Initially produced as the catalog to accompany a controversial and groundbreaking 1932 Museum of Modern Art show of the then new architecture emerging in Europe and America, The International Style quickly became the definitive statement of the principles underlying the work of such giants as Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, and other pioneers. It might be said that Henry-Russell Hitchcock and Philip Johnson discovered as well as defined "the International Style," and over the decades their book has served as both a flashpoint for criticism and a frame for growth in the architectural profession. It has never been out of print in over sixty years. This new edition has been completely redesigned and reset, and it features a new foreword by Philip Johnson, who reflects on the legacy of the International Style and examines the still-precarious power of architecture in our public life.
First, I have to say the statements in the book of Henri-Russell Hitchcock may have been substantial in certain context of the history. But a lot of concrete principles, once considered as progressive have become dogma today. So what I am trying to do right...
评分First, I have to say the statements in the book of Henri-Russell Hitchcock may have been substantial in certain context of the history. But a lot of concrete principles, once considered as progressive have become dogma today. So what I am trying to do right...
评分First, I have to say the statements in the book of Henri-Russell Hitchcock may have been substantial in certain context of the history. But a lot of concrete principles, once considered as progressive have become dogma today. So what I am trying to do right...
评分First, I have to say the statements in the book of Henri-Russell Hitchcock may have been substantial in certain context of the history. But a lot of concrete principles, once considered as progressive have become dogma today. So what I am trying to do right...
评分First, I have to say the statements in the book of Henri-Russell Hitchcock may have been substantial in certain context of the history. But a lot of concrete principles, once considered as progressive have become dogma today. So what I am trying to do right...
Go International Style
评分提纲挈领宣言体。从哥特之后,就只是在表面而不是结构上创新,直到现代主义出现。Paperback的印刷质量,图片基本无法直视……
评分粗暴的总结是亵渎。
评分提纲挈领宣言体。从哥特之后,就只是在表面而不是结构上创新,直到现代主义出现。Paperback的印刷质量,图片基本无法直视……
评分站在今人的privilleged的角度可以批驳的点的确很多,但更有趣的是看Hitchcock & Johnson如何在style已经被早先的eclecticism赋予太多负面意义(theatrical, kitsch, rigid etc.)试图挽回并重定义这个艺术史、建筑史所无法抛弃而至关重要的概念。以及对此他们如何成功或失败——all in all, "style"永远是一个有趣的话题
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有