James C. Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrariane, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seei Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Cong Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistancendition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Be: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia.ing Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia." He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Science" He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper. s and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper.
Weapons of the Weak is an ethnography by James C. Scott that studies the effects of the Green Revolution in rural Malaysia. One of the main objectives of the study is to make an argument that the Marxian and Gramscian ideas of false consciousness and hegemony are incorrect. He develops this conclusion throughout the book, through the different scenarios and characters that come up during his time of fieldwork in the village. This publication, based on 2 years of fieldwork (1978-1980), focuses on the local class relations in a small rice farming community of 70 households in the main paddy-growing area of Kedah in Malaysia. Introduction of the Green Revolution in 1976 eliminated 2/3 of the wage-earning opportunities for smallholders and landless laborers. The main ensuing class struggle is analyzed being the ideological struggle in the village and the practice of resistance itself consisting of: foot-dragging, dissimulation, desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance and sabotage acts. Rich and poor are engaged in an unremitting if silent struggle to define changes in land tenure, mechanization and employment to advance their own interests, and to use values that they share to control the distribution of status, land, work and grain.
这是一本写于20多年前的著作,在其译为中文的短短几年里,却因其有趣的主题,被众多学科心照不宣地引为重要的参考书目,这些学科不但包括人类学、政治学,还有“三农问题”等等研究领域。 与同时代受“越南战争和左翼学术界对民族解放战争迷恋的刺激下”诞生的诸多作...
评分 评分斯科特以一个马来西亚村庄中的政治斗争为例来分析宏大的国家级阶级斗争,我以为这本身就是一个失误。正如斯科特自己所注意到的,村庄共同体不同于国家共同体,村庄共同体有许多很有强度的其他关系弄混了所谓的“阶级之水”,包括亲戚、朋友、派系、民族等,实际上阶级仅仅是利...
评分如何在数据,一面之词和社会生活中找到可靠的逻辑,斯科特提供了一个优秀的范本。值得多读几遍。(为什么评论短一点就不可以?)
评分《弱者的武器》成书结构 A两个故事延伸出话题 B将社会学的想象力实证出来。介绍广阔的社会背景,力图在历史的纵向和横向环境中描摹出社会的全貌,经济的、社会的、文化的。 C在B的细致社会中,将以往被人们忽视的农民们一些上不得台面的行为,定义为斗争,并确定它们的表现形式...
Scott想借着农民那些“磨洋工”式的抗争,说明老马的意识形态理论,和葛兰西的霸权理论,都是有问题的。意识形态不意味着全面的思想控制,甚至不意味着底层民众对于权贵阶层合法性的认同,它只是限制了人们对于社会变革可能性的认识。而抗争并不一定需要一个很彻底的good sense,在某种条件下,磨洋工式的抵抗也能给社会带来根本性的变革。这个人的书总是给人一种乍一看很有趣但又很经不起琢磨的感觉。一下子还说不好问题在哪里。但比起《国家的视角》还是好了很多。
评分Scott是我最喜欢的政治人类学家,也是他让我了解原来政治学研究可以这样做。
评分Scott想借着农民那些“磨洋工”式的抗争,说明老马的意识形态理论,和葛兰西的霸权理论,都是有问题的。意识形态不意味着全面的思想控制,甚至不意味着底层民众对于权贵阶层合法性的认同,它只是限制了人们对于社会变革可能性的认识。而抗争并不一定需要一个很彻底的good sense,在某种条件下,磨洋工式的抵抗也能给社会带来根本性的变革。这个人的书总是给人一种乍一看很有趣但又很经不起琢磨的感觉。一下子还说不好问题在哪里。但比起《国家的视角》还是好了很多。
评分"euphemization of economic power," critics of hegemony, resistance/conflicts within hegemony, inevitability does not equal legitimacy, interesting talk on the concentration camp (homo sacer?), hegemony gives raw materials of resistance, utopia as negation of the present, ANARCHISM not liberalism (ambition/vaguard party is not required), etc.
评分[PKU/E2-1]D423.38/Sco84|文化中心。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有