Language As Symbolic Action pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:University of California Press

作者:Kenneth Burke

出品人:

页数:532

译者:

出版时间:1968-7-1

价格:USD 38.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780520001923

丛书系列:

图书标签:

• KennethBurke
• 修辭
• 修辞
• 经典
• 哲学
• rhetoric
• dramatism
• Kenneth_Burke
• 语言符号行为
• 社会互动
• 语用学
• 符号学
• 语言哲学
• 文化表达
• 言语行为
• 意义建构
• 语言功能
• 社会结构

《语言作为象征性行动》 这本书深入探讨了语言的本质，将其视为一种超越单纯交流工具的、动态的、具有塑造力的行动。它并非一本关于语言学分类或语法规则的枯燥手册，而是一次对语言在人类社会、思想和文化中扮演角色的深刻洞察。作者带领读者穿越语言的层层帷幕，揭示隐藏在其表象之下的强大力量。 在核心，本书将语言理解为一种“象征性行动”。这意味着，我们使用的每一个词语，每一个句子，不仅仅是传递信息，更是在构建现实、表达意图、塑造关系、影响认知。语言并非被动地反映世界，而是主动地参与创造世界。例如，我们如何描述一个事件，会直接影响我们对该事件的理解，甚至可能影响未来我们如何对待类似事件。我们称呼某人，或是以何种方式称呼，都会在无形中建立起一种关系模式。 本书从多个维度剖析了语言的“行动”属性。首先，它强调了语言的 目的性。我们说话，总是为了达到某种目的，无论是告知、说服、请求、安慰，还是表达情感。这些目的驱动着我们选择特定的词汇、语调和句子结构。理解语言的目的是理解语言行动的关键。 其次，它探讨了语言的 情境性。同一个词语，在不同的情境下，其含义和引发的反应可能截然不同。作者会通过大量的案例分析，展示语言在特定语境中的微妙运作，以及这些运作如何影响我们对现实的感知和判断。这包括了对语用学、话语分析等领域的深入解读，但并非以学术术语堆砌，而是以生动直观的方式呈现。 第三，本书着重于语言的 建构性。语言不仅描述，更构建。我们如何组织语言，如何使用比喻、隐喻，如何叙述故事，都在不断地塑造我们对自我、他人以及世界的认知框架。书中会深入探讨，例如，政治演讲如何通过语言来凝聚共识或制造分裂，广告如何通过语言来影响消费者的欲望，以及个人如何通过叙述来构建和维护自己的身份。 本书的独到之处在于，它摆脱了将语言视为一种纯粹的逻辑工具的狭隘视角。作者认为，语言充满了情感、价值和意图，这些因素深刻地影响着语言的生成和接受。因此，理解语言的“行动”，就必须理解这些非理性、非逻辑的层面。这使得本书具有了更强的实践意义，它能帮助读者更敏锐地察觉到身边语言的运作方式，更有效地运用语言，以及更深刻地理解他人的话语。 书中可能会包含以下几个方面的探讨： 语言与权力: 探讨语言如何被用来维护、挑战或重塑权力结构。例如，特定术语的使用，官方话语的构建，以及对某些声音的压制或放大。 语言与身份: 分析语言在个人和社会身份构建中的作用。我们的方言、口音、用词习惯，都可能成为我们身份认同的标志，而语言的使用方式也影响着我们如何看待自己和被他人看待。 语言与说服: 深入研究语言的修辞策略、说服技巧，以及它们如何影响人们的信念和行为。这可能涉及到对广告、政治辩论、宣传等领域的分析。 语言与情感: 探讨语言如何承载和传递情感，以及情感如何塑造我们对语言的理解和表达。例如，语气、语调、委婉语、禁忌语等。 语言与误解: 分析导致语言交流失败和误解的根源，并提出改善沟通的可能途径。这可能涉及到对文化差异、认知偏差等方面的讨论。 《语言作为象征性行动》是一本引人入胜的书，它将挑战你对语言的固有认知，为你打开一扇通往更深层次理解世界的大门。无论你是语言爱好者、沟通实践者，还是对人类行为和社会运作感兴趣的读者，都能从中获得深刻的启发和宝贵的洞见。它鼓励我们重新审视每一个字词，因为每一个字词都可能是一次行动，一次塑造，一次连接。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

读到“Language As Symbolic Action”这个名字，我脑海中瞬间浮现出无数个与语言相关的场景，但这本书给我的感觉，远非简单的语言学探讨。它似乎指向了一种更深层次的、关于人类存在与行动的理解。我尝试去想象，作者会如何定义“象征”？它仅仅是词语背后的意义，还是包含着更广阔的文化、历史、社会背景下的联想和指代？而“行动”又意味着什么？是语言输出本身，还是语言引发的连锁反应，包括思想的改变、情感的波动，甚至是实际的行为？我非常期待书中对这些核心概念的细致梳理，希望能看到作者如何构建一个逻辑严谨的理论框架，将语言的象征性与行动性紧密地联系起来。这本书会不会涉及到符号学，或者传播学中的一些理论？我猜测作者可能会引用一些经典的符号学理论，例如索绪尔的符号理论，或者皮尔士的三元符号模型，来解释语言符号的二元对立或三元关系，并在此基础上进一步阐述其“行动”的维度。我希望书中不会仅仅停留在理论层面，而是能够通过丰富的案例，例如儿童语言习得过程中的象征游戏，或者特定社会群体内部形成的语言习惯，来展示语言作为象征性行动的生动实践。我尤其好奇，作者会如何处理语言的模糊性、多义性以及其不断演变性，这些特性是如何与“象征性行动”的内涵相契合的？我期待这本书能带我走出对语言的传统认知，看到它更具力量、更具生命力的另一面，理解语言如何在无声无息中塑造我们的世界，并在行动的层面上产生深远的影响。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

“Language As Symbolic Action”——这 judul 触动了我内心深处对于语言本质的好奇。我一直认为，语言不仅仅是沟通的工具，更是一种构建现实、塑造认知的媒介。这本书的名字，似乎将这种观点推向了一个新的高度，强调了语言作为一种“象征性行动”的力量。我迫切想知道，作者会如何定义“象征”？它是否包含了词语本身所承载的意义，还是更广泛地指向了文化、历史、社会背景下的联想和隐喻？而“行动”又意味着什么？是语言本身的输出，还是它所引发的思维、情感甚至行为上的改变？我希望这本书能够提供深刻的见解，解释语言的象征性是如何转化为一种实际的“行动”力量的。我期待作者能够运用丰富的案例，从文学、政治、日常生活等多个维度，来印证他的理论。例如，文学作品中人物的语言如何塑造其性格，政治演讲中的措辞如何影响听众的情绪，以及日常交流中微妙的语言变化如何影响人际关系。我尤其感兴趣的是，作者是否会探讨语言的非理性一面，例如幽默、讽刺、夸张等，这些看似“不直接”的语言形式，是如何通过其象征性的运作，达到其特定的“行动”效果的？我猜想，这本书可能会涉及一些心理学或社会学上的概念，来解释语言如何触及我们的潜意识，如何影响我们的判断和决策。总而言之，这本书的名字已经在我心中勾勒出了一幅关于语言力量的宏大图景，我期待它能为我带来一场深刻的认知革命。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

When I saw the title "Language As Symbolic Action," I was immediately intrigued. It’s not a title that suggests a dry, academic treatise. Instead, it hints at a dynamic and profound exploration of what language truly is and how it functions in our lives. I’ve always felt that language is more than just a tool for conveying information; it’s a force that shapes our thoughts, our perceptions, and ultimately, our reality. This book seems to promise a journey into that very force. I’m eager to understand how the author defines "symbolic" in this context. Does it refer to the inherent meanings of words, or does it encompass the broader cultural, historical, and emotional associations that words carry? And what does "action" entail? Is it simply the act of speaking or writing, or does it extend to the consequences of those linguistic acts – the changes they instigate in our minds, our feelings, and our behaviors? I’m hoping for a deep dive into how these symbolic elements of language translate into tangible actions. I anticipate the author will use a rich tapestry of examples, drawing from literature, politics, and everyday interactions, to illustrate their points. For instance, how do the linguistic choices of a character in a novel reveal their inner turmoil? How do the carefully crafted phrases in a political speech sway public opinion? And how do seemingly minor linguistic nuances in daily conversations impact interpersonal relationships? I’m particularly curious about the author’s perspective on the more subtle, perhaps less rational, aspects of language, such as humor, irony, or exaggeration. How do these forms of expression, which might not be overtly direct, exert their influence through symbolic means? I suspect the book might touch upon psychological or sociological concepts to explain how language affects our subconscious and influences our decision-making processes. In essence, the title has painted a grand picture of language’s power in my mind, and I eagerly await the profound cognitive shift it promises.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

"Language As Symbolic Action" – this title immediately sparks my imagination and suggests a departure from conventional views of language. I've always felt that language is more than just a tool for conveying information; it's a fundamental aspect of human experience that actively shapes our understanding of ourselves and the world around us. This book seems to propose that language is inherently performative, that our use of words is not merely descriptive but is, in itself, a form of action. I am deeply curious about the author's interpretation of "symbolic." Will it focus on the arbitrary nature of linguistic signs, or will it delve into the deeper, often culturally embedded, layers of meaning and association that words accumulate? And what does it mean for language to be an "action"? Is it the immediate impact of an utterance, or does it refer to the broader, perhaps even transformative, consequences of our linguistic engagements? I anticipate that the book will offer a rich exploration of how these symbolic aspects of language translate into tangible actions, whether they are cognitive, emotional, or behavioral. I am looking forward to insightful case studies that illustrate this concept in diverse contexts – perhaps examining how historical narratives are constructed through symbolic language, or how marketing strategies leverage symbolic associations to influence consumer behavior, or even how therapeutic dialogue employs symbolic reframing to promote healing. I am particularly interested in the potential for language to construct or deconstruct social realities. How does the way we talk about certain groups, for instance, shape our perceptions and subsequent interactions with them? The title promises a thought-provoking journey into the active role language plays in our lives, and I am eager to see how the author unpacks this compelling idea.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title "Language As Symbolic Action" immediately struck a chord with me. It hints at a profound exploration of how we use words not merely to describe the world, but to actively shape it, and in doing so, shape ourselves. I’ve always been fascinated by the power of language, its ability to evoke emotions, convey complex ideas, and even alter perceptions. This title suggests a deeper understanding of that power, viewing language as an inherently active force. I am particularly eager to understand how the author defines "symbolic" in relation to language. Is it about the established meanings we assign to words, or does it extend to the rich tapestry of cultural associations, historical baggage, and emotional undertones that words carry? And what does it mean for language to be an "action"? Is it simply the act of speaking or writing, or does it refer to the consequences of our linguistic choices – the impact they have on our thoughts, our feelings, and our subsequent behaviors? I hope the book will provide illuminating examples that demonstrate this "symbolic action" in practice. I imagine it will explore how, for instance, political rhetoric uses carefully chosen symbols to mobilize populations, how literature uses symbolic language to explore the human condition, or how everyday conversations, through their subtle symbolic exchanges, build or break relationships. I'm also very curious to see if the author will address how language can be used to frame issues, thereby influencing how we perceive them, and consequently, how we act upon them. This could involve exploring concepts like framing theory or the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, albeit from a new angle focusing on action. The title has certainly set a high bar for intellectual engagement, and I'm eager to discover the insights it holds about the very nature of our linguistic existence.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

这本书的名字非常引人注目，“Language As Symbolic Action”，光是这个书名就足以勾起我的好奇心。我一直对语言的本质以及它在人类社会中的作用深感着迷。这本书似乎提供了一个全新的视角，让我不仅仅把语言看作是传递信息的工具，而是更深入地理解它作为一种动态的、象征性的行动，如何在塑造我们的思维、行为乃至整个现实世界中发挥作用。我期待在这本书中，作者能够深入剖析“象征”在语言中的具体体现，以及这种“象征性行动”是如何被个体和社会所理解、运用和发展的。更重要的是，我希望能在这本书中找到关于语言如何影响我们的认知结构，如何构建我们对世界的理解，以及如何通过语言来操纵、影响甚至改变他人观点的深刻见解。作者是否会探讨不同文化背景下，语言象征性的差异及其带来的交流挑战？我对此非常好奇。我设想这本书会深入分析语言的隐喻、修辞等修饰性成分，揭示它们如何在潜移默化中塑造我们的情感和判断。同时，我希望作者能够提供一些具体的案例分析，来佐证他的理论，让我能够更直观地理解“语言即象征性行动”这一概念的实际应用。比如，政治演讲、广告宣传、文学作品中的语言运用，它们是如何通过象征性的力量来达成其目的的。这本书的书名本身就给我一种哲学思辨的预感，我期待着它能提供一些关于语言的本体论和认识论上的深刻思考，让我重新审视语言在我们生活中的地位和作用。我甚至猜想，作者可能会触及语言与权力、语言与意识形态之间的复杂关系，探讨语言如何成为一种社会控制的工具，或者相反，如何成为反抗和解放的力量。这本书的名字让我充满了探索的欲望，我迫切地想知道作者将带领我进入一个怎样的语言哲学世界。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title "Language As Symbolic Action" immediately grabbed my attention with its promise of a dynamic and insightful exploration of language. It suggests that language is not merely a passive conveyor of information, but an active force that shapes our reality and our interactions within it. I'm incredibly curious about how the author will define and illustrate the "symbolic" nature of language. Does it encompass the agreed-upon meanings of words, or does it delve into the more nuanced layers of cultural context, historical resonance, and emotional undertones that words acquire? Furthermore, the term "action" suggests a focus on the consequences and impacts of linguistic utterances. I eagerly anticipate understanding how these symbolic elements of language translate into tangible actions, whether they are cognitive, emotional, or even societal. I imagine the book will be rich with examples that demonstrate this concept in various domains. Perhaps it will analyze how literary works use symbolic language to explore complex human experiences, or how political discourse employs symbolic rhetoric to influence public opinion and mobilize action. I am also particularly interested in how the author might address the performative aspect of language – how certain linguistic acts can create new realities, shape identities, or influence decision-making processes. The title hints at a profound understanding of language’s role in human agency, and I am excited to delve into this exploration of how our words actively shape our world.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

The title "Language As Symbolic Action" immediately captured my attention, promising a perspective far beyond mere linguistic analysis. It suggests a lens through which language is viewed not as a static system of signs, but as a potent, dynamic force that actively shapes our world and ourselves. I'm deeply curious about how the author will unpack the concept of "symbolic." Does it refer to established semantic meanings, or will it delve into the more complex layers of cultural resonance, historical context, and emotional weight that words acquire? And the "action" component – what kind of action are we talking about? Is it the mere utterance of words, or does it encompass the ripple effects of language: the alterations in our thought processes, the shifts in our emotional states, and even the instigation of physical behaviors? I am particularly keen to discover how the author bridges the gap between the symbolic nature of language and its consequential "action." My expectation is that the book will be replete with illustrative examples, drawing from diverse fields such as literature, rhetoric, and social discourse, to substantiate its claims. For instance, how does the language employed in a piece of poetry evoke a particular emotional response? How do the rhetorical strategies in a persuasive argument influence an audience's beliefs? And in everyday conversations, how do subtle linguistic choices contribute to the formation or dissolution of relationships? I am especially drawn to the possibility of exploring the more nuanced and often indirect ways in which language operates, such as through satire, metaphor, or even silence. How do these less overt forms of communication harness their symbolic power to achieve specific communicative goals? It’s possible the author might weave in insights from fields like philosophy of mind or semiotics to illuminate the intricate relationship between language, cognition, and action. Ultimately, the title has ignited a strong desire to explore the profound implications of language as a fundamental mode of human action.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

“Language As Symbolic Action”——这个书名让我有一种身临其境的感受，仿佛我将要踏上一段探索语言内在力量的旅程。我并非语言学专业的学生，但我一直以来都对人类的交流方式以及语言如何影响我们的思维模式抱有浓厚的兴趣。这本书的名字暗示了一种全新的视角，不再将语言视为静态的符号系统，而是将其理解为一种动态的、具有能动性的“行动”。我期待作者能够深入阐释“象征”在语言中的具体角色，它如何承载着文化、历史和情感的重量，又如何通过精巧的组合，形成强大的意义场域。同时，“行动”一词让我遐想，语言是否就像一种无形的双手，能够触及我们的内心，改变我们的认知，甚至引导我们的行为？我希望书中能有大量的实例分析，比如文学作品中人物的对话如何揭示其内心挣扎，政治宣传中口号的运用如何激发民众的情感，或者日常对话中无心之语如何引发误会和冲突。我渴望看到作者如何将这些零散的观察，整合成一个 coherent 的理论体系，阐明语言的象征性如何转化为实际的行动力量。这本书会不会探讨语言的非理性一面，比如幽默、讽刺、戏谑，这些看似“不那么直接”的语言形式，实际上是如何通过象征性的运作，达到其特定的“行动”效果的？我猜想，作者或许会涉及一些心理学或社会学的概念，来解释语言如何影响我们的潜意识，如何左右我们的决策。总之，这本书的名字已经在我心中播下了好奇的种子，我期待它能够打开我新的认知之门，让我以一种前所未有的方式去理解语言。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

"Language As Symbolic Action" – a title that immediately resonates with my long-held belief that language is far more than a simple communication tool. It’s a fundamental aspect of human existence, a mechanism through which we construct meaning, forge identities, and interact with the world. This book's title suggests an exploration of language’s inherent power, portraying it not just as something we use, but as something that *does*. I’m eager to understand the author’s definition of "symbolic" in this context. Does it relate to the arbitrary nature of signs, as explored in structural linguistics, or does it encompass the rich, often culturally-bound, associations and connotations that words acquire over time? And what precisely constitutes "action" when attributed to language? Is it the immediate impact of an utterance, or does it refer to the broader, perhaps long-term, consequences of linguistic engagement – the shaping of collective consciousness, the formation of social norms, or even the instigation of profound societal shifts? I anticipate the book will offer a robust theoretical framework, supported by compelling empirical evidence or insightful case studies. I’m particularly interested in how the author might address the performative aspects of language – how certain linguistic acts, when uttered under specific conditions, can bring about new realities (think of declarations, promises, or even certain legal pronouncements). Furthermore, I wonder if the book will delve into the ways in which language, through its symbolic operations, can subtly manipulate our perceptions and influence our choices, often without our conscious awareness. The title promises a journey into the very heart of human agency as mediated through language, and I am ready to embark on this fascinating intellectual adventure.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

啊啊啊啊什么鬼我2015年就mark读过这本书了。。。。可是它是这么的难啊真的不知道2015年的我学到了什么，只觉得burke这个人似乎听说过。。。重读burke和福柯让我对这个世界有了新的理解，是我以前没能领会的。他们都以极其抽象的方式阐述符号如何扩展人类认知的边界，我们社会的各种系统如何被符号定义和限制，非常的宏观的大结构。而一旦搞清楚了大结构，就能把很多新议题（比如假新闻的制造和传播，机器写作的authorship和ethics）轻松整理进这个框架，找到对应的理论去分析。就像修辞学老师说的，学修辞学就像学一门新的语言，一个新的看问题的方式。虽然还是会被虐哭，但是我开始能体会这门课的好处和enjoy这门课了。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

啊啊啊啊什么鬼我2015年就mark读过这本书了。。。。可是它是这么的难啊真的不知道2015年的我学到了什么，只觉得burke这个人似乎听说过。。。重读burke和福柯让我对这个世界有了新的理解，是我以前没能领会的。他们都以极其抽象的方式阐述符号如何扩展人类认知的边界，我们社会的各种系统如何被符号定义和限制，非常的宏观的大结构。而一旦搞清楚了大结构，就能把很多新议题（比如假新闻的制造和传播，机器写作的authorship和ethics）轻松整理进这个框架，找到对应的理论去分析。就像修辞学老师说的，学修辞学就像学一门新的语言，一个新的看问题的方式。虽然还是会被虐哭，但是我开始能体会这门课的好处和enjoy这门课了。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

啊啊啊啊什么鬼我2015年就mark读过这本书了。。。。可是它是这么的难啊真的不知道2015年的我学到了什么，只觉得burke这个人似乎听说过。。。重读burke和福柯让我对这个世界有了新的理解，是我以前没能领会的。他们都以极其抽象的方式阐述符号如何扩展人类认知的边界，我们社会的各种系统如何被符号定义和限制，非常的宏观的大结构。而一旦搞清楚了大结构，就能把很多新议题（比如假新闻的制造和传播，机器写作的authorship和ethics）轻松整理进这个框架，找到对应的理论去分析。就像修辞学老师说的，学修辞学就像学一门新的语言，一个新的看问题的方式。虽然还是会被虐哭，但是我开始能体会这门课的好处和enjoy这门课了。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

啊啊啊啊什么鬼我2015年就mark读过这本书了。。。。可是它是这么的难啊真的不知道2015年的我学到了什么，只觉得burke这个人似乎听说过。。。重读burke和福柯让我对这个世界有了新的理解，是我以前没能领会的。他们都以极其抽象的方式阐述符号如何扩展人类认知的边界，我们社会的各种系统如何被符号定义和限制，非常的宏观的大结构。而一旦搞清楚了大结构，就能把很多新议题（比如假新闻的制造和传播，机器写作的authorship和ethics）轻松整理进这个框架，找到对应的理论去分析。就像修辞学老师说的，学修辞学就像学一门新的语言，一个新的看问题的方式。虽然还是会被虐哭，但是我开始能体会这门课的好处和enjoy这门课了。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

啊啊啊啊什么鬼我2015年就mark读过这本书了。。。。可是它是这么的难啊真的不知道2015年的我学到了什么，只觉得burke这个人似乎听说过。。。重读burke和福柯让我对这个世界有了新的理解，是我以前没能领会的。他们都以极其抽象的方式阐述符号如何扩展人类认知的边界，我们社会的各种系统如何被符号定义和限制，非常的宏观的大结构。而一旦搞清楚了大结构，就能把很多新议题（比如假新闻的制造和传播，机器写作的authorship和ethics）轻松整理进这个框架，找到对应的理论去分析。就像修辞学老师说的，学修辞学就像学一门新的语言，一个新的看问题的方式。虽然还是会被虐哭，但是我开始能体会这门课的好处和enjoy这门课了。