Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965 B. Locke At first glance Locke seems to reject altogether Hobbes's notion of natural law and to follow the traditional teaching. 【总论点:洛克对霍布斯的隐蔽继承】 Yet Lo...
评分越往后读,越明白施特劳斯为什么在开篇处反对所谓历史主义:他批评近代政治哲学家太强调描述人,而忽视了人的应该,忽视了人所具有的能够达到高贵的潜能——所以此书以抨击历史主义和韦伯的价值中立开篇。因为历史主义相当于放弃了他想捍卫的那个超越时代的绝对的、客观的自然...
评分权利与善不是先后问题,而是从属问题,如桑德尔所言,权利并不独立于善。 现代权利论的核心是平等。随历史的发展,平等待人成为重要的善。 此书中,感觉施氏的观点是隐晦的,这种隐晦不是说他的抨击不明确,他抨击历史主义和价值中立都很明确,只是抨击过后,要建立什么?回到...
评分[美]列奥·施特劳斯 著.彭刚 译.自然权利与历史[M].三联书店.2003 导论 1. 法定 实在的权利positive是排斥自然权利的 2 2. 当代对自然权利的拒绝导向了虚无主义——不,它就等同于虚无主义 5 3. 当前科学对自然权利的拒绝主要是从历史的角度,从事实和价值的分野来拒绝的 9 序...
评分列奥.斯特劳斯:“我认为韦伯的论点必然导致虚无主义,或者导致以下观点,即每种偏好,无论怎样的邪恶、卑鄙或疯狂,在理性法庭的面前和任何其他偏好一样都被判定为正当的”。 虽然“价值中立”者说他们只是在学术研究的过程中持“中立”立场,但实际上,由于他们把价值和信仰...
神书之“神”总是有两层微妙的含义……可以是大神也可以是神棍。漫漫无期的读书会~重新又读一遍了,笑点颇多。
评分????5/29/20
评分写paper最痛苦的一天
评分The change of the meaning of "natural right" from classical to modern thought is accompanied by the establishment of a human-centric cosmology. Man becomes the judge and legislator of his own, not because of his reason but because of his desire & passion. By replacing "history process" for "the end", modern political philosophy falls into nihilism.
评分文笔不错
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有