Naming and Necessity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
- 哲学
- 语言哲学
- 分析哲学
- Kripke
- 克里普克
- 形而上学
- Philosophy
- 语言
If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.
This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.
具体描述
读后感
绪言第5页 后来我终于认识到—正是这种认识导致了我在前面提到的 1963 至 1964 年间的工作—对认为通名之间有必然同一性的这种广为接受的观点是不正确的加以反对…… 应为“后来我终于认识到……那种广为接受的、反对通名之间的必然同一性的预设是不正确的”。 正文第95页 如果...
评分本书在不少前辈里得到较高的评价，可晚辈看了半个多月，实在头痛。打听一下，原来都看的是英文版...... 怒了，译本读起来太吃力了，难读到好几次我以为我是在看蓝猫！而事实上这翻译的却像蓝波！ 宁愿看英文了，虽然水平很菜，那也认了，起码不能让中文白痴忽悠了自己
评分在大学里，颇有一部分力薄儒的主业是掩饰自己的愚蠢。我相信这本书就是那群人捧起来的。 跟克里普克是智力低下的表现。 克里普克只是在分析哲学内部，披着分析哲学的外衣，重复近代欧陆哲学的谬误而已。 “所有可能的世界” 这是一个令我当场火冒三丈，至今含恨2年的词组。...
评分很难想象，这个年代的 actualist，能把概念和数学逻辑的关系问题搞成这个模样。 四种数学逻辑理论，指着一个模态理论做。就如同一辆四驱车，只剩下一个轱辘。 这，还不原地画圈儿？？（← 看在傅里叶级数的份儿上，我厚道点儿） 哲学立场，评论标题我已经点明了。详细说说本书...
评分绪言第5页 后来我终于认识到—正是这种认识导致了我在前面提到的 1963 至 1964 年间的工作—对认为通名之间有必然同一性的这种广为接受的观点是不正确的加以反对…… 应为“后来我终于认识到……那种广为接受的、反对通名之间的必然同一性的预设是不正确的”。 正文第95页 如果...
用户评价
懒得看Preface和Addenda了，感觉一些论证诉诸的直觉不够可靠，de re和de dicto我总是想不清楚。哎 看二手文献去了
评分Peter指定的语言哲学文献w花了八节课。最喜欢Lecture2的circularity argument，上课的时候被Kripke的脑回路妙到起鸡皮疙瘩w。Lecture3的theoretical identifications也是我最喜欢的部分，感觉跟上学期的形而上学课对接起来，有种视野很开阔的感觉w。目前进入到Kaplan的阅读，在看Kaplan对Kripke的批评都觉得不那么有力。所以还是非常喜欢这本演讲录的。（这个演讲竟然是Kripke30岁的作品，而20岁的我，还在哲院当废柴，哭了）
评分听kripke讲scientific discovery就像听husserl讲crisis一样，还是去看点krauss吧~
评分这本书有时间一定要好好读。
评分即使跟有些prof讨论，发现他们有人和Kripke的直觉真的也能够做到完全相反（虽然我的intuition完全认同kripke。很refreshing，但intuition的运用真的是建立在nothing better的基础上么？或者说intuition在哲学argument中占据如此主要的立场是否legitimate
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有