Making Democracy Work pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Robert D. Putnam is the Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy at Harvard, where he teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. Professor Putnam is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a Fellow of the British Academy, and past president of the American Political Science Association. In 2006, Putnam received the Skytte Prize, one of the world's highest accolades for a political scientist. Raised in a small town in the Midwest and educated at Swarthmore, Oxford, and Yale, he has served as Dean of the Kennedy School of Government.
He has written fourteen books, translated into twenty languages, including the best-selling Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, and more recently Better Together: Restoring the American Community, a study of promising new forms of social connectedness. His previous book, Making Democracy Work, was praised by the Economist as "a great work of social science, worthy to rank alongside de Tocqueville, Pareto and Weber." Both Making Democracy Work and Bowling Alone are among the most cited publications in the social sciences worldwide in the last half century.
- 政治學
- democracy
- 社會學
- 政治
- politics
- CivilSociety
- 比較政治
- social-capital
Why do some democratic governments succeed and others fail? In a book that has received attention from policymakers and civic activists in America and around the world, Robert Putnam and his collaborators offer empirical evidence for the importance of "civic community" in developing successful institutions. Their focus is on a unique experiment begun in 1970 when Italy created new governments for each of its regions. After spending two decades analyzing the efficacy of these governments in such fields as agriculture, housing, and health services, they reveal patterns of associationism, trust, and cooperation that facilitate good governance and economic prosperity.
具體描述
讀後感
从政治制度的变革入手，考察意大利各地区制度绩效，发现南北差异，导入公民性、公民性研究，追溯中世纪历史，城市共和国遗产作用远大于其他因素。首倡政治发展中的社会资本研究。规范与实证研究功力相当。
評分似乎无论是不是涉及中国，democracy这个词都会成为最大的标题党，什么Capitalism Without Democracy, Accountability Without Democracy，不一而足。要是认真，你就输了——真去翻书，才会知道democracy基本属于躺着也中枪的级别，他们讨论的基本不干民主什么事儿。同样地，带...
評分从政治制度的变革入手，考察意大利各地区制度绩效，发现南北差异，导入公民性、公民性研究，追溯中世纪历史，城市共和国遗产作用远大于其他因素。首倡政治发展中的社会资本研究。规范与实证研究功力相当。
評分 評分用戶評價
去年被要求看的書（太長+數據太多=不看）今年刷瞭幾個書評瞭事。關於社會資本不同導緻同樣下放權利到南北意大利不同地方政府，皿煮運轉的不同。好像放到我國做實驗也會是差不多的結果嘛，把南北對調一下，我國南北經濟意識各方麵都跟意大利南北是反的。
评分精緻，但讀後沒有太大的衝擊力。
评分從視野格局和經驗材料上講堪稱完美。唯一有一個不太對勁之處是微觀的機製和宏觀的相關之間的聯係似乎論證得不夠強。微觀的社會資本和微觀的閤作之間的因果機製很清楚，宏觀的地區civic tradition和地區治理效率之間的相關也很清楚，但是小的association的作用如何傳導到宏觀的民主化呢？public-spiritedness&egalitarian value spawned by networks of civic engagement大概是傳導帶，可是具體怎麼傳導的沒有詳細說明。不過當然開創性作品也不能把事情都做完瞭……
评分從視野格局和經驗材料上講堪稱完美。唯一有一個不太對勁之處是微觀的機製和宏觀的相關之間的聯係似乎論證得不夠強。微觀的社會資本和微觀的閤作之間的因果機製很清楚，宏觀的地區civic tradition和地區治理效率之間的相關也很清楚，但是小的association的作用如何傳導到宏觀的民主化呢？public-spiritedness&egalitarian value spawned by networks of civic engagement大概是傳導帶，可是具體怎麼傳導的沒有詳細說明。不過當然開創性作品也不能把事情都做完瞭……
评分有一陣導師相當迷戀，學部生的小太妹和院生逢人就推薦。這兩年突然就不知道為何就突然從書單上取消瞭。。。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有