Conventional wisdom has it that the sciences, properly pursued, constitute a pure, value-free method of obtaining knowledge about the natural world. In light of the social and normative dimensions of many scientific debates, Helen Longino finds that general accounts of scientific methodology cannot support this common belief. Focusing on the notion of evidence, the author argues that a methodology powerful enough to account for theories of any scope and depth is incapable of ruling out the influence of social and cultural values in the very structuring of knowledge. The objectivity of scientific inquiry can nevertheless be maintained, she proposes, by understanding scientific inquiry as a social rather than an individual process.Seeking to open a dialogue between methodologists and social critics of the sciences, Longino develops this concept of "contextual empiricism" in an analysis of research programs that have drawn criticism from feminists. Examining theories of human evolution and of prenatal hormonal determination of "gender-role" behavior, of sex differences in cognition, and of sexual orientation, the author shows how assumptions laden with social values affect the description, presentation, and interpretation of data. In particular, Longino argues that research on the hormonal basis of "sex-differentiated behavior" involves assumptions not only about gender relations but also about human action and agency. She concludes with a discussion of the relation between science, values, and ideology, based on the work of Habermas, Foucault, Keller, and Haraway.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
啥也不說瞭 Kuhn偉大！
评分I still think that science, if not is, at least aims at being objective, despite the undeniable existence of short-term subjective elements during the period of Kuhnian normal science (and possibly that of revolutionary science too). I'd still like to hold back on the claim about so-called feminist science.
评分I still think that science, if not is, at least aims at being objective, despite the undeniable existence of short-term subjective elements during the period of Kuhnian normal science (and possibly that of revolutionary science too). I'd still like to hold back on the claim about so-called feminist science.
评分I still think that science, if not is, at least aims at being objective, despite the undeniable existence of short-term subjective elements during the period of Kuhnian normal science (and possibly that of revolutionary science too). I'd still like to hold back on the claim about so-called feminist science.
评分I still think that science, if not is, at least aims at being objective, despite the undeniable existence of short-term subjective elements during the period of Kuhnian normal science (and possibly that of revolutionary science too). I'd still like to hold back on the claim about so-called feminist science.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有