The question of what constitutes the good life has been pondered for millennia. Yet only in the last decades has the study of well-being become a scientific endeavor. This book is based on the idea that we can empirically study quality of life and make cross-society comparisons of subjective well-being (SWB).A potential problem in studying SWB across societies is that of cultural relativism: if societies have different values, the members of those societies will use different criteria in evaluating the success of their society. By examining, however, such aspects of SWB as whether people believe they are living correctly, whether they enjoy their lives, and whether others important to them believe they are living well, SWB can represent the degree to which people in a society are achieving the values they hold dear.The contributors analyze SWB in relation to money, age, gender, democracy, and other factors. Among the interesting findings is that although wealthy nations are on average happier than poor ones, people do not get happier as a wealthy nation grows wealthier.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
寶寶在傢除瞭安逸地生活，居然花瞭五天時間非常認真地讀完瞭這本書。。。。這本涵蓋瞭Ed Diener早期的文化與Well-being的研究，還是很耐看的~~除瞭早期的研究似乎不怎麼區分hedonic與eudaimonic的well-being，居然都歸為瞭SWB。。。。
评分痛並快樂著~雖然糾結但還是給我好多想法~
评分痛並快樂著~雖然糾結但還是給我好多想法~
评分寶寶在傢除瞭安逸地生活，居然花瞭五天時間非常認真地讀完瞭這本書。。。。這本涵蓋瞭Ed Diener早期的文化與Well-being的研究，還是很耐看的~~除瞭早期的研究似乎不怎麼區分hedonic與eudaimonic的well-being，居然都歸為瞭SWB。。。。
评分寶寶在傢除瞭安逸地生活，居然花瞭五天時間非常認真地讀完瞭這本書。。。。這本涵蓋瞭Ed Diener早期的文化與Well-being的研究，還是很耐看的~~除瞭早期的研究似乎不怎麼區分hedonic與eudaimonic的well-being，居然都歸為瞭SWB。。。。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有