伊莱休 卡茨,美国宾夕法尼亚大学教授,著名传播学者;
译者常江,清华大学新闻与传播学院博士研究生
ARE THERE ANY? Many of us have our own canonic texts - the kind that won't
go away. We tell them that their time has passed, that it's embarrassing
they're still around, but they turn up repeatedly on our reading lists and
in our bibliographies. They inspire us, haunt us, argue with us -- but they
won't leave. Typically, we keep them to ourselves.
SHOULD THERE BE? Of course there should be, and there's no reason to hide
them. Canons (and saints) should be shared, because they define fields and
communities. These texts are not simply monuments, however. They are alive
and breathing, standing the test of time by shedding old meanings and
assuming new ones. The minimal care they need - occasional brushing off and
bulb-changing - is well worth the trouble.
HOW ABOUT THESE? The field of media studies is now more than 50 years old,
and the contributors to this volume offer their own candidates for canonization. Each of the thirteen essays in the book presents a critical reading of one of these classics and debates its candidacy. You are invited to disagree. The texts are summarized, analysed and re-examined for their contemporary relevance. They are grouped together in schools (Chicago, Columbia, Frankfurt, Toronto, British Cultural Studies) to highlight the different perspectives that characterize the field.
This book offers thirteen pairs of shoulders to stand on, the better to see the field of media studies. It will serve as an excellent teaching text for advanced students in communications and media and cultural studies.
卡尔维诺曾为文学作品编辑了《为什么读经典》一书,他说,经典是那些你经常听人家说“我正在重读”而不是“我正在读”的书,哪怕与它格格不入的现在占统治地位,它也坚持至少成为一种背景噪音。你喜欢或者不喜欢,经典都在那里。 任何一本关于“经典”的书都要回...
评分卡尔维诺曾为文学作品编辑了《为什么读经典》一书,他说,经典是那些你经常听人家说“我正在重读”而不是“我正在读”的书,哪怕与它格格不入的现在占统治地位,它也坚持至少成为一种背景噪音。你喜欢或者不喜欢,经典都在那里。 任何一本关于“经典”的书都要回...
评分1.批判学派并非“一个”派,而是派中有派,也并非一个“派”,是一种视角也好,一种方法论也好,总之绝对不是与经验学派处在一个层面上的讨论。 2.马克思真是影响了太多的人,拉扎斯菲尔德与默顿(均对马克思主义的批判理论和社会理论大加认可)、赫佐格(肥皂剧观众的无意识与...
评分1.批判学派并非“一个”派,而是派中有派,也并非一个“派”,是一种视角也好,一种方法论也好,总之绝对不是与经验学派处在一个层面上的讨论。 2.马克思真是影响了太多的人,拉扎斯菲尔德与默顿(均对马克思主义的批判理论和社会理论大加认可)、赫佐格(肥皂剧观众的无意识与...
评分1.批判学派并非“一个”派,而是派中有派,也并非一个“派”,是一种视角也好,一种方法论也好,总之绝对不是与经验学派处在一个层面上的讨论。 2.马克思真是影响了太多的人,拉扎斯菲尔德与默顿(均对马克思主义的批判理论和社会理论大加认可)、赫佐格(肥皂剧观众的无意识与...
Week1
评分Week1
评分Week1
评分Week1
评分Week1
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有