Insurgency Trap pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Eli Friedman is Assistant Professor of International and Comparative Labor at Cornell University.
- 劳工运动
- 社会学
- 政治学
- 中国政治
- 社会运动
- 當代中國研究
- 政治社会学
- 政治學
During the first decade of the twenty-first century, worker resistance in China increased rapidly despite the fact that certain segments of the state began moving in a pro-labor direction. In explaining this, Eli Friedman argues that the Chinese state has become hemmed in by an “insurgency trap” of its own devising and is thus unable to tame expansive worker unrest. Labor conflict in the process of capitalist industrialization is certainly not unique to China and indeed has appeared in a wide array of countries around the world. What is distinct in China, however, is the combination of postsocialist politics with rapid capitalist development.
Other countries undergoing capitalist industrialization have incorporated relatively independent unions to tame labor conflict and channel insurgent workers into legal and rationalized modes of contention. In contrast, the Chinese state only allows for one union federation, the All China Federation of Trade Unions, over which it maintains tight control. Official unions have been unable to win recognition from workers, and wildcat strikes and other forms of disruption continue to be the most effective means for addressing workplace grievances. In support of this argument, Friedman offers evidence from Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, where unions are experimenting with new initiatives, leadership models, and organizational forms.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
对波兰尼理论有一定推进，好像伯克利的都特别喜欢拿波兰尼的countermovement说事儿，看到了两本博士论文基础上的书都在针对这个。然而，整本书的架构围绕工会、工人、政府展开，我比较怀疑的是工会在整个框架中是否应该被赋予那么大的权重。如果工会本身并不是那么relevant或者只是国家应对机制中较小甚至不那么重要的一部分的话，那么书里面的“国家（工会）想解决劳资矛盾但是为什么解决不了”的问题就并不是那么强烈了。
评分炸男力作
评分炸男力作
评分对波兰尼理论有一定推进，好像伯克利的都特别喜欢拿波兰尼的countermovement说事儿，看到了两本博士论文基础上的书都在针对这个。然而，整本书的架构围绕工会、工人、政府展开，我比较怀疑的是工会在整个框架中是否应该被赋予那么大的权重。如果工会本身并不是那么relevant或者只是国家应对机制中较小甚至不那么重要的一部分的话，那么书里面的“国家（工会）想解决劳资矛盾但是为什么解决不了”的问题就并不是那么强烈了。
评分对波兰尼理论有一定推进，好像伯克利的都特别喜欢拿波兰尼的countermovement说事儿，看到了两本博士论文基础上的书都在针对这个。然而，整本书的架构围绕工会、工人、政府展开，我比较怀疑的是工会在整个框架中是否应该被赋予那么大的权重。如果工会本身并不是那么relevant或者只是国家应对机制中较小甚至不那么重要的一部分的话，那么书里面的“国家（工会）想解决劳资矛盾但是为什么解决不了”的问题就并不是那么强烈了。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有