The usefulness and political implications of Area Studies programs are currently debated within the Academy and the Administration, where they are often treated as one homogenous and stagnant domain of scholarship. The essays in this volume document the various fields' distinctive character and internal heterogeneity as well as the dynamism resulting from their evolving engagements with funders, US and international politics, and domestic constituencies. The authors were chosen for their long-standing interest in the intellectual evolution of their fields. They describe the origins and histories of US-based Area Studies programs, highlighting their complex, generative, and sometimes contentious relationships with the social science and humanities disciplines and their diverse contributions to the regions of the world with which they are concerned.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Andrew Walder wrote the China part...
评分Andrew Walder wrote the China part...
评分讲美国的社会科学和区域研究的关系。Mitchell那篇讲中东的还不错。中国研究在美国其实一直都挺热火，但除了让美国人都知道了「关系」这么一个拼音词儿之外，大家还干了点啥呢？
评分看了下魏昂德论The Transformation of Contemporary China Studies的一篇
评分讲美国的社会科学和区域研究的关系。Mitchell那篇讲中东的还不错。中国研究在美国其实一直都挺热火，但除了让美国人都知道了「关系」这么一个拼音词儿之外，大家还干了点啥呢？
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有