Shanthi Kalathil is an associate in the Information Revolution and World Politics Project at the Carnegie Endowment. Previously, she was a Hong Kong-based staff reporter for The Asian Wall Street Journal. She has written extensively on the political impact of the information revolution in developing countries.

Taylor C. Boas is pursuing a Ph.D. in political science at the University of California, Berkeley.

Review

"...fascinating and extremely useful." -- The Washington Monthly

"...provides a timely, welcome and overdue counter to simplistic claims for the politically liberating effects of the Internet." -- Survival

"An important guide to scholars and policymakers concerned with understanding the conditions under which the Internet may foster democratic change." -- Larry Diamond, Hoover Institution, Stanford University

"Must reading for anyone interested in learning from evidence, rather than widely accepted assumptions, how influence of Internet is used." -- The ZGram

"Their research is solid, their analysis stimulating, and their findings should make us pause, rethink, and refocus." -- David Ronfeldt, coauthor of Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy

Product Description

As the Internet diffuses across the globe, many have come to believe that the technology poses an insurmountable threat to authoritarian rule. Grounded in the Internet's early libertarian culture and predicated on anecdotes pulled from diverse political climates, this conventional wisdom has informed the views of policy makers, business leaders, and media pundits alike. Yet few studies have sought to systematically analyze the exact ways in which Internet use may lay the basis for political change.

In Open Networks, Closed Regimes, the authors take a comprehensive look at how a broad range of societal and political actors in eight authoritarian and semi-authoritarian countries employ the Internet. Based on methodical assessment of evidence from these cases—China, Cuba, Singapore, Vietnam, Burma, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt—the study contends that the Internet is not necessarily a threat to authoritarian regimes.