的开头更合适的开场白了。 我敢向你保证,没什么比这还更好的,没有,绝对找不到。翻遍了书店恐怖故事栏你都不会看到,还有什么比这更合适,你再也找不到的。 你可以找找,当然,...
评分这是亨利詹姆斯的大作。 阅读过程几乎没有快感,但却是一本奇特的小说。它的奇特在于,给予了读者不同的阅读走向。 如,女家庭教师究竟有没有看到鬼?鬼魂是否只是出于她的想象?等等。这里很容易产生一些阴谋论的想法。 我不敢说完全看懂了,尤其是它的结局。讲故事的道格...
评分《螺丝在拧紧》的魅力在于1形式结构上:独特的叙事视角:近乎全篇女教师这个不可靠的叙事者,“疯子”的言语总是半真半假,虽然这是回忆,但几乎没有任何反思性的介入和作者客观介入;女教师在寻找真相,读者从女教师寻找真相过程中也在寻找真相,这完美的互相映照;开头引文真...
评分仅作参考,祝大家阅读愉快~ 原文地址:http://www.gezhi.fj.cn/oblog313/user1/Alice/archives/2008/521.html 《螺丝在拧紧》讲述了一个悬念迭起的鬼故事。一千个读者便有一千个哈姆雷特,小说问世来,人们便从各个角度来解读其中的错综复杂。本文则尝试结合弗洛伊德的精神分...
评分Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...
评分Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...
评分Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...
评分Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...
评分Too many adverbial modifiers, too much fussy meditation and ambiguous reflection and overdone clumsy suspenses. Don't see why it's among James' well-received works. I side with critics who consider the narrator insane...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有