作者巴特•D•埃爾曼是基督教史的專傢,以研究新約和早期教會著稱於美國學術界。現為北卡羅來納大學教堂山分校宗教研究所講座教授。埃爾曼曾是虔誠的福音派教徒,立誌作為知名學者以傳播福音,在研究過程中逐漸相信《聖經》文本的誤傳,認識到《聖經》是曆史的産物,是經過人們所改變的,後成為一名不可知論者。
When world-class biblical scholar Bart Ehrman first began to study the texts of the Bible in their original languages he was startled to discover the multitude of mistakes and intentional alterations that had been made by earlier translators. In Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman tells the story behind the mistakes and changes that ancient scribes made to the New Testament and shows the great impact they had upon the Bible we use today. He frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultraconservative views of the Bible. </p>
Since the advent of the printing press and the accurate reproduction of texts, most people have assumed that when they read the New Testament they are reading an exact copy of Jesus's words or Saint Paul's writings. And yet, for almost fifteen hundred years these manuscripts were hand copied by scribes who were deeply influenced by the cultural, theological, and political disputes of their day. Both mistakes and intentional changes abound in the surviving manuscripts, making the original words difficult to reconstruct. For the first time, Ehrman reveals where and why these changes were made and how scholars go about reconstructing the original words of the New Testament as closely as possible. </p>
Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our cherished biblical stories and widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself stem from both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes -- alterations that dramatically affected all subsequent versions of the Bible. </p>
《错引耶稣》的作者是一个宗教的权威学者,曾是《时代》杂志封面人物。 引人入胜的序言,几乎第一时间就让我进入了阅读的状态。 对没有宗教信仰的人,充分的满足了对宗教的好奇:为什么信?信什么?如何信?为什么不信? 作者年轻时即信仰基督,除了家庭和社会环境原因,主要是...
評分谬误也能引人归向真理,只要是寻求真理的人. 说圣经是是非非,说了上千年了,现在的种种说法也鲜有新鲜的,无非是冷饭拼盘.然而,真正寻求或者驳斥的人不是依靠书本而是依靠考古发现的.当你认定一个东西的时候自然更多的听取那些和你胃口的. 既然如此,推荐另一本基于考古发现的说圣...
評分1,凡经作者之手必有个人意见,《福音书》作者尚且如此,何况本书作者? 而作者已经成为“不可知论者”,对书必有影响。但是这本书的支撑与主体是实例而非意见,何必对“作者意见”多有攻讦?攻讦之言,与书中内容,何者更客观? 2,窃以为本书对于信仰并无过多动摇。会有人因...
評分非常精彩的宗教历史! 这本书讲述了圣经从《旧约》到《新约》的各种版本的迭代历史。作者是专门研究《圣经》版本历史的,他曾经也是虔诚的基督信徒,自从上大学,就动摇了他的信念,变成了一个无神论者。他为了研究《圣经》(最早的版本是古希腊、拉丁语),专程跑到“梵蒂冈”...
評分谬误也能引人归向真理,只要是寻求真理的人. 说圣经是是非非,说了上千年了,现在的种种说法也鲜有新鲜的,无非是冷饭拼盘.然而,真正寻求或者驳斥的人不是依靠书本而是依靠考古发现的.当你认定一个东西的时候自然更多的听取那些和你胃口的. 既然如此,推荐另一本基于考古发现的说圣...
熟悉版本校勘學的讀者可能會覺得有些老生常談的東西作者在不厭其煩地掰開揉碎瞭反復強調,而真正具體的哪些段落被後世篡改的例子有些太少瞭(大大小小林林總總有10個左右例子吧,都很精彩)。但是考慮到作者的目的在於現身說法,破除原教旨的聖經無誤論,似乎就可以原諒瞭,隻希望作者能齣續集,詳細談談新約版本學裏更多的“公案”。
评分但凡基督徒都應該讀一下????
评分熟悉版本校勘學的讀者可能會覺得有些老生常談的東西作者在不厭其煩地掰開揉碎瞭反復強調,而真正具體的哪些段落被後世篡改的例子有些太少瞭(大大小小林林總總有10個左右例子吧,都很精彩)。但是考慮到作者的目的在於現身說法,破除原教旨的聖經無誤論,似乎就可以原諒瞭,隻希望作者能齣續集,詳細談談新約版本學裏更多的“公案”。
评分鬍適說中國先秦以後,印度佛學重塑瞭哲學思想史。我想說,鳩摩羅什一個人實際是中國人的精神教宗,也就是一個印度人把中國改造瞭,而中國人並不自知。
评分但凡基督徒都應該讀一下????
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有