薩義德(1935-2003)，當今世界極具影響力的文學與文化批評傢之一。齣生於耶路撒冷，在英國占領期間就讀於埃及開羅的西方學校，接受英式和美式教育，1950年代赴美就學，獲哈佛大學博士學位，1963年起任教於哥倫比亞大學，講授英國文學與比較文學。代錶作有：《開始：意圖與方法》、《世界·文本·批評傢》、《東方學》、《文化與帝國主義》、《知識分子論》、《巴勒斯坦問題》等。薩義德還是有名的樂評傢、歌劇學者、鋼琴傢，並以知識分子的身份積極參與巴勒斯坦的政治運動，為巴勒斯坦在西方世界最雄辯的代言人。

In his fascinating last book, Edward Said looks at a selection of essays, poems, novels, films, and operas to determine what late style may explain about the evolution of the creative life. He discusses how the approaching death of an artist can make its way “with anachronism and anomaly” into his work, as was the case in the late work of Thomas Mann, Richard Strauss, Jean Genet, Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa, and C. P. Cavafy. Said examines Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis, Genet’s Le captif amoureux and Les paravents, Mozart’s Così fan tutte, Visconti’s film of Lampedusa’s The Leopard, Euripides’ The Bacchae and Iphigenia at Aulis, and Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice, among other works.

He points out that one can also find an “unearthly serenity,” in last works, for example, in Sophocles, Shakespeare, Rembrandt, Matisse, Bach, and Wagner, which, as Said puts it, “crown a lifetime of aesthetic endeavor.” But in On Late Style he concentrates on artistic lateness as “intransigence, difficulty, and unresolved contradiction.” He also writes about Theodor Adorno and about Glenn Gould, who chose to stop performing, thereby creating his own form of lateness. Said makes clear that most of the works discussed are rife with deep conflict and an almost impenetrable complexity. In fact, he feels that lateness is often “a form of exile.” These works frequently stood in direct contrast to what was popular at the time, but they were forerunners of what was to come in each artist’s particular discipline—works of true genius.

Eloquent and impassioned, brilliantly reasoned and revelatory, On Late Style is Edward Said’s own great last work.