L.J. Newby, DPhil (1989), is Lecturer in Chinese at the University of Oxford
Drawing primarily on Qing archival sources, this study charts the changes in Qing policy that characterized the empire’s relations with the Central Asian khanate of Khoqand, from the Qianlong era to the mid-19th century. It explores how the development of Khoqand as a regional power and its involvement with the khoja-cause impacted on Qing policy towards Xinjiang (Eastern Turkestan) and the consolidation of the north-western frontier. Focussing on the Altishahr region, it illustrates how, a notion of border defined by geography, politics and military logistics began to replace the earlier open and more fluid notion of frontier in Qing political thinking. It suggests that these developments presaged a transition from empire to nation-state long before the upheavals of the late 19th century.
评分
评分
评分
评分
清与浩罕关系史(1760-1860)的经典著作,总页数不太长,但正文、注释的信息量都非常大,基本上同佐口透、傅礼初的论著一样,都是相关领域必须参考的成果,以致于我发现Scott C. Levi去年出版的全球史专著《浩罕的兴衰》,竟然被迫要大量引用、辨析Newby的观点。#出书要趁早
评分清与浩罕关系史(1760-1860)的经典著作,总页数不太长,但正文、注释的信息量都非常大,基本上同佐口透、傅礼初的论著一样,都是相关领域必须参考的成果,以致于我发现Scott C. Levi去年出版的全球史专著《浩罕的兴衰》,竟然被迫要大量引用、辨析Newby的观点。#出书要趁早
评分清与浩罕关系史(1760-1860)的经典著作,总页数不太长,但正文、注释的信息量都非常大,基本上同佐口透、傅礼初的论著一样,都是相关领域必须参考的成果,以致于我发现Scott C. Levi去年出版的全球史专著《浩罕的兴衰》,竟然被迫要大量引用、辨析Newby的观点。#出书要趁早
评分清与浩罕关系史(1760-1860)的经典著作,总页数不太长,但正文、注释的信息量都非常大,基本上同佐口透、傅礼初的论著一样,都是相关领域必须参考的成果,以致于我发现Scott C. Levi去年出版的全球史专著《浩罕的兴衰》,竟然被迫要大量引用、辨析Newby的观点。#出书要趁早
评分清与浩罕关系史(1760-1860)的经典著作,总页数不太长,但正文、注释的信息量都非常大,基本上同佐口透、傅礼初的论著一样,都是相关领域必须参考的成果,以致于我发现Scott C. Levi去年出版的全球史专著《浩罕的兴衰》,竟然被迫要大量引用、辨析Newby的观点。#出书要趁早
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有