Idealism pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Tyron Goldschmidt is a visiting assistant professor in philosophy at Wake Forest University. He has journal publications in metaphysics, philosophy of religion and the history of philosophy. He co-authored Berkeley's Principles: Expanded and Explained (Routledge, 2016) and edited The Puzzle of Existence: Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? (Routledge, 2013).
Kenneth Pearce is Ussher Assistant Professor in Berkeley Studies (Early Modern Philosophy) at Trinity College Dublin. He has journal publications in early modern philosophy, metaphysics and philosophy of religion. He is the author of Language and the Structure of Berkeley's World (OUP, 2017).
Contributors:
Arif Ahmed, Cambridge University
Sara Bernstein, Duke University
Todd Buras, Baylor University
Trent Dougherty, Baylor University
Bronwyn Finnigan, Australian National University
Tyron Goldschmidt, Wake Forest University
Daniel Greco, Yale University
Thomas Hofweber, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Marc Lange, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Samuel Lebens, University of Haifa
Kris McDaniel, Syracuse University
Graham Oppy, Monash University
Kenneth L. Pearce, Trinity College Dublin
Jacob Ross, University of Southern California
Susan Schneider, University of Connecticut
Aaron Segal, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Robert Smithson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Nick Stang, University of Toronto
Helen Yetter-Chappell, University of York
- 哲學
- 觀念論
Idealism is a family of metaphysical views each of which gives priority to the mental. The best-known forms of idealism in Western philosophy are Berkeleyan idealism, which gives ontological priority to the mental (minds and ideas) over the physical (bodies), and Kantian idealism, which gives a kind of explanatory priority to the mental (the structure of the understanding) over the physical (the structure of the empirical world).
Although idealism was once a dominant view in Western philosophy, it has suffered almost total neglect over the last several decades. This book rectifies this situation by bringing together seventeen essays by leading philosophers on the topic of metaphysical idealism. The various essays explain, attack, or defend a variety of idealistic theories, including not only Berkeleyan and Kantian idealisms but also those developed in traditions less familiar to analytic philosophers, including Buddhism and Hassidic Judaism. Although a number of the articles draw on historical sources, all will be of interest to philosophers working in contemporary metaphysics. This volume aims to spark a revival of serious philosophical interest in metaphysical idealism.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
1.也許各位作者都覺得全局性的唯心論不可信，大部分文章都在保守地論證：唯心論立場能夠成為一個嚴肅的理論可選項（or something near enough）；2.關於唯心論的曆史與地理脈絡的梳理性文本都寫得較為糟糕（尤‘Hassidic Idealism’一文）；3.久違地被一種激進的哲學立場說服：Mereological Idealism.
评分1.也許各位作者都覺得全局性的唯心論不可信，大部分文章都在保守地論證：唯心論立場能夠成為一個嚴肅的理論可選項（or something near enough）；2.關於唯心論的曆史與地理脈絡的梳理性文本都寫得較為糟糕（尤‘Hassidic Idealism’一文）；3.久違地被一種激進的哲學立場說服：Mereological Idealism.
评分1.也許各位作者都覺得全局性的唯心論不可信，大部分文章都在保守地論證：唯心論立場能夠成為一個嚴肅的理論可選項（or something near enough）；2.關於唯心論的曆史與地理脈絡的梳理性文本都寫得較為糟糕（尤‘Hassidic Idealism’一文）；3.久違地被一種激進的哲學立場說服：Mereological Idealism.
评分1.也許各位作者都覺得全局性的唯心論不可信，大部分文章都在保守地論證：唯心論立場能夠成為一個嚴肅的理論可選項（or something near enough）；2.關於唯心論的曆史與地理脈絡的梳理性文本都寫得較為糟糕（尤‘Hassidic Idealism’一文）；3.久違地被一種激進的哲學立場說服：Mereological Idealism.
评分1.也許各位作者都覺得全局性的唯心論不可信，大部分文章都在保守地論證：唯心論立場能夠成為一個嚴肅的理論可選項（or something near enough）；2.關於唯心論的曆史與地理脈絡的梳理性文本都寫得較為糟糕（尤‘Hassidic Idealism’一文）；3.久違地被一種激進的哲學立場說服：Mereological Idealism.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有