The usefulness and political implications of Area Studies programs are currently debated within the Academy and the Administration, where they are often treated as one homogenous and stagnant domain of scholarship. The essays in this volume document the various fields' distinctive character and internal heterogeneity as well as the dynamism resulting from their evolving engagements with funders, US and international politics, and domestic constituencies. The authors were chosen for their long-standing interest in the intellectual evolution of their fields. They describe the origins and histories of US-based Area Studies programs, highlighting their complex, generative, and sometimes contentious relationships with the social science and humanities disciplines and their diverse contributions to the regions of the world with which they are concerned.
評分
評分
評分
評分
Andrew Walder wrote the China part...
评分Andrew Walder wrote the China part...
评分講美國的社會科學和區域研究的關係。Mitchell那篇講中東的還不錯。中國研究在美國其實一直都挺熱火,但除瞭讓美國人都知道瞭「關係」這麼一個拼音詞兒之外,大傢還乾瞭點啥呢?
评分講美國的社會科學和區域研究的關係。Mitchell那篇講中東的還不錯。中國研究在美國其實一直都挺熱火,但除瞭讓美國人都知道瞭「關係」這麼一個拼音詞兒之外,大傢還乾瞭點啥呢?
评分講美國的社會科學和區域研究的關係。Mitchell那篇講中東的還不錯。中國研究在美國其實一直都挺熱火,但除瞭讓美國人都知道瞭「關係」這麼一個拼音詞兒之外,大傢還乾瞭點啥呢?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有