Breaking with the Past? pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Aurel Croissant is professor of political science at Heidelberg University, Germany, and can be reached at aurel.croissant@urz.uni-heidelberg.de. David Kuehn (kuehn@uni-heidelberg.de) and Philip Lorenz (voelkel@uni-heidelberg.de) are research and teaching fellows at the Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University.

出版者:East-West Center

作者:Aurel Croissant

出品人:

頁數:84

译者:

出版時間:2012-5-9

價格:USD 10.00

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780866382267

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

文武關係
政治學
安全研究
軍政關係

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到圖書目錄大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

In recent decades, several East Asian nations have undergone democratic transitions accompanied by changes in the balance of power between civilian elites and military leaders. These developments have not followed a single pattern: In Thailand, failure to institutionalize civilian control has contributed to the breakdown of democracy; civil-military relations and democracy in the Philippines are in prolonged crisis; and civilian control in Indonesia is yet to be institutionalized. At the same time, South Korea and Taiwan have established civilian supremacy and made great advances in consolidating democracy. These differences can be explained by the interplay of structural environment and civilian political entrepreneurship. In Taiwan, Korea, and Indonesia, strategic action, prioritization, and careful timing helped civilians make the best of their structural opportunities to overcome legacies of military involvement in politics. In Thailand, civilians overestimated their ability to control the military and provoked military intervention. In the Philippines, civilian governments forged a symbiotic relationship with military elites that allowed civilians to survive in office but also protected the military's institutional interests. These differences in the development of civil-military relations had serious repercussions on national security, political stability, and democratic consolidation, helping to explain why South Korea, Taiwan, and, to a lesser degree, Indonesia have experienced successful democratic transformation, while Thailand and the Philippines have failed to establish stable democratic systems.