Naming and Necessity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
- 哲学
- 语言哲学
- 分析哲学
- Kripke
- 克里普克
- 形而上学
- Philosophy
- 语言
If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.
This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.
具体描述
读后感
绪言第5页 后来我终于认识到—正是这种认识导致了我在前面提到的 1963 至 1964 年间的工作—对认为通名之间有必然同一性的这种广为接受的观点是不正确的加以反对…… 应为“后来我终于认识到……那种广为接受的、反对通名之间的必然同一性的预设是不正确的”。 正文第95页 如果...
评分事物是怎样被命名的？这取决于名称的起源和历史，而不取决于被命名对象的偶然特性。丘吉尔之被命名为“丘吉尔”，不是因其本人的种种特性，而是因其父母的命名以及从此别人这样称呼他而建立的历史传递链条。这就是作者的历史的、因果的命名理论。 哲学史上向来认为，凡先验的都...
评分在大学里，颇有一部分力薄儒的主业是掩饰自己的愚蠢。我相信这本书就是那群人捧起来的。 跟克里普克是智力低下的表现。 克里普克只是在分析哲学内部，披着分析哲学的外衣，重复近代欧陆哲学的谬误而已。 “所有可能的世界” 这是一个令我当场火冒三丈，至今含恨2年的词组。...
评分本书在不少前辈里得到较高的评价，可晚辈看了半个多月，实在头痛。打听一下，原来都看的是英文版...... 怒了，译本读起来太吃力了，难读到好几次我以为我是在看蓝猫！而事实上这翻译的却像蓝波！ 宁愿看英文了，虽然水平很菜，那也认了，起码不能让中文白痴忽悠了自己
评分毕业那段时间把200来页的naming and necessity读完。在这本书中，作者Kripke先是澄清了一些有关指称的问题，接着举了一些例子来说明先验的不一定是必然的，而必然的不一定是先验的。而在最后一节，Kripke才将他在这些逻辑学上的观点应用到心灵哲学这个领域中来。 一开始我还真...
用户评价
其实我觉得即便是empirical investigation的结果也是有historical and social的成分的吧。始终没有办法完全接受rigid designator的设定。但是第三讲扯到身心问题是个蛮不错的动作，虽然基于前面并没有很说服我所以从结果上讲并不是那么满意。但above all these，“迄今为止能够做到的最好”也确实是实证科学的一个特点，从这个角度上讲这本书还是给出了一个很不错的方向。
评分正好在下下周的reading list上，正好轮到我做explanation (´-ι_-｀)
评分Rereading Kripke's groundbreaking classic now. I'd say very "Platonic"
评分浓浓经院风……无感
评分还是有些地方没懂…比如name所具有的那种necessity何以能够活的超出人为约定的必然性…？
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有