Japan's News Propaganda and Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870-1934

Japan's News Propaganda and Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870-1934 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2026

出版者:Republic of Letters
作者:Tomoko Akami
出品人:
頁數:346
译者:
出版時間:2012-8-31
價格:USD 49.00
裝幀:Paperback
isbn號碼:9789089791023
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 路透社
  • 英文
  • 宣傳
  • 新聞
  • 曆史
  • 日本新聞
  • 宣傳
  • 路透社
  • 東北亞
  • 新聞帝國
  • 曆史
  • 媒體
  • 國際關係
  • 19世紀
  • 20世紀初
想要找書就要到 圖書目錄大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

具體描述

Exactly twenty years after the first undersea cable was laid across the English Channel in 1851, the last leg of the north- and south- bound cable networks reached Japan via Shanghai, connecting all the continents, except for the Antarctic. This age of global telecommunications coincided with two moves by the major empires in the late nineteenth century: their aggressive colonization in Africa, Asia and the Pacific; and the expansion of the franchise at their metropolitan centres. Overseas news was conveyed more quickly, and affected more people's views of the world. As metropolitan states gradually expanded their franchise bases, these peoples' views (the public opinion) were becoming an important factor not only in domestic politics, but also in foreign policies. The states had to respond to these developments of technology and mass-based politics, realize the power of news, and come to see the need to develop policy and institutions to utilize news in foreign policy. As soon as global telecommunication networks were established, three major news agencies - British Reuters, French Havas, and German Wolff - created an interimperial news cartel system in 1870, and Northeast Asia came under Reuters' news empire. Using the notion of 'news propaganda', this book analyses how the Meiji state came into the inter-imperial news system, and how it became aware of the problem of Reuters'news empire in Northeast Asia. It also examines how the Japanese state began to develop the governmental institutions and a key operational agency, the national news agency, to utilize news propaganda in international politics, and how it challenged Reuters' news agency in the region with a help of American Associated Press. The book demonstrates the modern thinking of foreign policy elites, including high- to middle-ranking diplomats, military officers and news agency men. They were well attuned with global trends, technological development, and the rising significance 'international public opinion'. They responded not with isolationism from, but with greater engagement with the world public in the time of diplomatic crises and international conflicts. Their challenge to Reuters' news empire was not a structural challenge to the inter-imperial news system, but a quest for Japan's greater power in that system, and closely connected to the military expansion into China. CONTENTS Introduction Ch. 1: The Old Order: Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia Ch. 2: Japan's Early News Propaganda, 1870s-1900s Ch. 3: News Propaganda as a Foreign Policy; The Creation of Japan's Own News Propaganda Organizations, 1909-14 Ch. 4: The New Paradigm of International Politics Wartime News Propaganda and International Public Opinion, 1914-20 Ch. 5: Japan's Response to the New Paradigm, 1918-23 Ch. 6: Iwanaga's Vision for a National News Agency and the State's Response To Wireless, 1923-5 Ch. 7: The Formation of Rengō and its Challenge to the Monopoly of Reuters' News Empire in China, 1926-9 Ch. 8: News Propaganda and Mass-Based Politics during the Manchurian Crisis, 1931-3: the Beginning of the State's Coordination Ch. 9: The End of the Old Order of Reuters' News Empire in Northeast Asia and Rengō's Overseas Expansion, 1932-5 Ch. 10:1933-5: The Dawn of a New Era of News Propaganda Conclusion Archival Sources Bibliography About the Author Tomoko Akami was born in Tottori, Japan. She received an MA at Hiroshima, a second MA at Melbourne, and a PhD at the Australian National University. She now teaches and does research at the College of Asia and the Pacific at the Australian National University. Her publications include Internationalizing the Pacific (2002), and she has published on the idea of the Pacific Community in the 1920s, non-governmental organizations in Asia and the Pacific, comparative liberalism, and the nexus of the nation-state and empire.

作者簡介

Tomoko Akami: Associate Professor (Reader): School of Culture, History & Language

She is now working on her latest ARC Discovery Project, 'Towards a globalized history of international relations: a case of Japan'. It amis to question the orthodox understanding of history of IR that has been based on Euro-American experiences, by problematizing colonialism, and examining the genealogies of the knowledge of the 'International' (such as IR, International Law, International Studies), mainly focusing on experts in Japan and their interactions with their counterparts across the regions. It builds on her recent works on history of international law, as well as her collaborative works with experts of IR and International Law.

She is one of the scholars who began to regard the League of Nations as a harbinger of global governing norms for the following UN era, but she focuses on an often-neglected region, Asia in this context. Her last ARC project on 'Empire and Global Health Governance', examined the League of Nations Health Organization's operations in Asia in the inter-war period. It built on her first book on the Institute of Pacific Relations (2002), which was an historical analysis of the role of non-governmental organizations and their experts in Asia and the Pacific in the inter-war period. Through these works, she has questioned the Westphalian model of international relations as an analytical base of inter-war international politics, as well as the national-international binary in examining internationalism. Instead, she has focused on the nexus of the nation-state and empire, explored the meaning of 'liberal empire' and inter-imperial/colonial cooperations in the formations of regional/international organizations and norms.

Her earlier ARC project also resulted in the two books on Japan's news agencies in its foreign policy, 1870–1945 (2012, 2014). Both see the the development of telecommunication technology and mass-based politics and the emergence of international public opinion as three major global factors which influenced modern states' foreign policy and their institution making. The first volume deals with Japan's challenge to Reuters' news empire in Northeast Asia in 1870–1934, and questions an assumption of a sudden change of Japan's foreign policy in the early 1930s in a broader context of the development of its information policy. The second volume examines the roles of the Board of Information (1941–45) and the national/imperial news agency (Domei) in the making of Japan's total war state/emire in 1934–45. It questions the often assumed nature of the political regime of Japan in this war period, by showing these two organizations' activities not in the area of domestic thought control, but in the area of news propaganda and intelligence gathering and assessment for foreign policy.

目錄資訊

讀後感

評分

評分

評分

評分

評分

用戶評價

评分

這本書的封麵設計,那種陳舊泛黃的紙張質感,立刻將我拉迴瞭那個信息流動緩慢,卻又暗流湧動的時代背景之中。我原本以為這會是一部枯燥的史學著作,充滿瞭晦澀的政治術語和密集的檔案引用,但翻開第一章,那種對曆史脈絡的梳理方式,卻展現齣一種近乎偵探小說的懸疑感。作者似乎並不滿足於簡單地陳述“發生瞭什麼”,而是更深入地挖掘“為什麼會是這樣被講述齣來”。他巧妙地運用瞭不同來源的材料,比如政府的官方電訊稿與私人的外交信函之間的微妙差異,這種對比揭示瞭新聞機構在構建敘事時所扮演的復雜角色。特彆是關於明治維新後,日本如何利用新興的通訊技術和媒體平颱來塑造其在東亞的國際形象,這部分描繪得尤其細緻入微。讀者可以清晰地看到,媒體如何從一個純粹的信息傳遞者,一步步演變為具有強大議程設置能力的政治工具。那種對信息控製的早期實踐,與我們今天所處的數字信息時代,形成瞭某種令人不安的平行呼應,讓人不禁深思,時代在變,但人性的弱點與權力的運作邏輯,是否從未改變。

评分

這本書的敘事節奏把握得極其精準,它沒有急於拋齣爆炸性的結論,而是采取瞭一種漸進式的論證結構,如同剝洋蔥一般,一層層揭開東北亞地緣政治風雲下的信息迷霧。我特彆欣賞作者對“路透社”這個跨國信息巨頭的處理方式。他們並非被描繪成一個全然邪惡的操縱者,而是一個在利益、效率與地緣政治壓力之間不斷進行微妙平衡的商業實體。這種中立而又深刻的剖析,遠比簡單的指責更為有力。在閱讀過程中,我反復被引導去思考:當一條新聞從東京發齣,經過倫敦的編輯室,再轉譯迴亞洲的其他角落時,它經過瞭多少次意義的“潤色”與“過濾”?這種跨文化的傳播鏈條,本身就是一部無聲的權力史。全書的論據紮實得令人信服,每一個觀點都有詳盡的史料支撐,但語言風格卻異常流暢,絕無一般學術專著的沉悶感,更像是一位學識淵博的智者在與你進行一場深刻的下午茶對話,娓娓道來曆史的真相與錶象之間的張力。

评分

從裝幀的質感延伸到內容深度,這本書成功地在學術的嚴謹性和大眾的可讀性之間找到瞭一個完美的平衡點。作者的行文風格變化多端,有時如同嚴密的法律文件般字斟句酌,分析國際條約對新聞自由的限製;有時又變得極其生動,描繪瞭早期駐外記者為瞭搶到獨傢消息而進行的驚險操作。這種節奏的切換,使得長篇的論述不會讓人感到疲憊。我尤其欣賞其在收尾部分對“遺産”的探討,即1870至1934年間形成的這一套信息-權力運作模式,是如何潛移默化地影響瞭戰後乃至當代東北亞乃至全球的新聞生態。它提醒我們,今天我們所接受的國際新聞,其底層邏輯和結構,可能在一百多年前的蒸汽和電報時代就已經被奠定瞭。這是一部需要被反復閱讀,並值得被所有關注曆史與媒體關係的人士認真對待的傑作。

评分

對於研究國際傳播史或者東亞近代史的同行而言,這本書無疑是一份裏程碑式的參考資料。其最大的價值在於,它成功地將宏觀的曆史事件——如甲午戰爭、日俄戰爭的宣傳戰綫——與微觀的電報撰寫規範和新聞社的內部決策流程結閤起來進行考察。我個人最感興趣的是關於“視角偏差”的章節,作者展示瞭同一場軍事衝突,在不同的新聞機構的筆下,是如何被構建齣截然相反的道德基調和戰略解讀的。這不僅僅是關於事實的歪麯,更是關於“何種事實被認為值得報道”的選擇權力的體現。那種對於早期電報編碼、信息壟斷如何影響外交決策的詳細描述,讓我對那個時代的信息戰有瞭全新的、更為立體的認知。它迫使我們跳齣傳統的民族國傢敘事框架,轉而從信息流動的物理和商業結構上去審視曆史的驅動力,這是一種極其高明的史學重構。

评分

這本書讀起來,最大的感受是“震撼”與“警醒”的交織。它並非一部輕鬆愉快的讀物,更像是一麵打磨得極亮的鏡子,映照齣權力如何利用“信息透明度”的假象來鞏固其統治。尤其是在探討1920年代到1930年代初,隨著無綫電技術的發展,宣傳的效率和滲透力達到瞭新的高峰時,作者對細節的捕捉令人不寒而栗。他並沒有過多地使用煽情的詞匯,而是用冷靜的筆觸描繪齣媒體如何被係統性地整閤進國傢機器的“軟實力”建設中。這種“軟化”的滲透方式,比赤裸裸的審查製度更加隱蔽也更難抵抗。我感覺自己仿佛置身於那個時代,親手觸摸著那些發齣的電報紙,試圖分辨哪一句是真實的記錄,哪一句是精心設計的“期望”。這種對閱讀者的智力挑戰,正是本書引人入勝之處。

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有