Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 哲學 羅蒂 philosophy Rorty 哲學長廊 anti-fundationism Theory Richard
發表於2025-02-11
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2025
還不錯,一如既往的羅蒂式機智。錶象部分講的較淺。
評分還不錯,一如既往的羅蒂式機智。錶象部分講的較淺。
評分a critique of the Platonic-Kantian notion of mind-as-mirror and truth-as-correspondence. the death of epistemology and the birth of hermeneutics. a bit commonsensical for now.
評分還不錯,一如既往的羅蒂式機智。錶象部分講的較淺。
評分除瞭課程內容,雲裏霧裏看瞭一遍,還得看。
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature hit the philosophical world like a bombshell. Richard Rorty, a Princeton professor who had contributed to the analytic tradition in philosophy, was now attempting to shrug off all the central problems with which it had long been preoccupied. After publication, the Press was barely able to keep up with demand, and the book has since gone on to become one of its all-time best-sellers in philosophy.
Rorty argued that, beginning in the seventeenth century, philosophers developed an unhealthy obsession with the notion of representation. They compared the mind to a mirror that reflects reality. In their view, knowledge is concerned with the accuracy of these reflections, and the strategy employed to obtain this knowledge--that of inspecting, repairing, and polishing the mirror--belongs to philosophy. Rorty's book was a powerful critique of this imagery and the tradition of thought that it spawned. He argued that the questions about truth posed by Descartes, Kant, Hegel, and modern epistemologists and philosophers of language simply couldn't be answered and were, in any case, irrelevant to serious social and cultural inquiry. This stance provoked a barrage of criticism, but whatever the strengths of Rorty's specific claims, the book had a therapeutic effect on philosophy. It reenergized pragmatism as an intellectual force, steered philosophy back to its roots in the humanities, and helped to make alternatives to analytic philosophy a serious choice for young graduate students. Twenty-five years later, the book remains a must-read for anyone seriously concerned about the nature of philosophical inquiry and what philosophers can and cannot do to help us understand and improve the world.
记得1990年前后在学校图书馆里借这本书来看,是因为先看了涂纪亮《分析哲学及其在美国的发展》,里面最后介绍的人物就是罗蒂。但是那时看这本书根本看不懂的,只是享受于全神贯注绞尽脑汁的硬啃过程。还回去之后过了些天觉得不过瘾,又借出来一次。算是那时我比较钟爱的一本书...
評分记得1990年前后在学校图书馆里借这本书来看,是因为先看了涂纪亮《分析哲学及其在美国的发展》,里面最后介绍的人物就是罗蒂。但是那时看这本书根本看不懂的,只是享受于全神贯注绞尽脑汁的硬啃过程。还回去之后过了些天觉得不过瘾,又借出来一次。算是那时我比较钟爱的一本书...
評分约翰霍普金斯大学的哲学系主任米歇尔·威廉姆斯作为一个资深的知识论学者,他常年与怀疑论作战。除此之外,他还要想方设法为“认识论”提供建设的合法性之辩护。威廉姆斯作为知识论的捍卫者,不免与罗蒂的观点相左。然而二者长久以来就是好朋友,有互相批评当然也激荡起学术界...
評分约翰霍普金斯大学的哲学系主任米歇尔·威廉姆斯作为一个资深的知识论学者,他常年与怀疑论作战。除此之外,他还要想方设法为“认识论”提供建设的合法性之辩护。威廉姆斯作为知识论的捍卫者,不免与罗蒂的观点相左。然而二者长久以来就是好朋友,有互相批评当然也激荡起学术界...
評分6月8日在上海,我是第一次从王鸿生先生那里知道了罗蒂。回来后,有一天小康在她的书店里帮我找到了罗蒂的一本书,是他1979年的一个作品,《哲学和自然之镜》。现在知道,就是8日,他因胰腺癌及并发症在加州帕罗奥多家中去世,享年75岁。书刚在看,这里只引他的一小段话: “...
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2025