Visions of Politics (Volume 1) pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Quentin Skinner is Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Christ's College.
- 劍橋學派
- 政治思想史
- 政治哲學
- Quentin_Skinner
- 斯金納
- 方法論
- 思想史
- 政治學
The first of three volumes of essays by Quentin Skinner, one of the world's leading intellectual historians. This collection includes some of his most important philosophical and methodological statements written over the past four decades, each carefully revised for publication in this form. In a series of seminal essays Professor Skinner sets forth the intellectual principles that inform his work. Writing as a practising historian, he considers the theoretical difficulties inherent in the pursuit of knowledge and interpretation, and elucidates the methodology which finds its expression in his two successive volumes. All of Professor Skinner's work is characterised by philosophical power, limpid clarity, and elegance of exposition; these essays, many of which are now recognised classics, provide a fascinating and convenient digest of the development of his thought. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
具體描述
讀後感
斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
評分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
評分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
評分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
評分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
用戶評價
The dispute between the Cambridge School and the Straussians arises not so much from different methods of interpretation as from their contrasting aims in reading the ancients. Strauss reads them to learn from their wisdom, Skinner reads them to congratulate himself on his own intelligence.
评分補標：讀於2018鞦 “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory；57-89”應當是這本書裏最重要的方法論的文章。Skinner二十多歲時的銳氣和現在非常不同，以至於他還需要之後寫一篇文章矯正說自己之前的言辭太過於鋒利——裏麵有不少snarky的玩笑。Skinner關注的是寫作者的意圖，可以說是以史為鑒看春鞦筆法。
评分啓發頗大。
评分寫法略嫌重復，四和八精彩。基於contextualization、speech act以及更廣義的語言學/修辭學討論的方法論一種。斯金納健筆如椽，條分縷析的功夫、尤其是辨析他人多有所混淆的地方非常厲害。Intro結尾太有力，簡直是對語言、甚至對書寫最深情的告白。"The plea is to recognise that the pen is a mighty sword...We may be freer than we sometimes suppose."至於某個朝令夕改的國度，大約充斥著“paradiastolic redescription”吧。
评分This is a must-read for those who are interested in how to do intellectual history. Skinner explains what his historical contexualism is. He propounded an interesting explanation on the difference between intention and motivation. Intention is what one has in his/her mind when one does something. Motivation is the preceding event.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有