More than any other art form, literature defined Eastern Europe as a cultural and political entity in the second half of the twentieth century. Although often persecuted by the state, East European writers formed what was frequently recognized to be a "second government," and their voices were heard and revered inside and outside the borders of their countries. This study by one of our most influential specialists on Eastern Europe considers the effects of the end of communism on such writers. According to Andrew Baruch Wachtel, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the creation of fledgling societies in Eastern Europe brought an end to the conditions that put the region's writers on a pedestal. In the euphoria that accompanied democracy and free markets, writers were liberated from the burden of grandiose political expectations. But no group is happy to lose its influence: despite recognizing that their exalted social position was related to their reputation for challenging political oppression, such writers have worked hard to retain their status, inventing a series of new strategies for this purpose. "Remaining Relevant after Communism" considers these strategies - from pulp fiction to public service - documenting what has happened on the East European scene since 1989.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
非常有意思的書，但其對de-pedestalization的分析似乎大多齣自於作者的arrogant hostility, 因而assertion略明顯。總的來說，提供瞭一些很有價值的empirical evidence，可以進一步用Bourdieu的field理論探討二十世紀俄國及東歐文學在本質上有一種很不同的rule of art，並且這種rule在“communist totalitarianism"與"capitalist cultural industry"的夾縫裏衍生齣的。
评分非常有意思的書，但其對de-pedestalization的分析似乎大多齣自於作者的arrogant hostility, 因而assertion略明顯。總的來說，提供瞭一些很有價值的empirical evidence，可以進一步用Bourdieu的field理論探討二十世紀俄國及東歐文學在本質上有一種很不同的rule of art，並且這種rule在“communist totalitarianism"與"capitalist cultural industry"的夾縫裏衍生齣的。
评分非常有意思的書，但其對de-pedestalization的分析似乎大多齣自於作者的arrogant hostility, 因而assertion略明顯。總的來說，提供瞭一些很有價值的empirical evidence，可以進一步用Bourdieu的field理論探討二十世紀俄國及東歐文學在本質上有一種很不同的rule of art，並且這種rule在“communist totalitarianism"與"capitalist cultural industry"的夾縫裏衍生齣的。
评分非常有意思的書，但其對de-pedestalization的分析似乎大多齣自於作者的arrogant hostility, 因而assertion略明顯。總的來說，提供瞭一些很有價值的empirical evidence，可以進一步用Bourdieu的field理論探討二十世紀俄國及東歐文學在本質上有一種很不同的rule of art，並且這種rule在“communist totalitarianism"與"capitalist cultural industry"的夾縫裏衍生齣的。
评分非常有意思的書，但其對de-pedestalization的分析似乎大多齣自於作者的arrogant hostility, 因而assertion略明顯。總的來說，提供瞭一些很有價值的empirical evidence，可以進一步用Bourdieu的field理論探討二十世紀俄國及東歐文學在本質上有一種很不同的rule of art，並且這種rule在“communist totalitarianism"與"capitalist cultural industry"的夾縫裏衍生齣的。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有