"How Doctors Think" defines the nature and importance of clinical judgement. Although physicians make use of science, this book argues that medicine is not itself a science, but rather an interpretive practice that relies on clinical reasoning. A physician looks at the patient's history along with the presenting physical signs and symptoms, and juxtaposes these with clinical experience and empirical studies to construct a tentative account of the illness. "How Doctors Think" is divided into four parts. Part One introduces the concept of medicine as a practice rather than a science; Part Two discusses the idea of causation; Part Three delves into the process of forming clinical judgement; and Part Four considers clinical judgement within the uncertain nature of medicine itself. "How Doctors Think" contends that there can be adverse side effects to assuming that medicine is strictly science, and suggests reducing these by recognizing the vital role of clinical judgement.
具体描述
读后感
The title of the book is misleading. It had better call itself How Doctors Should Think, rather than How Doctors Think. There is substantial difference between the two. The latter is about description of facts, i.e. how clinical decisions are made in hospit...
评分The title of the book is misleading. It had better call itself How Doctors Should Think, rather than How Doctors Think. There is substantial difference between the two. The latter is about description of facts, i.e. how clinical decisions are made in hospit...
评分The title of the book is misleading. It had better call itself How Doctors Should Think, rather than How Doctors Think. There is substantial difference between the two. The latter is about description of facts, i.e. how clinical decisions are made in hospit...
评分The title of the book is misleading. It had better call itself How Doctors Should Think, rather than How Doctors Think. There is substantial difference between the two. The latter is about description of facts, i.e. how clinical decisions are made in hospit...
评分The title of the book is misleading. It had better call itself How Doctors Should Think, rather than How Doctors Think. There is substantial difference between the two. The latter is about description of facts, i.e. how clinical decisions are made in hospit...
用户评价
读完了来豆瓣登记才发现读错了书，我艹。虽然这本书也不差，可惜跟Groopman比起来差距太大了。
评分读完了来豆瓣登记才发现读错了书，我艹。虽然这本书也不差，可惜跟Groopman比起来差距太大了。
评分读完了来豆瓣登记才发现读错了书，我艹。虽然这本书也不差，可惜跟Groopman比起来差距太大了。
评分读完了来豆瓣登记才发现读错了书，我艹。虽然这本书也不差，可惜跟Groopman比起来差距太大了。
评分读完了来豆瓣登记才发现读错了书，我艹。虽然这本书也不差，可惜跟Groopman比起来差距太大了。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有