In this volume, Albert Hirschman reconstructs the intellectual climate of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to illuminate the intricate ideological transformation that occurred, wherein the pursuit of material interests - so long condemned as the deadly sin of avarice - was assigned the role of containing the unruly and destructive passions of man. Hirschman here offers a new interpretation for the rise of capitalism, one that emphasizes the continuities between old and new, in contrast to the assumption of a sharp break that is a common feature of both Marxian and Weberian thinking. Among the insights presented here is the ironical finding that capitalism was originally supposed to accomplish exactly what was soon denounced as its worst feature: the repression of the passions in favor of the 'harmless,' if one-dimensional, interests of commercial life. To portray this lengthy ideological change as an endogenous process, Hirschman draws on the writings of a large number of thinkers, including Montesquieu, Sir James Steuart, and Adam Smith.
阿尔伯特•赫希曼(Albert Otto Hirschman,1915—2012),1915年生于德国柏林。1941年移民美国,先后在加州大学伯克利分校、耶鲁大学、哥伦比亚大学和哈佛大学从事研究与教学工作,1974年加入普林斯顿高等研究院直至去世。其学术研究涉及经济学、政治学和思想史等多个领域,著有《经济发展的策略》(1958)、《退出、呼吁与忠诚:对企业、组织和国家衰退的回应》(1970)、《转变参与:私人利益与公共行动的新描述》(1982)、《反动的修辞:保守主义的三个命题》(1991)《自我颠覆的倾向》(1995)等。
what are the intended consequences of the rise of capitalism? how did they,theoretically and practically,fail to realize? what is the significance of exposing this intellectual episode?
评分what are the intended consequences of the rise of capitalism? how did they,theoretically and practically,fail to realize? what is the significance of exposing this intellectual episode?
评分首先必须指出,本书中关键概念的翻译为阅读带了很大的困扰。虽然译者在序言中特别写明了他将“passion”译作“欲望”的理由,但这一翻译其实很不妥当。在中文语境下,“激情”已经是一个相当中性的词汇,既有“激情犯罪”“激情杀人”,也有“创作激情”“艺术激情”等,并不存...
评分我在追溯现代社会中“激情的终结”的来龙去脉时,再次遭遇了赫希曼(Albert Hirschman)的《激情与利益:资本主义大获全胜之前的政治争论》(The Passions and the Interests:PoliticalArguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph)一书。以前虽然浏览过此书的中译本,但没有...
评分最近泡在这个主题的书籍中,试图能够理解现代化的过程。偶然看到这本薄薄的小册子。核心观点很简单:人的欲望是破坏性的力量,资本主义时代则以个人利益这个比较不坏的东西,来取代/化解欲望这个比较坏的东西。两害相权,取其轻。 作者引经据典,分析了资本主义初期的诸多思想...
引人入胜
评分行文简洁,说理透彻,我辈楷模!
评分这种有点Genealogy的方式挺有意思,不知道受没受尼采影响。
评分通透的小书,上完夜班来看居然也不觉得倦。
评分非常出色的经济思想史写作,最大的亮点就是把interest放回到passion-taming/statecraft的脉络中去,很大程度上把资本主义的崛起和古典语境中的人性塑造重新联系起来。换句话说,如果韦伯的新教伦理是在基督教的线索下发现近代欧洲,那么Hirschman就是以希腊人的视角重新讲述了这个故事。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有