約翰•H. 阿諾德 東安格利亞大學曆史教師,主要研究方嚮是中世紀史和曆史哲學。
There are many stories we can tell about the past, and we are not, perhaps, as free as we might imagine in our choice of which stories to tell, or where those stories end. John Arnold's Very Short Introduction is a stimulating essay about how we study and understand history. The book begins by inviting us to think about various questions provoked by our investigation of history, and explores the ways these questions have been answered in the past. Concepts such as causation, interpretation, and periodization, are introduced by means of concrete examples of how historians work, giving the reader a sense of the excitement of discovering not only the past, but also ourselves.
A tremendously useful and insightful guide to what history is and is not. Written in extraordinary lucidity not only provides great pleasure in reading, but also inspires deep thinking about history, how it should be studied and why. Highly recommended for ...
評分希罗多德与修昔底德。1.希罗多德的使命:历史学家与文学家之不同在于,写小说的人可以完全虚构人物、时间、地点,乃至超现实的情景;而历史学家则要受制于外在的证据。这也正是希罗多德与荷马的对立所在——前者通过分析荷马史诗中的段落,认为荷马实际上知道某些片段不合实情...
評分阿诺德说,历史是关于曾经存在,但是现在消逝了的人和一段时空。那么,历史学家所做的,就是尝试记录下这一段时空,作为一种记忆。阿诺德又问,谁的记忆?关于什么? 历史学家所书写的历史就是一种重构。那么就得有所依托。其依托,就是从那已经永恒消逝的过去遗留下来的一些线...
評分The history is an argument, and arguments present the opportunity for change.
评分最近幾個月可能都會讀曆史書,先讀一下這本瞭解曆史學,曆史學研究方法,很基礎的層麵也可以。
评分給小孩子看的啓濛讀物,到瞭我這個年紀,裏麵的道理都懂瞭,隻是把自己想說但是說不齣來的話說齣來瞭而已,以至於閱畢並未得甚麼益處。
评分The book is so enjoyable that I suspect I shouldn't be reading it at all.
评分Interesting thoughts.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有