Malcolm Gladwell is a former business and science writer at the Washington Post. He is currently a staff writer for The New Yorker.
"The best way to understand the dramatic transformation of unknown books into bestsellers, or the rise of teenage smoking, or the phenomena of word of mouth or any number of the other mysterious changes that mark everyday life," writes Malcolm Gladwell, "is to think of them as epidemics. Ideas and products and messages and behaviors spread just like viruses do." Although anyone familiar with the theory of memetics will recognize this concept, Gladwell's The Tipping Point has quite a few interesting twists on the subject.
For example, Paul Revere was able to galvanize the forces of resistance so effectively in part because he was what Gladwell calls a "Connector": he knew just about everybody, particularly the revolutionary leaders in each of the towns that he rode through. But Revere "wasn't just the man with the biggest Rolodex in colonial Boston," he was also a "Maven" who gathered extensive information about the British. He knew what was going on and he knew exactly whom to tell. The phenomenon continues to this day--think of how often you've received information in an e-mail message that had been forwarded at least half a dozen times before reaching you.
Gladwell develops these and other concepts (such as the "stickiness" of ideas or the effect of population size on information dispersal) through simple, clear explanations and entertainingly illustrative anecdotes, such as comparing the pedagogical methods of Sesame Street and Blue's Clues, or explaining why it would be even easier to play Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon with the actor Rod Steiger. Although some readers may find the transitional passages between chapters hold their hands a little too tightly, and Gladwell's closing invocation of the possibilities of social engineering sketchy, even chilling, The Tipping Point is one of the most effective books on science for a general audience in ages. It seems inevitable that "tipping point," like "future shock" or "chaos theory," will soon become one of those ideas that everybody knows--or at least knows by name. --Ron Hogan, Amazon.com
1.流行三要素:传播行为、传播物本身、传播物发挥作用的环境。 2.个别人物法则(Law of the Few):三种关键角色联系员、内行、销售员。联系员维系着大规模的弱联系,是小世界中的社交经纪,他们不会回避对于社交关系的义务,在维持简单、随意、广泛的社交中获得快乐;内行会主...
評分最近韩国的都教授和长腿哥让国内的女粉丝尖叫不已,也让国内的汉子们相当的不服气!咱腿也不短脸也不黑,为啥让俩韩国棒子在咱地盘肆虐捕获无数妹子呢?今天我们就来讨论一下流行的现象,是什么导致事物流行? 其实流行的概念大到时尚、文化传媒和商业界,小到圈子里...
評分这本书的作者格拉德威尔提出一个论点,我们能不能人为的让一件产品,一件事情或者一种观念迅速的流行起来。 要制造流行,首先要了解什么是流行。流行有3个属性特征(Page:xxv),我个人用“流行感冒”来进行映照理解。 特征1,传染性。很容易在人与人之间引起传播。 特...
評分试着将引爆点的理论套用在微博传播中,大致可以分为: 一、个别人物法则 1、联系员:那些人脉广、“粉丝”数量多的人; 2、内行:加V的名人,网络意见领袖,具有号召力的人 3、推销员:微博活跃用户,疯狂刷屏的人,愿意转发分享信息的人 二、附着力法则: 微博内容要有吸引力...
評分最近韩国的都教授和长腿哥让国内的女粉丝尖叫不已,也让国内的汉子们相当的不服气!咱腿也不短脸也不黑,为啥让俩韩国棒子在咱地盘肆虐捕获无数妹子呢?今天我们就来讨论一下流行的现象,是什么导致事物流行? 其实流行的概念大到时尚、文化传媒和商业界,小到圈子里...
也就能哄哄文科生
评分沒有Outliers好,有些例子比較牽強,觀點的清晰度也弱一些。
评分生動,實用。希望記住裏麵的點,以後可以應用。配閤另一本Nudge食用效果更佳。
评分也就能哄哄文科生
评分感覺這本書提齣的理論怎麼套事實都可以...沒有驗證,因為驗證本身就undoable.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有