From the #1 bestselling author of Fiasco and The Gamble , an epic history of the decline of American military leadership from World War II to Iraq
History has been kind to the American generals of World War II—Marshall, Eisenhower, Patton, and Bradley—and less kind to the generals of the wars that followed. In The Generals , Thomas E. Ricks sets out to explain why that is. In part it is the story of a widening gulf between performance and accountability. During the Second World War, scores of American generals were relieved of command simply for not being good enough. Today, as one American colonel said bitterly during the Iraq War, “As matters stand now, a private who loses a rifle suffers far greater consequences than a general who loses a war.” In The Generals we meet great leaders and suspect ones, generals who rose to the occasion and those who failed themselves and their soldiers. Marshall and Eisenhower cast long shadows over this story, as does the less familiar Marine General O. P. Smith, whose fighting retreat from the Chinese onslaught into Korea in the winter of 1950 snatched a kind of victory from the jaws of annihilation.
But Korea also showed the first signs of an army leadership culture that neither punished mediocrity nor particularly rewarded daring. In the Vietnam War, the problem grew worse until, finally, American military leadership bottomed out. The My Lai massacre, Ricks shows us, is the emblematic event of this dark chapter of our history. In the wake of Vietnam a battle for the soul of the U.S. Army was waged with impressive success. It became a transformed institution, reinvigorated from the bottom up. But if the body was highly toned, its head still suffered from familiar problems, resulting in tactically savvy but strategically obtuse leadership that would win battles but end wars badly from the first Iraq War of 1990 through to the present.
Ricks has made a close study of America’s military leaders for three decades, and in his hands this story resounds with larger meaning: about the transmission of values, about strategic thinking, and about the difference between an organization that learns and one that fails.
[美]托马斯•E. 里克斯(Thomas E.Ricks)
美国军事记者中的“白头海雕”
★ 两次普利策国内新闻报道奖获奖者
★《外交政策》杂志的特约编辑
新美国安全中心研究员、中东问题专家托马斯• E. 里克斯是《华盛顿邮报》的资深军事记者,主要负责报导美国在海外的军事行动。其足迹遍布索马里、海地、朝鲜、科索沃、波斯尼亚、马其顿、科威特、阿富汗、土耳其和伊拉克等国。
早在2000 年,里克斯与其团队写下一系列阐述美军应如何适应21 世纪新需求的文章,他因此获得了普利策奖。2002 年,在详细报导了美国反恐的初期行动后,克里斯再次荣膺普利策奖。
里克斯著有多本畅销书,包括曾雄踞《纽约时报》畅销书榜首的《大败局》(Fiasco),该书曾角逐普利策奖。
無心論證最典型的章節,就是關於巴頓的那一部分,可以簡化成一句話:不論巴頓幹了什麼荒唐事,艾克都因為他是一個戰術天才而保他。 至於為甚麼艾克保巴頓,在美軍體制內絕對屬於「法外開恩」;以及為甚麼要把巴頓歸類到「能戰」一欄裡不算,還要將其拔高到「戰術天才」的程度,...
评分無心論證最典型的章節,就是關於巴頓的那一部分,可以簡化成一句話:不論巴頓幹了什麼荒唐事,艾克都因為他是一個戰術天才而保他。 至於為甚麼艾克保巴頓,在美軍體制內絕對屬於「法外開恩」;以及為甚麼要把巴頓歸類到「能戰」一欄裡不算,還要將其拔高到「戰術天才」的程度,...
评分作者十分推崇”回到马歇尔”,但并没有告诉读者马歇尔军官选拔机制到底是如何运作的,书中能看到的只有马歇尔个人”慧眼识天才“和”不拘一格降人才“的作用,完全不见“体系”的踪影。同时,从几位二战将领的回忆录中,我们能看到的也只是马歇尔个人人脉体系的巨大作用。 我...
评分读完托马斯·E. 里克斯写的《大国与将军》,发现三个问题:1、越南战争美军最大的失败是在自己的人事上;2、对于一个将军而言,批判性的思考比战术思想更为重要;3、美军是有弱点的,是可以打败的,而如果美国吸取了伊拉克战争和阿富汗战争的教训,就不会轻易去动伊朗。
评分本年度,也许是这一个十年,最佳的一本有关美国陆军的严肃图书,主旨为自二战到2010年阿富汗战争为止的美军高层人事问题对美军的影响。 原书内容浅显易懂,详略得当,见解深刻,依托的史料新颖。译文水准及格。全书给人的总体感觉就是小埃德加.普利尔的《十九颗星》、《为将之...
国家也好,军队也好,个人也好,有批判和反思,才能不断进步。
评分国家也好,军队也好,个人也好,有批判和反思,才能不断进步。
评分国家也好,军队也好,个人也好,有批判和反思,才能不断进步。
评分国家也好,军队也好,个人也好,有批判和反思,才能不断进步。
评分国家也好,军队也好,个人也好,有批判和反思,才能不断进步。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有