Jonathan Simon is Associate Dean of Jurisprudence and Social Policy and Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. Co-editor of the journal Punishment & Society, he is also the author of Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890-1990 and co-editor of two other volumes.
Across America today gated communities sprawl out from urban centers, employers enforce mandatory drug testing, and schools screen students with metal detectors. Social problems ranging from welfare dependency to educational inequality have been reconceptualized as crimes, with an attendant focus on assigning fault and imposing consequences. Even before the recent terrorist attacks, non-citizen residents had become subject to an increasingly harsh regime of detention and deportation, and prospective employees subjected to background checks. How and when did our everyday world become dominated by fear, every citizen treated as a potential criminal? In this startlingly original work, Jonathan Simon traces this pattern back to the collapse of the New Deal approach to governing during the 1960s when declining confidence in expert-guided government policies sent political leaders searching for new models of governance. The War on Crime offered a ready solution to their problem: politicians set agendas by drawing analogies to crime and redefined the ideal citizen as a crime victim, one whose vulnerabilities opened the door to overweening government intervention. By the 1980s, this transformation of the core powers of government had spilled over into the institutions that govern daily life. Soon our schools, our families, our workplaces, and our residential communities were being governed through crime. This powerful work concludes with a call for passive citizens to become engaged partners in the management of risk and the treatment of social ills. Only by coming together to produce security, can we free ourselves from a logic of domination by others, and from the fear that currently rules our everyday life.
評分
評分
評分
評分
繼承福柯思想研究governing through crime如何改變瞭行政、立法、司法間的微妙平衡,如何滲透入傢庭、學校、工作單位。論點強大,實證有些零碎,最大問題是對crime的定義有些泛,對程度說的有些誇張——雖然每個人argue時都會這樣。另一個問題是so what??
评分繼承福柯思想研究governing through crime如何改變瞭行政、立法、司法間的微妙平衡,如何滲透入傢庭、學校、工作單位。論點強大,實證有些零碎,最大問題是對crime的定義有些泛,對程度說的有些誇張——雖然每個人argue時都會這樣。另一個問題是so what??
评分繼承福柯思想研究governing through crime如何改變瞭行政、立法、司法間的微妙平衡,如何滲透入傢庭、學校、工作單位。論點強大,實證有些零碎,最大問題是對crime的定義有些泛,對程度說的有些誇張——雖然每個人argue時都會這樣。另一個問題是so what??
评分繼承福柯思想研究governing through crime如何改變瞭行政、立法、司法間的微妙平衡,如何滲透入傢庭、學校、工作單位。論點強大,實證有些零碎,最大問題是對crime的定義有些泛,對程度說的有些誇張——雖然每個人argue時都會這樣。另一個問題是so what??
评分繼承福柯思想研究governing through crime如何改變瞭行政、立法、司法間的微妙平衡,如何滲透入傢庭、學校、工作單位。論點強大,實證有些零碎,最大問題是對crime的定義有些泛,對程度說的有些誇張——雖然每個人argue時都會這樣。另一個問題是so what??
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有