From Scientific American
Who knew that elephant trunk tastes like piglet? Or that more than a millennium ago, a writer declared that Chinese "competed to eat their trunks, the taste of which is said to be fatty and crisp, and to be particularly well suited to being roasted." Elephants, it turns out, once roamed across nearly all of China, as did rhinoceroses. Indeed, for 1,000 years the standard armor worn by Chinese soldiers was made from rhino hide. Yet these days rhinos are completely extinct in China, and elephants linger only in protected enclaves in the far southwest of the country. China being China, everything has been carefully documented, so we know that these large mammals retreated gradually over the past 4,000 years, half a step ahead of smaller, two-legged ones. Mark Elvin, an Australian scholar, brilliantly uses that prolonged elephantine trail of tears as the guiding metaphor for his new book, The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China. Frankly, I didn't know that I was interested in the history of Chinese elephants, or that I was yearning for an environmental history of China, until I read this book. But Elvin combines an illuminating account of the 4,000-year-long collision of humans and nature with delightful tidbits about everything under the Chinese sun. One could not have written such an environmental history about, for instance, Britain or Russia. From China's point of view, such countries are modern ingenues with barely any history to speak of. But in China, we hear, for example, that the Duke of Zhou, more than 3,000 years ago, drove "elephants far away" from the Yellow River valley. A record from 548 B.C. describes the ivory trade, and later we begin to get detailed accounts of battles over crops between peasants and elephants in, say, A.D. 962. Of course, just because something has been recorded does not mean it is true. One account from 1608 reports of trained elephants in the Ming Dynasty court: "If an elephant commits an offense, or injures a human, the imperial command will be issued for him to be beaten.... Only when the beating has been concluded will he rise to his feet to give thanks for the favor received.... In the sixth lunar month they are bathed and mated. The coupling takes place in the water with a female who floats with her face upward, in all respects like a human being." Hmmm. Floating face upward? So that's how Ming Dynasty historians made love. Elvin is particularly fascinating on the history of China's long wrestling match with water. Chinese civilization may have evolved out of efforts to irrigate the land, and there is an intriguing record of the quest to tame water and land, which would typically succeed for a while until the water rebelled. The problems were especially acute with the Yellow River, which was not called that in ancient times. Then, a little more than two millennia ago, the Qin and Han dynasties promoted farming along the upper reaches of the river, and the resulting erosion filled the water with sediment that made it muddy and gave it its present name. The sediment raised the riverbed until it was held in place only by man-made dikes that required constant attention--because the water, in essence, flowed aboveground, not below it. Periodically dikes broke, sometimes catastrophically. A flood in 1117 is said to have killed more than one million people, making it perhaps the worst such disaster since Noah. The Yellow River dramatically changed course in 1194, moving to the south of the Shandong Peninsula, until in 1853 it moved north again. Elvin meticulously recounts China's hydrology, so we learn, for example, that between 1195 and 1578 the Yellow River delta advanced only 39 meters a year (as sediment built up), whereas from 1579 to 1591 it advanced 1,538 meters a year. Sometimes the sheer weight of detail is numbing, particularly in later chapters offering case studies within China. Readers without an intrinsic fascination with China may find this a book to browse, not to read cover to cover. But as a window into the history of the Middle Kingdom, and an extended account of human interactions with the environment, this is a magisterial work. What gives this book special resonance is the impact China will have on the global environment in the coming decades. The industrial revolution in the West has been so destructive of nature that we should be wary of what the industrialization of China and India will mean. I congratulate my Chinese friends when they buy their first cars, one after the other, but collectively the result of Chinese industrialization will be to swallow up nonrenewable resources, to increase carbon emissions and presumably global warming, and to send acid rain drizzling down on much of the globe. Yet this book does not really illuminate the road ahead. Elvin tells us that it was originally intended to carry us to the present day, but he ends up pretty much grinding to a halt a couple of hundred years ago. The even more gruesome period since--and, brace yourself, the predations still ahead of us--will have to be the subject of a companion volume. Alas, the Chinese elephants have already been driven to the country's fringe and have nowhere else to go. And unless they figure out how to mate even when the female is not floating faceup in a pool of water, they're really in trouble.
Nicholas D. Kristof is a columnist for the New York Times. He won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of China and is co-author, with his wife, Sheryl WuDunn, of China Wakes: The Struggle for the Soul of a Rising Power.
Book Description
This is the first environmental history of China during the three thousand years for which there are written records. It is also a treasure trove of literary, political, aesthetic, scientific, and religious sources, that allow the reader direct access to the views and feelings of the Chinese people towards their environment and their landscape. Elvin chronicles the spread of the Chinese style of farming that eliminated the habitat of the elephants that populated the country alongside much of its original wildlife; the destruction of most of the forests; the impact of war on the environmental transformation of the landscape; and the re-engineering of the countryside through water-control systems, some of gigantic size. He documents the histories of three contrasting localities within China to show how ecological dynamics defined the lives of the inhabitants. And he shows that China in the eighteenth century, on the eve of the modern era, was probably more environmentally degraded than northwestern Europe around this time. Indispensable for its new perspective on long-term Chinese history and its explanation of the roots of China's present-day environmental crisis, this book opens a door into the Chinese past.
作者:(英)伊懋可 编者:刘东 译者:梅雪芹、毛利霞、王玉山
伊懋可(Hark Elvin),1938年生于英国剑桥,剑桥大学毕业。1990年任澳大利亚国立大学亚太研究院中国史教授。曾在格拉斯哥大学、牛津大学、巴黎高师和海德堡大学任教,在哈佛大学做过访问研究员。主要著作有:《中国历史的模式》、《另一种历史:从一个欧洲人的视角论中国》、《华人世界变化多端的故事》,合编了《中国文化图集》、《积渐所至:中国环境史论文集》,还发表了署名为约翰·达顿(John Dutton)的小说《圣伊莱斯集市》和《虎岛》。
今天的中国境内,仅在云南边境的零散保护区内才能看到野生大象的踪迹,但在历史上,它的分布却广泛得多——河南省的简称“豫”,便是因远古时代有野象而得名“豫州”,殷商时代常有捕猎野象之举,但三千多年来随着土地的开发和气候变化,大象逐渐退向西南的角落。“大象的退却...
评分首先,纵观全书,虽然作者试图用大的脉络线索串联起不同部分间的叙事,但总体而言,相较于一本系统性的环境史著作,更像是一本论文集。当然,文献记载以来四千年,环境史的资料驳杂零散,难以耙梳整理,不能做过多苛求。只是书目以“一部中国环境史”如此宏观的题目作为副标题...
评分英国环境史教授伊懋可的大作——《大象的退却:一部中国环境史》——出版了中文版。看名字就让人兴味盎然,大象是有趣的动物,甲骨文里就有“象”字,《吕氏春秋》里说“商人服象,为虐于东夷”,说明至少在商代时黄河流域还生活着众多大象。另外,河南省的简称“豫”字,就是...
评分客观的学术之风应与国界无关 —《大象的退却:一部中国环境史》读后感 《大象的退却:一部中国环境史》是英国环境史教授伊懋可的大作,而看到作者之名时的我却想到了三毛。原名陈懋平的三毛,因嫌原名中的"懋"字太难写而改名为陈平。如今,一名英国人...
评分客观的学术之风应与国界无关 —《大象的退却:一部中国环境史》读后感 《大象的退却:一部中国环境史》是英国环境史教授伊懋可的大作,而看到作者之名时的我却想到了三毛。原名陈懋平的三毛,因嫌原名中的"懋"字太难写而改名为陈平。如今,一名英国人...
这本书的叙事结构简直是鬼斧神工,作者对时间线的掌控炉火纯青,让人仿佛置身于一个迷宫之中,却又总能找到柳暗花明的出口。故事并非线性展开,而是如同碎片化的记忆不断闪回、交织,这种处理方式极大地增强了故事的张力和悬念。特别是当一些看似不相干的线索,在故事的后半程如同精密仪器中的齿轮般完美啮合时,那种豁然开朗的震撼感,是许多故作高深的文学作品所无法企及的。我特别欣赏作者在刻画人物内心挣扎时所采用的细腻笔触,那种对人性幽微之处的捕捉,精准得令人心悸。例如,主角在面对道德困境时的那种犹豫、自欺与最终的自我救赎,作者没有简单地给出对错的标签,而是将整个过程摊开在读者面前,任由我们去评判,去感受。这种开放式的处理,使得读者在合上书本之后,仍会久久地沉浸在对情节和人物命运的思索之中。文字的密度非常高,每一个词语似乎都经过了反复的锤炼和打磨,绝无半点赘余,却又充满了诗意的韵味。它不是那种快餐式的阅读体验,而更像是一场需要全身心投入的智力与情感的盛宴,挑战着读者的理解力和耐心,但回报是丰厚的。
评分这本书的语言风格简直像是一场酣畅淋漓的爵士乐即兴演奏,充满了不可预测的节奏变化和令人惊喜的转调。它的句式长短交错,时而如同一股奔腾的洪流,一口气将你冲到故事的高潮;时而又突然放缓,如同清晨的薄雾,在某个意象上停留许久,让你细细品味。我特别欣赏作者在描绘感官体验时的那种天赋,不仅仅是视觉,还有那些难以言喻的触觉、听觉的细节,它们被精确地捕捉并转化为文字,赋予了文本一种近乎立体的质感。阅读它时,我总有一种在观看一部艺术电影的感觉,画面感极强,光影的对比运用得恰到好处,烘托出人物复杂的情绪。它成功地避开了那种矫揉造作的抒情,而是通过对具体场景和行为的冷静观察,自然而然地流露出深沉的情感。这种克制而又充满力量的表达方式,使得情感的爆发点更具冲击力,让人在不经意间就被深深触动,泪流满面,却又说不清是为何而哭。
评分这是一部需要被“体验”而非仅仅是“阅读”的作品。它不像一本教科书那样提供明确的答案,反而更像一面被精心打磨的魔镜,映照出读者自身隐藏的恐惧与渴望。书中对权力结构、社会等级的讽刺是如此的尖锐和毫不留情,但作者并没有停留在简单的批判层面,而是深入剖析了这种结构如何扭曲和异化了人与人之间的基本连接。我读到一半时,曾产生一种强烈的代入感,仿佛自己就是书中那个身处夹缝、挣扎求存的小人物,那种无力和愤懑几乎要穿透纸面。作者对于人性的复杂性有着近乎残忍的洞察力,好人身上有阴影,恶人身上也闪烁着微弱的人性光辉,这种灰度的描绘,让角色无比真实可信。它迫使我重新审视自己对“正义”和“邪恶”的刻板认知。最终,它留给我的不是一个故事的结局,而是一系列关于我们身处的世界如何运作的深刻疑问,这种后续的思考价值,才是衡量一部伟大作品的真正标尺。
评分我必须承认,这本书的阅读门槛着实不低,它毫不留情地考验着读者的专注力。开头部分,信息的密度过大,角色众多且名字拗口,情节错综复杂,一度让我感到有些气馁,甚至想放下它,转而寻求一些更轻松的作品。但是,一旦熬过了最初的“适应期”,你会发现自己已经一脚踏入了作者精心编织的藤蔓丛林中,越深入越是惊叹于其错综复杂的美感。作者似乎对哲学思辨有着近乎偏执的热爱,大量的内心独白和对“存在”、“时间”本质的探讨,穿插在看似日常的对话和事件之中,毫不突兀。这种哲学层面的探讨,极大地提升了作品的厚度。它不像一些流于表面的励志读物,而是直击生存的本质,探讨我们如何与自己的局限性共处,如何定义“成功”和“失败”。这种深度,让这本书超越了一般的叙事文学,带有一种寓言式的力量,它不是在讲述一个故事,而是在提出一个深刻的问题,并邀请读者参与到这场永恒的辩论中。
评分这是一部关于失落与记忆的史诗,虽然它并未直接描绘宏大的历史场景,但字里行间流淌出的那种沧桑感和时代的悲凉,却深刻地烙印在了我的脑海里。作者构建了一个极具地域特色和文化深度的世界观,那些关于传统习俗、地方方言甚至是气味和光线的描绘,真实到让人几乎可以伸手触摸。读到某些关于世代传承的家族秘密被揭开时,我感到一种强烈的共情,仿佛自己也参与了那段尘封的历史。整本书的基调是沉郁的,带着一种宿命般的无奈,但恰恰是这种沉郁,衬托出了那些转瞬即逝的美好瞬间的珍贵。我尤其喜欢作者对“环境”的拟人化处理,那些古老的建筑、荒芜的田野,它们仿佛成为了故事的另一个无声的见证者和参与者,它们的气息、它们的沉默,都在与角色进行着无声的对话。阅读过程更像是一次考古挖掘,需要我不断地向下探寻,清理掉表层的浮尘,才能看到底下掩埋的真相和情感的矿脉。它提醒了我,有些东西一旦消逝,就再也无法挽回,那种永恒的缺憾感,是任何新的事物都无法填补的空洞。
评分2010
评分c's rec
评分借大象杯酒,浇农业与经济发展之块垒
评分这本书注定会成为中国环境史的经典,但是这位老先生的文笔太艰深了。
评分旁征博引,笔触宏大。但是读起来略觉得有点过了。主题很清楚,就是中国人与其自然环境的关系,对它的改造及其背后的动因。选了三个地方,不知道代表性如何。从本质上讲,一切人类活动都与自然争利。还能体会到我们中国人爱种地,干扰我们种地我们是会变得很凶的。总之,视角有意思,蛮好玩的作品。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有