Naming and Necessity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
- 哲学
- 语言哲学
- 分析哲学
- Kripke
- 克里普克
- 形而上学
- Philosophy
- 语言
If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.
This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.
具体描述
读后感
绪言第5页 后来我终于认识到—正是这种认识导致了我在前面提到的 1963 至 1964 年间的工作—对认为通名之间有必然同一性的这种广为接受的观点是不正确的加以反对…… 应为“后来我终于认识到……那种广为接受的、反对通名之间的必然同一性的预设是不正确的”。 正文第95页 如果...
评分在集中读德法系的时候穿插读一下英美系的东西，免得想法偏执了。 中译本序 p5 克里普克提出他的历史的，因果的命名理论。按照这种理论，专名是借助于某些与这个名称有关的历史事实去指称某个特定的对象的。 p11 先验命题和必然命题 （如果否认后验的必然命题，就会使得命题独...
评分 评分很难想象，这个年代的 actualist，能把概念和数学逻辑的关系问题搞成这个模样。 四种数学逻辑理论，指着一个模态理论做。就如同一辆四驱车，只剩下一个轱辘。 这，还不原地画圈儿？？（← 看在傅里叶级数的份儿上，我厚道点儿） 哲学立场，评论标题我已经点明了。详细说说本书...
用户评价
Peter指定的语言哲学文献w花了八节课。最喜欢Lecture2的circularity argument，上课的时候被Kripke的脑回路妙到起鸡皮疙瘩w。Lecture3的theoretical identifications也是我最喜欢的部分，感觉跟上学期的形而上学课对接起来，有种视野很开阔的感觉w。目前进入到Kaplan的阅读，在看Kaplan对Kripke的批评都觉得不那么有力。所以还是非常喜欢这本演讲录的。（这个演讲竟然是Kripke30岁的作品，而20岁的我，还在哲院当废柴，哭了）
评分有点四两拨千斤的味道……
评分前两讲真是醍醐灌顶，第三讲并不是不好，只是老师没有讲过看得不是很明白……好读但不好懂的哲学书。
评分浓浓经院风……无感
评分懒得看Preface和Addenda了，感觉一些论证诉诸的直觉不够可靠，de re和de dicto我总是想不清楚。哎 看二手文献去了
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有