作者巴特•D•埃爾曼是基督教史的專傢,以研究新約和早期教會著稱於美國學術界。現為北卡羅來納大學教堂山分校宗教研究所講座教授。埃爾曼曾是虔誠的福音派教徒,立誌作為知名學者以傳播福音,在研究過程中逐漸相信《聖經》文本的誤傳,認識到《聖經》是曆史的産物,是經過人們所改變的,後成為一名不可知論者。
When world-class biblical scholar Bart Ehrman first began to study the texts of the Bible in their original languages he was startled to discover the multitude of mistakes and intentional alterations that had been made by earlier translators. In Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman tells the story behind the mistakes and changes that ancient scribes made to the New Testament and shows the great impact they had upon the Bible we use today. He frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultraconservative views of the Bible. </p>
Since the advent of the printing press and the accurate reproduction of texts, most people have assumed that when they read the New Testament they are reading an exact copy of Jesus's words or Saint Paul's writings. And yet, for almost fifteen hundred years these manuscripts were hand copied by scribes who were deeply influenced by the cultural, theological, and political disputes of their day. Both mistakes and intentional changes abound in the surviving manuscripts, making the original words difficult to reconstruct. For the first time, Ehrman reveals where and why these changes were made and how scholars go about reconstructing the original words of the New Testament as closely as possible. </p>
Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our cherished biblical stories and widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself stem from both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes -- alterations that dramatically affected all subsequent versions of the Bible. </p>
《製造耶穌》這本書所呈現的學術水平是紮實的,寫作方式也很流暢,讓讀者能夠清楚的明白他的論證。我認為這本書最重大的貢獻就如同作者自己所說的,是讓一般人能夠接觸到學術界老早就已經知曉的事情:我們沒有聖經的原稿。對於基要派和福音派信徒來說,此書無疑對他們的信仰是...
評分从基要派到mainline,从查经班到神学院,巴老师不是一个人在战斗…… 我相信很多人都经历过这些,只是不一定最终转向不可知论。 这本书对信仰的冲击真的有么?有的,如果你是基要派,除非你掩耳不听,否则这些内容会devastating.对于基要派来说,发现圣经中的讹误,哪怕是一丁...
評分艾氏在北卡大学教授《新约》及早期基督教有年,著述极勤,文风活泼,还常上电视,在美国圣经学界可算个公众人物。他的书若能准确地译为中文,对于学界和普通读者,都是一件功德。 艾氏在别处多次声明,放弃基督教,跟在普林斯顿神学院接受现代圣经学知识与历史批判方法没关系...
評分真实的耶稣可能更像健次郎,而不是托奇。个别一两个瞬间亦有拉奥的影子。其实耶稣今天这种理想化的形象和西方人的文化习惯有极大的关系。崇拜个体的权柄,人格化的神,塑造耶稣至柔的形象是对这种至刚的补偿。
評分《错引耶稣》的作者是一个宗教的权威学者,曾是《时代》杂志封面人物。 引人入胜的序言,几乎第一时间就让我进入了阅读的状态。 对没有宗教信仰的人,充分的满足了对宗教的好奇:为什么信?信什么?如何信?为什么不信? 作者年轻时即信仰基督,除了家庭和社会环境原因,主要是...
兩三年瞭,終於拜讀。與考古佐證不同,文本梳理的爭議更大,內容更枯燥。難得此書,對我這個非信徒,也顯得文字通暢。
评分熟悉版本校勘學的讀者可能會覺得有些老生常談的東西作者在不厭其煩地掰開揉碎瞭反復強調,而真正具體的哪些段落被後世篡改的例子有些太少瞭(大大小小林林總總有10個左右例子吧,都很精彩)。但是考慮到作者的目的在於現身說法,破除原教旨的聖經無誤論,似乎就可以原諒瞭,隻希望作者能齣續集,詳細談談新約版本學裏更多的“公案”。
评分通過讀一流學者寫的普及讀物瞭解一個陌生的領域是一件很有趣的事。Ehman教授帶我們透過文本研究,使用校勘的手段,發掘基督教傳播的早期曆史以及當時一係列重要的神學爭論。讀來津津有味。
评分鬍適說中國先秦以後,印度佛學重塑瞭哲學思想史。我想說,鳩摩羅什一個人實際是中國人的精神教宗,也就是一個印度人把中國改造瞭,而中國人並不自知。
评分但凡基督徒都應該讀一下????
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有