Russell和Whitehead的Principia在当代思想史的评价看来简直是吃力不讨好的典范。罗素从1899年开始想这样一个project,到1910年写完,同一个project写了整整11年。而如今我们记得的都是他失败的地方——首先是1903年的set theoretical paradox,其次是1910年type theory的繁琐和...
评分这篇可能不能算是书评,只是我的一些感想吧,也许不能给没看过此书的人什么参考。但是想吼一声…… 我实在太敬仰罗素这个人了,如果不是因为有罗素这样一个人,我会觉得自己决不会赞同、敬仰、崇拜一个人到这种地步。 书中不少地方由于历史和文化背景不熟悉而没有理解,大量引...
评分What do I think of Russell's Autobiography? by HartmannJG52 a.k.a. 哈特曼 For Chinese readers, Russell is well known for his work "A history of western philosophy". But the work that brought him the earliest fame is "Principia mathematica". In fact, Rus...
评分What do I think of Russell's Autobiography? by HartmannJG52 a.k.a. 哈特曼 For Chinese readers, Russell is well known for his work "A history of western philosophy". But the work that brought him the earliest fame is "Principia mathematica". In fact, Rus...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有