Japan's News Propaganda and Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870-1934

Japan's News Propaganda and Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870-1934 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Republic of Letters
作者:Tomoko Akami
出品人:
页数:346
译者:
出版时间:2012-8-31
价格:USD 49.00
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9789089791023
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 路透社
  • 英文
  • 宣传
  • 新闻
  • 历史
  • 日本新闻
  • 宣传
  • 路透社
  • 东北亚
  • 新闻帝国
  • 历史
  • 媒体
  • 国际关系
  • 19世纪
  • 20世纪初
想要找书就要到 图书目录大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Exactly twenty years after the first undersea cable was laid across the English Channel in 1851, the last leg of the north- and south- bound cable networks reached Japan via Shanghai, connecting all the continents, except for the Antarctic. This age of global telecommunications coincided with two moves by the major empires in the late nineteenth century: their aggressive colonization in Africa, Asia and the Pacific; and the expansion of the franchise at their metropolitan centres. Overseas news was conveyed more quickly, and affected more people's views of the world. As metropolitan states gradually expanded their franchise bases, these peoples' views (the public opinion) were becoming an important factor not only in domestic politics, but also in foreign policies. The states had to respond to these developments of technology and mass-based politics, realize the power of news, and come to see the need to develop policy and institutions to utilize news in foreign policy. As soon as global telecommunication networks were established, three major news agencies - British Reuters, French Havas, and German Wolff - created an interimperial news cartel system in 1870, and Northeast Asia came under Reuters' news empire. Using the notion of 'news propaganda', this book analyses how the Meiji state came into the inter-imperial news system, and how it became aware of the problem of Reuters'news empire in Northeast Asia. It also examines how the Japanese state began to develop the governmental institutions and a key operational agency, the national news agency, to utilize news propaganda in international politics, and how it challenged Reuters' news agency in the region with a help of American Associated Press. The book demonstrates the modern thinking of foreign policy elites, including high- to middle-ranking diplomats, military officers and news agency men. They were well attuned with global trends, technological development, and the rising significance 'international public opinion'. They responded not with isolationism from, but with greater engagement with the world public in the time of diplomatic crises and international conflicts. Their challenge to Reuters' news empire was not a structural challenge to the inter-imperial news system, but a quest for Japan's greater power in that system, and closely connected to the military expansion into China. CONTENTS Introduction Ch. 1: The Old Order: Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia Ch. 2: Japan's Early News Propaganda, 1870s-1900s Ch. 3: News Propaganda as a Foreign Policy; The Creation of Japan's Own News Propaganda Organizations, 1909-14 Ch. 4: The New Paradigm of International Politics Wartime News Propaganda and International Public Opinion, 1914-20 Ch. 5: Japan's Response to the New Paradigm, 1918-23 Ch. 6: Iwanaga's Vision for a National News Agency and the State's Response To Wireless, 1923-5 Ch. 7: The Formation of Rengō and its Challenge to the Monopoly of Reuters' News Empire in China, 1926-9 Ch. 8: News Propaganda and Mass-Based Politics during the Manchurian Crisis, 1931-3: the Beginning of the State's Coordination Ch. 9: The End of the Old Order of Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia and Rengō's Overseas Expansion, 1932-5 Ch. 10:1933-5: The Dawn of a New Era of News Propaganda Conclusion Archival Sources Bibliography About the Author Tomoko Akami was born in Tottori, Japan. She received an MA at Hiroshima, a second MA at Melbourne, and a PhD at the Australian National University. She now teaches and does research at the College of Asia and the Pacific at the Australian National University. Her publications include Internationalizing the Pacific (2002), and she has published on the idea of the Pacific Community in the 1920s, non-governmental organizations in Asia and the Pacific, comparative liberalism, and the nexus of the nation-state and empire.

作者简介

Tomoko Akami: Associate Professor (Reader): School of Culture, History & Language

She is now working on her latest ARC Discovery Project, 'Towards a globalized history of international relations: a case of Japan'. It amis to question the orthodox understanding of history of IR that has been based on Euro-American experiences, by problematizing colonialism, and examining the genealogies of the knowledge of the 'International' (such as IR, International Law, International Studies), mainly focusing on experts in Japan and their interactions with their counterparts across the regions. It builds on her recent works on history of international law, as well as her collaborative works with experts of IR and International Law.

She is one of the scholars who began to regard the League of Nations as a harbinger of global governing norms for the following UN era, but she focuses on an often-neglected region, Asia in this context. Her last ARC project on 'Empire and Global Health Governance', examined the League of Nations Health Organization's operations in Asia in the inter-war period. It built on her first book on the Institute of Pacific Relations (2002), which was an historical analysis of the role of non-governmental organizations and their experts in Asia and the Pacific in the inter-war period. Through these works, she has questioned the Westphalian model of international relations as an analytical base of inter-war international politics, as well as the national-international binary in examining internationalism. Instead, she has focused on the nexus of the nation-state and empire, explored the meaning of 'liberal empire' and inter-imperial/colonial cooperations in the formations of regional/international organizations and norms.

Her earlier ARC project also resulted in the two books on Japan's news agencies in its foreign policy, 1870–1945 (2012, 2014). Both see the the development of telecommunication technology and mass-based politics and the emergence of international public opinion as three major global factors which influenced modern states' foreign policy and their institution making. The first volume deals with Japan's challenge to Reuters' news empire in Northeast Asia in 1870–1934, and questions an assumption of a sudden change of Japan's foreign policy in the early 1930s in a broader context of the development of its information policy. The second volume examines the roles of the Board of Information (1941–45) and the national/imperial news agency (Domei) in the making of Japan's total war state/emire in 1934–45. It questions the often assumed nature of the political regime of Japan in this war period, by showing these two organizations' activities not in the area of domestic thought control, but in the area of news propaganda and intelligence gathering and assessment for foreign policy.

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

这本书的封面设计,那种陈旧泛黄的纸张质感,立刻将我拉回了那个信息流动缓慢,却又暗流涌动的时代背景之中。我原本以为这会是一部枯燥的史学著作,充满了晦涩的政治术语和密集的档案引用,但翻开第一章,那种对历史脉络的梳理方式,却展现出一种近乎侦探小说的悬疑感。作者似乎并不满足于简单地陈述“发生了什么”,而是更深入地挖掘“为什么会是这样被讲述出来”。他巧妙地运用了不同来源的材料,比如政府的官方电讯稿与私人的外交信函之间的微妙差异,这种对比揭示了新闻机构在构建叙事时所扮演的复杂角色。特别是关于明治维新后,日本如何利用新兴的通讯技术和媒体平台来塑造其在东亚的国际形象,这部分描绘得尤其细致入微。读者可以清晰地看到,媒体如何从一个纯粹的信息传递者,一步步演变为具有强大议程设置能力的政治工具。那种对信息控制的早期实践,与我们今天所处的数字信息时代,形成了某种令人不安的平行呼应,让人不禁深思,时代在变,但人性的弱点与权力的运作逻辑,是否从未改变。

评分

这本书读起来,最大的感受是“震撼”与“警醒”的交织。它并非一部轻松愉快的读物,更像是一面打磨得极亮的镜子,映照出权力如何利用“信息透明度”的假象来巩固其统治。尤其是在探讨1920年代到1930年代初,随着无线电技术的发展,宣传的效率和渗透力达到了新的高峰时,作者对细节的捕捉令人不寒而栗。他并没有过多地使用煽情的词汇,而是用冷静的笔触描绘出媒体如何被系统性地整合进国家机器的“软实力”建设中。这种“软化”的渗透方式,比赤裸裸的审查制度更加隐蔽也更难抵抗。我感觉自己仿佛置身于那个时代,亲手触摸着那些发出的电报纸,试图分辨哪一句是真实的记录,哪一句是精心设计的“期望”。这种对阅读者的智力挑战,正是本书引人入胜之处。

评分

从装帧的质感延伸到内容深度,这本书成功地在学术的严谨性和大众的可读性之间找到了一个完美的平衡点。作者的行文风格变化多端,有时如同严密的法律文件般字斟句酌,分析国际条约对新闻自由的限制;有时又变得极其生动,描绘了早期驻外记者为了抢到独家消息而进行的惊险操作。这种节奏的切换,使得长篇的论述不会让人感到疲惫。我尤其欣赏其在收尾部分对“遗产”的探讨,即1870至1934年间形成的这一套信息-权力运作模式,是如何潜移默化地影响了战后乃至当代东北亚乃至全球的新闻生态。它提醒我们,今天我们所接受的国际新闻,其底层逻辑和结构,可能在一百多年前的蒸汽和电报时代就已经被奠定了。这是一部需要被反复阅读,并值得被所有关注历史与媒体关系的人士认真对待的杰作。

评分

对于研究国际传播史或者东亚近代史的同行而言,这本书无疑是一份里程碑式的参考资料。其最大的价值在于,它成功地将宏观的历史事件——如甲午战争、日俄战争的宣传战线——与微观的电报撰写规范和新闻社的内部决策流程结合起来进行考察。我个人最感兴趣的是关于“视角偏差”的章节,作者展示了同一场军事冲突,在不同的新闻机构的笔下,是如何被构建出截然相反的道德基调和战略解读的。这不仅仅是关于事实的歪曲,更是关于“何种事实被认为值得报道”的选择权力的体现。那种对于早期电报编码、信息垄断如何影响外交决策的详细描述,让我对那个时代的信息战有了全新的、更为立体的认知。它迫使我们跳出传统的民族国家叙事框架,转而从信息流动的物理和商业结构上去审视历史的驱动力,这是一种极其高明的史学重构。

评分

这本书的叙事节奏把握得极其精准,它没有急于抛出爆炸性的结论,而是采取了一种渐进式的论证结构,如同剥洋葱一般,一层层揭开东北亚地缘政治风云下的信息迷雾。我特别欣赏作者对“路透社”这个跨国信息巨头的处理方式。他们并非被描绘成一个全然邪恶的操纵者,而是一个在利益、效率与地缘政治压力之间不断进行微妙平衡的商业实体。这种中立而又深刻的剖析,远比简单的指责更为有力。在阅读过程中,我反复被引导去思考:当一条新闻从东京发出,经过伦敦的编辑室,再转译回亚洲的其他角落时,它经过了多少次意义的“润色”与“过滤”?这种跨文化的传播链条,本身就是一部无声的权力史。全书的论据扎实得令人信服,每一个观点都有详尽的史料支撑,但语言风格却异常流畅,绝无一般学术专著的沉闷感,更像是一位学识渊博的智者在与你进行一场深刻的下午茶对话,娓娓道来历史的真相与表象之间的张力。

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有