Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Batrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim, and then follows the thread through its continuation in the transcendental deduction of the categories, the transcendental schemata, and the principles of pure understanding. The result is a systematic, persuasive new interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Longuenesse shows that although Kant adopts his inventory of the forms of judgment from logic textbooks of his time, he is nevertheless original in selecting just those forms he holds to be indispensable to our ability to relate representations to objects. Kant gives formal representation to this relation between conceptual thought and its objects by introducing the term "x" into his analysis of logical forms to stand for the object that is "thought under" the concepts that are combined in judgment. This "x" plays no role in Kant's forms of logical inference, but instead plays a role in clarifying the relation between logical forms (forms of concept subordination) and combinations ("syntheses") of perceptual data, necessary for empirical cognition. Considering Kant's logical forms of judgment thus helps illuminate crucial aspects of the Transcendental Analytic as a whole, while revealing the systematic unity between Kant's theory of judgment in the first Critique and his analysis of "merely reflective" (aesthetic and teleological) judgments in the third Critique.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
阅读过程实在太痛苦了，作者围绕先验演绎、图示论、经验类比展开，试图辩护康德内在论证的一致性。但如作者所说，显像概念的模糊性，以及表象及其对象都内化于表象之内具体如何可能（这个意义上表象能否为表象）都悬而未决。
评分阅读过程实在太痛苦了，作者围绕先验演绎、图示论、经验类比展开，试图辩护康德内在论证的一致性。但如作者所说，显像概念的模糊性，以及表象及其对象都内化于表象之内具体如何可能（这个意义上表象能否为表象）都悬而未决。
评分阅读过程实在太痛苦了，作者围绕先验演绎、图示论、经验类比展开，试图辩护康德内在论证的一致性。但如作者所说，显像概念的模糊性，以及表象及其对象都内化于表象之内具体如何可能（这个意义上表象能否为表象）都悬而未决。
评分阅读过程实在太痛苦了，作者围绕先验演绎、图示论、经验类比展开，试图辩护康德内在论证的一致性。但如作者所说，显像概念的模糊性，以及表象及其对象都内化于表象之内具体如何可能（这个意义上表象能否为表象）都悬而未决。
评分阅读过程实在太痛苦了，作者围绕先验演绎、图示论、经验类比展开，试图辩护康德内在论证的一致性。但如作者所说，显像概念的模糊性，以及表象及其对象都内化于表象之内具体如何可能（这个意义上表象能否为表象）都悬而未决。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有