The Sovereign State and Its Competitors pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Research Interest(s): Historical Sociology and International Relations; State Formation and Disintegration; International Systems and Regional Orders
HENDRIK SPRUYT
PROFESSOR
Department of Political Science, Northwestern University
Program Area(s): International Relations; Comparative Politics
Regional Specialization(s): Middle East; Europe
Department Strength(s): Comparative Historical Analysis
Professor Spruyt previously taught International Relations at Columbia University (1991-1999) and Arizona State University (1999-2003) before joining the faculty at Northwestern. He received a Doctorandus from the University of Leiden, School of Law, (The Netherlands) in 1983, and his Ph. D in Political Science from the University of California, San Diego in 1991. He was chair of the Department of Political Science at Northwestern from 2005-2008, and Director of the Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies from 2008-2013. Professor Spruyt has also served as co-editor of The Review of International Political Economy and has served on various editorial boards including the APSR.
- 政治学
- 历史社会学
- 社会学
- 国家建设
- 历史
- Politics
- state
- 政治
From Scientific American
Spruyt ... shows that sovereign states of Europe emerged from the decline of feudalism as urban units gained freedom and formed leagues.... He also puts into perspective the European Union that today's nationstates are attempting to put together.... A significant contribution to political science and to European history.
From The New Yorker
Spruyt takes on a theme that is ... of central import to political science.... A convincing demonstration that there was nothing inevitable about the triumph of the [present] form of the state.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
not unilinear path from feudalism to the sovereign state; challenge Tillian war-making-state; the cause was not military but economic, internal demands greater than external military requests; greater efficiency of the unified sovereign state in handling internal conflicts and in setting up uniform rules and measures that merchants want.
评分not unilinear path from feudalism to the sovereign state; challenge Tillian war-making-state; the cause was not military but economic, internal demands greater than external military requests; greater efficiency of the unified sovereign state in handling internal conflicts and in setting up uniform rules and measures that merchants want.
评分这本书啊，一颗赛艇！至少相当一部分做到了一直以来理想中的事情：1不把民族国家作为天然框架和唯一必然的终极目标而引发“倒着读历史”的谬误；2引入（虽然只是最基础的而且还带有强烈功能论色彩的）生物竞争和演化学说，以战争为竞争拟态解释作为组织形态的国家为何在中世纪多种政治形态竞争中胜出；3 超越国关理论中极其无聊的两大争论：事实上还原到单位的系统理论vs带有强烈无政府系统假设的单位理论（可以说是国关粗糙版的结构—能动问题），基于权能的天然无政府状态vs基于互动的国际社会建构说，将单位和系统置于特定历史条件下相互形构的情景，考察制度的中介作用；4打通国关与历史社会学，外部冲击（贸易与经济增长）—政治体内部社会阶级重构（德法意统治关系）—制度选择—政体变化—政体互动竞争与胜者加强—系统形成，逻辑完满。
评分not unilinear path from feudalism to the sovereign state; challenge Tillian war-making-state; the cause was not military but economic, internal demands greater than external military requests; greater efficiency of the unified sovereign state in handling internal conflicts and in setting up uniform rules and measures that merchants want.
评分Enlighting!
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有