This definitive edition of Anne Bronte's first novel incorporates her unpublished manuscript revisions, and incudes full textual apparatus and explanatory notes.
Anne Brontë (17 January 1820 – 28 May 1849) was a British novelist and poet, the youngest sibling of Charlotte and Emily Brontë. After initially publishing works under the pseudonyms Currer Bell, Ellis Bell, and Acton Bell they became famous as the Brontë sisters.
————真实的再现 作者是勃朗特三姐妹中最小的妹妹——安妮*勃朗特,一个听起来有些陌生的名字。这部小说是由安妮在当家庭教师时的日记整理而成,具有很强的自传风格。故事很简单,文字是我喜欢的浅显朴素风格,通篇没有什么戏剧冲突,几乎就是日常生活的再现。安妮将她...
评分 评分这是我第一本读完了的英文小说。 确实想给自己先鼓一下掌,又确实觉得太矫情。读完了它,实在不是因为它特别值得读,而是,我已经读了不下七八本英文小说,从来都是半途而废,或者“虎头蛇身”,这一本捧在手上,从翻开第一页开始,就对自己说,一定要读完它,无论如何,如果...
评分想买,但都没有找到这本书,是在一本《简 爱·呼啸山庄·阿格尼丝 格雷》的合本里面读完的这本不长的小说。善良的家庭教师阿格尼丝与牧师韦斯顿先生的爱情故事。怎么勃朗特三姐妹都爱写家庭教师呢。阿格尼丝两次家庭教师的经历都很悲剧……还好收获了满满的幸福!以及,不得不...
评分三姐妹的作品里,我好像并没有喜欢过简爱, 而相比最初读呼啸山庄时激情与狂热的感动, 到最后,还是阿格尼丝的安静淡定成为记忆里最美的风景。 所以我更喜欢安妮·勃郎特。 故事本身也许并不是最重要的, 难能可贵的是在众多的经典名著里, 真正打动人心的隽永文字是这样平凡...
不得不说,《Agnes Grey》这本书,在人物塑造上简直达到了炉火纯青的地步。尤其是书中对那些自私、虚荣、傲慢的贵族家庭的刻画,入木三分,令人印象深刻。那些孩子们的刁蛮任性,父母的纵容溺爱,以及在这种环境下滋生的各种小聪明和坏心眼,都被作者描绘得淋漓尽致,仿佛就在眼前。而艾格尼丝,就像是这污浊环境中的一抹亮色,她没有被同化,而是固守着自己的原则和善良,这种对比,让整本书的主题更加鲜明。
评分这本《Agnes Grey》读来,简直就是一股清流,让人在喧嚣的世界里找到了片刻的宁静。我尤其喜欢作者对主角艾格尼丝细腻的心理描写,那种内敛而坚韧的性格,在与周围环境的对比中,愈发显得可贵。她并非是那种惊天动地的女英雄,也没有轰轰烈烈的爱情,更多的是在平凡生活中,用自己的方式默默坚持着,这份坚持本身就足以打动人心。那种在寄人篱下的环境中,努力维护尊严,不卑不亢的态度,让我感同身受。
评分每次读《Agnes Grey》,都仿佛穿越回了那个年代,置身于英格兰乡间,感受着那种淳朴而又复杂的人情世故。作者的语言风格非常独特,她不煽情,不刻意渲染,但字里行间却流淌着一种淡淡的忧伤和对人性的思考。尤其是书中那些关于教育、关于阶级、关于女性命运的探讨,虽然年代久远,但放到现在依然有其深刻的意义。我非常欣赏这种不动声色的叙事方式,它反而更能引起读者的共鸣,让读者自己去体会其中的深意。
评分读完《Agnes Grey》,内心久久不能平静。这本书就像一位老朋友,静静地诉说着一个关于成长、关于坚韧、关于梦想的故事。作者并没有刻意制造戏剧冲突,而是将生活的本来面貌呈现出来,让读者在其中品味酸甜苦辣。我尤其喜欢书中对乡村生活的描绘,那种宁静、朴实,却又不乏世俗的烟火气,让人倍感亲切。而艾格尼丝,这个平凡却又不失光彩的女子,她的故事,也给了我很多启示,让我更加珍惜眼前的生活,更加坚定了自己的人生方向。
评分《Agnes Grey》这本书,对于我来说,更像是一次心灵的洗礼。它没有惊心动魄的情节,也没有跌宕起伏的命运,更多的是一种缓慢而深刻的渗透。艾格尼丝的经历,虽然看似平淡,但其中蕴含的力量却不容小觑。她面对不公时的隐忍,在逆境中的坚守,以及在绝望中的微光,都让我看到了人性中最坚韧的一面。这本书让我重新审视了“成功”的定义,原来,内心的宁静和坚守原则,本身就是一种伟大的胜利。
评分Anne的文笔流畅细腻,非常realistic, 表面平淡的故事也不乏动人之处。女主角是middle-class woman, 她的雇主属于upper middle class, 价值观却南辕北辙。
评分Anne Brontë wrote as if she were whining about her job and pining for her love, only more truthfully than one usually does, to her confidant. Her talent for social critics came into play, but her lack of introspection to her weakness (Agnes never bothered to make a mistake) and analysis on other characters' dilemmas diminish its intellectual worth.
评分Anne Brontë wrote as if she were whining about her job and pining for her love, only more truthfully than one usually does, to her confidant. Her talent for social critics came into play, but her lack of introspection to her weakness (Agnes never bothered to make a mistake) and analysis on other characters' dilemmas diminish its intellectual worth.
评分Anne Brontë wrote as if she were whining about her job and pining for her love, only more truthfully than one usually does, to her confidant. Her talent for social critics came into play, but her lack of introspection to her weakness (Agnes never bothered to make a mistake) and analysis on other characters' dilemmas diminish its intellectual worth.
评分Anne Brontë wrote as if she were whining about her job and pining for her love, only more truthfully than one usually does, to her confidant. Her talent for social critics came into play, but her lack of introspection to her weakness (Agnes never bothered to make a mistake) and analysis on other characters' dilemmas diminish its intellectual worth.