Is economic development conducive to political democracy? Does democracy foster or hinder material welfare? These two questions are examined by looking at the experience of 135 countries between 1950 and 1990. Descriptive information, statistical analyses, and historical narratives are interwoven to gain an understanding of the dynamic of political regimes and their impact on economic development and other aspects of material welfare. The findings, several most surprising, dispel any notion of a trade-off between democracy and development. Economic development does not generate democracies but democracies are much more likely to survive in wealthy societies. Political regimes have no impact on the growth of total national incomes, while political instability affects growth only in dictatorships. Per capita incomes grow faster in democracies since population increases faster under dictatorships. In general, political regimes have more of an effect on demography than on economics.
評分
評分
評分
評分
在討論民主製度和經濟增長上的方法有待商榷,但關於不同政體在不同階段有不同的經濟增長模式的討論倒是蠻有意思的。在經濟起步階段,民主國傢和非民主國傢直接因為絕對值所限區彆不大,但到瞭增長後期,非民主國傢更多依賴廉價勞動力實現發展,而民主國傢則通過資本積纍和勞力質量的提升發展。是個很好的實證題目
评分The world will be better, much better.
评分The world will be better, much better.
评分MIT的牛人的那篇反駁就衝這書去的
评分但凡有關民主化的政治經濟學研究必引之著作;也由於精細的方法層齣不窮,本書於當下的價值主要在第一章的民主的操作化定義和政體(regime)分類法。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有