"Defacement" asks what happens when something precious is despoiled. It begins with the notion that such activity is attractive in its very repulsion, and that it creates something sacred even in the most secular of societies and circumstances. In specifying the human face as the ideal type for thinking through such violation, this book raises the issue of secrecy as the depth that seems to surface with the tearing of surface. This surfacing is made all the more subtle and ingenious, not to mention everyday, by the deliberately partial exposures involved in "the public secret"--defined as what is generally known but, for one reason or another, cannot easily be articulated. Arguing that this sort of knowledge ("knowing what not to know") is the most powerful form of social knowledge, Taussig works with ideas and motifs from Nietzsche, William Burroughs, Elias Canetti, Georges Bataille, and the ethnography of unmasking in so-called primitive societies in order to extend his earlier work on mimesis and transgression. Underlying his concern with defacement and the public secret is the search for a mode of truth telling that unmasks, but only to reenchant, thereby underlining Walter Benjamin's notion that "truth is not a matter of exposure of the secret, but a revelation that does justice to it."
Old topic, new vision not so anthropological, but a hybridity of social theory and philosophical ideas possibly skewed by several misreadings of Hegel and Nietzsche.
评分Old topic, new vision not so anthropological, but a hybridity of social theory and philosophical ideas possibly skewed by several misreadings of Hegel and Nietzsche.
评分Old topic, new vision not so anthropological, but a hybridity of social theory and philosophical ideas possibly skewed by several misreadings of Hegel and Nietzsche.
评分Old topic, new vision not so anthropological, but a hybridity of social theory and philosophical ideas possibly skewed by several misreadings of Hegel and Nietzsche.
评分Old topic, new vision not so anthropological, but a hybridity of social theory and philosophical ideas possibly skewed by several misreadings of Hegel and Nietzsche.
SOAN 330
评分SOAN 330
评分SOAN 330
评分行文太过于随意,很容易让人看了一大段艰涩的废话以后失去兴趣,但偶尔又出现妙语,总之断断续续看了近一个月,过程痛苦到我宁肯去读德里达。
评分SOAN 330
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有