Partha Chatterjee is director of the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, and visiting professor of anthropology at Columbia University.
Often dismissed as the rumblings of "the street," popular politics is where political modernity is being formed today, according to Partha Chatterjee. The rise of mass politics all over the world in the twentieth century led to the development of new techniques of governing population groups. On the one hand, the idea of popular sovereignty has gained wide acceptance. On the other hand, the proliferation of security and welfare technologies has created modern governmental bodies that administer populations, but do not provide citizens with an arena for democratic deliberation. Under these conditions, democracy is no longer government of, by, and for the people. Rather, it has become a world of power whose startling dimensions and unwritten rules of engagement Chatterjee provocatively lays bare. This book argues that the rise of ethnic or identity politics-particularly in the postcolonial world-is a consequence of new techniques of governmental administration. Using contemporary examples from India, the book examines the different forms taken by the politics of the governed.
Many of these operate outside of the traditionally defined arena of civil society and the formal legal institutions of the state. This book considers the global conditions within which such local forms of popular politics have appeared and shows us how both community and global society have been transformed. Chatterjee's analysis explores the strategic as well as the ethical dimensions of the new democratic politics of rights, claims, and entitlements of population groups and permits a new understanding of the dynamics of world politics both before and after the events of September 11, 2001. The Politics of the Governed consists of three essays, originally given as the Leonard Hastings Schoff Lectures at Columbia University in November 2001, and four additional essays that complement and extend the analyses presented there. By combining these essays between the covers of a single volume, Chatterjee has given us a major and urgent work that provides a full perspective on the possibilities and limits of democracy in the postcolonial world.
查特吉被称为印度底层研究的干将,最近比较热门,一个原因是不久前他在上海主张中印例外论,其实07年访问中国期间他就说过这个观点。查特吉做过大量印度和孟加拉的民族志研究(关于古吉拉特邦民族冲突,他和纳斯鲍姆在《内部的冲突:民主、宗教暴力和印度的未来》中的观点非常...
評分有教授曾語重心長道,理論並非讓文章變得更漂亮、更有說服力的哲學修辭,而是啟發我們思考當下的工具。如果社會是個受百病糾纏的身體,學者是醫生,理論便是他們用來觀察和解剖的儀器了。然而身體與病毒一樣,千變萬化無從捉摸,要精確的診斷,便得用最貼身的器具和方法。把病...
評分Partha Chatterjee这本书的主要论点大致可以用这一句话来概括:“除了大众主权的抽象许诺之外,大部分世界的人民正在发明新的方式,根据这种新的方式,他们可以选择他们应该如何被治理。……人民学会,同时也迫使他们的统治者学会,他们愿意怎样被统治。……这是对民主的一个好...
評分政治社会的概念,确实可以用来嘲讽那些傻逼中国公知的《公民社会进行曲》,但转念一想,类似加尔各答“铁道村1号”这种组织,恐怕在我天朝早被威武城管大军铲灭荡平了吧。北京原来还有浙江村、河南村、新疆村呢,现在还真是地球村呀……
讀後兩個最好奇的問題: 1). 政治社會和身份政治的邏輯完全重疊嗎?如果不是,他們的張力在哪裏? 2). 在中國語境下,一方麵,政治社會和公民社會的空間都非常有限,因而很難說存在Chatterjee強調的那種顯著的精英公民和底層庶民的二分和矛盾,尤其在中國推崇公民意識的城市中産自由派/知識精英其實非常樂見這種庶民抗爭,當然,文革記憶還是在兩者間劃瞭一條和Chatterjee所述有點類似的綫,但中國這種精英對“大鳴大放”和民粹的恐懼和不理解還是帶著對國傢運動式政治的擔憂,不是印度那種對“流氓和窮鬼”的反感;另一方麵,新儒傢、毛主義和“小康”話語對國傢與底層關係的道德塑造,以及這種話語對庶民的開放,至少比福柯的治理術、及Chatterjee所言的人口學工具性多齣瞭一份人文和情感上的閤法性
评分人口政治
评分和chatterjee彆的書差不多,如果跳著看會什麼也看不齣來
评分最近因為要寫東西又翻瞭翻。拎齣PS和CS這一組對立的概念還是很聰明的做法。於學理頗有不通之處,卻能說明一些問題。但印度的PS仍然是非常特殊的,它是印度較為穩定的民主製度、封閉的精英階層、迅速的經濟發展,和不足夠的國傢能力交閤的産物,也隻有在那樣的環境下纔會齣現明顯的PS和CS的衝突。所以這個並不是“大部分世界的大眾政治”。此外CS也算個理想型吧。書裏說的很多PS的特點,比如paralegal的安排,沒有絕對的權利隻有基於成本的算計和討價還價,這在CS裏也是常態啊。
评分讀後兩個最好奇的問題: 1). 政治社會和身份政治的邏輯完全重疊嗎?如果不是,他們的張力在哪裏? 2). 在中國語境下,一方麵,政治社會和公民社會的空間都非常有限,因而很難說存在Chatterjee強調的那種顯著的精英公民和底層庶民的二分和矛盾,尤其在中國推崇公民意識的城市中産自由派/知識精英其實非常樂見這種庶民抗爭,當然,文革記憶還是在兩者間劃瞭一條和Chatterjee所述有點類似的綫,但中國這種精英對“大鳴大放”和民粹的恐懼和不理解還是帶著對國傢運動式政治的擔憂,不是印度那種對“流氓和窮鬼”的反感;另一方麵,新儒傢、毛主義和“小康”話語對國傢與底層關係的道德塑造,以及這種話語對庶民的開放,至少比福柯的治理術、及Chatterjee所言的人口學工具性多齣瞭一份人文和情感上的閤法性
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有